Minor one punch man downgrade i guess?

[Sus]

The already accepted calc uses 0.0001s for the time-frame based on garou and platinum's feat, but the feat actually had a different time-frame, 0.0013

Using the accepted distance with the actual timeframe would give a speed of ~617.012c MFTL

If someone disagrees with MFTL, try to come up with a new time-frame, but it be not the mid end or the high end of the calc, since they're using arguments from the garou calc and contradict it

 

[ImmortalDread]

Neutral, for now, I want to hear what others say

 

[Sus]

Btw, Upscaling parallel saitama and garou to MFTL+ is ok imo

 

[Coomandar]

 

[Coomandar]

opm is on good days.
small planet tats and psykos
mftl garou and psperm, possibly flash ?
high 6-a psykos

 

[Coomandar]

i'm neutral (kinda agree) but still neutral, i'll wait for more coments and i'll see

 

[Sus]

I don't see why would the timeframe be 0.0001?
The calc : using the timeframe from garous feat
Also the calc : devides the actual timeframe by 13

 

[Kin201]

In previous panels, it was shown that Garou can react in 0.1 milliseconds. That's the what the calc used. This 0.13 miliseconds doesn't seem to have anything to do with the calc

Edit: 1.3 miliseconds

 

[Sus]

In previous panels, it was shown that Garou can react in 0.1 milliseconds. That's the what the calc used. This 0.13 miliseconds doesn't seem to have anything to do with the calc

This is not what ghe calculation says, though

 

[Kin201]

The calc showed evidence that Garou's reaction speed is at least 0.1 milisecond. Saitama blitzed Garou, so it was assumed Saitama made that feat in 0.1 miliseconds.

 

[Sus]

Uh... that makes sense i suppose

I will ask for the thread to be closed

 

[Antvasima]

I will do so then.

Thank you to everybody who helped out here.