• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Minor Steven Universe revisions

Ultima_Reality

?????????
VS Battles
Administrator
6,195
16,478
Welp, this is really minor and i don't even know if it counts as a revision >_> but anyways...

I've noticed that all the Fusions from Steven Universe have Low-High Regenerationn listed on their pages. However (fancy word o3o) it is shown that Fusions don't "poof" and regenerate inside their Gems when they take enough damage

They simply unfuse into the gems that compose them

So... i think Regenerationn should be removed from the fusions' pages
 
Yes, but they don't poof and regenerate inside their Gem forms, they simply unfuse into the gems that compose them, and then these gems regenerate inside their gem forms, but Fusions don't have Regenerationn by themselves

Edit: i really need to work on my wording >_>
 
Okay. Since WeeklyBattles answered the question, should we close this thread?
 
We should make it oblivious that fusions's components still have Regenerationn and can potentially fuse back
 
Back
Top