Morality categories

[Antvasima]

You can comment, but you also have to be self-critical in engaging with things you know you dislike. For example I don't actively get involved in a lot of stuff regarding Chinese Web Novels because I don't really understand the culture associated with it (which heavily influences the tiering) and have embarrassed myself before when commenting on it.

I'll comment now when asked, but I'm self-critical of my bias when I do so. The following is just biased Ant:

I am almost always trying to be rational in my wiki work-related evaluations and to not let my personal like or dislike of a verse to influence them, even though I am honest/sincere when I talk about them. My removal of the moral category wasn't about my dislike of the thematics and ethics of Bleach, but rather about that Zaraki isn't a clear-cut self-evident case of moral goodness, and as such should not have had the category added per the fundamental definition of it.

All of the above shows a heavy negative outlook. In your linked wall you also showcase this same bias

I get that you don't think Kenpachi is good, but this entire thing was a self inflicted injury. You're blaming Arc for talking to you about a change you made after talking to no one about it. If any of us were to do the same you would be critical that we didn't follow the proper process.

I undid a change that broke our rules for moral categories, and that was likely added without any CRT, as this is usually the case for categories, and Arc7 did not seem to want to listen to reason in that regard, and I was very busy when forced to handle the issue, so I got stressed out.