IdiosyncraticLawyer
Username OnlyVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 3,256
- 3,961
Bump.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Multiplier standards clarification
- Thread starter DontTalkDT
- Start date
-
- Tags
- multipliers
- Status
- 168,532
- 77,301
IdiosyncraticLawyer
Username OnlyVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 3,256
- 3,961
Bump.
- 168,532
- 77,301
- 31,587
- 28,044
I'll wait to see if DontTalk has anything new to say, or any suggestions.
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,100
- 6,037
What he said here previously is simply, for larger multipliers, the boost needs to be supported by the plot
also my previous view on it is still the same
Verses should also have a feat outside the multiplier that is close to the said multipliers.
I mean if a verse only feat was Country level and through stacking of multiple multipliers throughout the series, they could get to Planet level without an actual showing of anything even remotely close to that, that brings up an issue.
And such things should be brought under closer review to ensure they are valid, the same goes for Speed multiplier stacking
also my previous view on it is still the same
Verses should also have a feat outside the multiplier that is close to the said multipliers.
I mean if a verse only feat was Country level and through stacking of multiple multipliers throughout the series, they could get to Planet level without an actual showing of anything even remotely close to that, that brings up an issue.
And such things should be brought under closer review to ensure they are valid, the same goes for Speed multiplier stacking
- 168,532
- 77,301
Yes, that seems sensible to me.
I am not sure. It depends on how canonically explicit a multiplier is.
- 31,645
- 34,692
I do not have a lot of time relative to then numerous notifications I have, but based the above take, I don't think my stance has changed.
IdiosyncraticLawyer
Username OnlyVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 3,256
- 3,961
Bump.
IdiosyncraticLawyer
Username OnlyVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 3,256
- 3,961
Unfortunately, I don't see any real consensus here.
- 15,454
- 15,480
I don't feel like the OP has a solid stance
People will freak out over a 100x multiplier and then say it's inconsistent and unsupported, and then also be ok when a 7-C character has a 7-A transformation based on calcs and feats. Even though the difference between 7-C and 7-A is like 1000x. So like, I don't get what the OP is trying to argue. Via multiple characters in a row using a multiplier, you can easily have a gap be over 100x.
Frankly I would need a lot of evidence that debunks a multiplier to completely discredit a statement like "I'm at 1% power" or "This form makes me 100x stronger"
People will freak out over a 100x multiplier and then say it's inconsistent and unsupported, and then also be ok when a 7-C character has a 7-A transformation based on calcs and feats. Even though the difference between 7-C and 7-A is like 1000x. So like, I don't get what the OP is trying to argue. Via multiple characters in a row using a multiplier, you can easily have a gap be over 100x.
Frankly I would need a lot of evidence that debunks a multiplier to completely discredit a statement like "I'm at 1% power" or "This form makes me 100x stronger"
IdiosyncraticLawyer
Username OnlyVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 3,256
- 3,961
@Antvasima Could you tag everyone again?
IdiosyncraticLawyer
Username OnlyVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 3,256
- 3,961
- 10,942
- 12,446
- Thread starter
- #57
This thread is not all extremely old, but it was supposed to just clarify what an existing standard was supposed to mean and devolved in debating whether the standard should exist... it should honestly just be redone at a later point, so I will close it for now.
Btw. since people wanted an example, I may as well give one for now. See here for Kamen Riders upscaling a 25 megaton feat to 312.5 Terraton (and x6 to x11 higher for the finisher) by repeatedly staking multipliers. That's a 12.5 million times increase from City to Large Country level. Stuff like that is what I would doubt without evidence beyond "but A damaged B a lot".
Btw. since people wanted an example, I may as well give one for now. See here for Kamen Riders upscaling a 25 megaton feat to 312.5 Terraton (and x6 to x11 higher for the finisher) by repeatedly staking multipliers. That's a 12.5 million times increase from City to Large Country level. Stuff like that is what I would doubt without evidence beyond "but A damaged B a lot".
- Status
