Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Im not saying it does. I'm just proving the power does exist. Ppl are saying the powers don't even exist. I mean they just took some shit and put it together and said "i used this, but i don't actually have this" according to these guys.Kepekley23 said:Even if we, for some reason, were to assume the gigantic wall of text with gag abilities was 100% true, why would creating a universe through a specific skill scale to Medaka's AP?
Just read the scan dude. "AFTER I DESTROYED THE MOON".Matthew Schroeder said:Fire, you are getting incoherent and rambling.
When did Medaka destroy the moon?Can you show the scene happening?
"Kind of another universe" isn't a feat. The queen of england isn't Country level, she can barely walk at this point.
DUDE! Where does medaka show those abilities?!Matthew Schroeder said:Cross-dimensional portals / teleportations are not an AP feat. Medaka is Tier 8. Crossing universes doesn't make her Tier 2.
So it's just a basic failure to grasp what factually occurs on-panel and willfully misinterpreting it?Firephoenixearl said:They are saying "he erased him on a physical level" which ofc is wrong. As Kumagawa said "zenkichi never happened". But eh.
Requiring any sort of strong objection that is related to feats to have at least one source/scan of their evidence would be a good starting place, imho. Cuz a lot of this thread has been 'this never happened' 'yeah huh' 'nuh uh' and acting smug or snide about such nonsubstantive rebuttals.Antvasima said:After this discussion is over with, it might be a good idea to write a new discussion rule, so we do not have to deal with the subject again.
That said, I wouldn't say that this series has anywhere near as crazy a fanbase as Steven Universe, for example.
I personally am not the biggest fan of Medaka and do not have the knowledge required to actually address all of your points in the OP, honestly. I was just jumping in here because there was some flagrant manipulation of semantics going on in a disingenuous manner to defeat a point without engaging it, that of the conceptual erasure.Firephoenixearl said:Ikr no one is even arguing the main 11 points of the thread. What do u think of them btw. Yes or No?
^Kepekley23 said:Why are we even considering an upgrade that makes use of a single sentence in a colossal wall of text with gag abilities that are never demonstrated, never elaborated upon in anyway? Why should we feign ignorance over the much lower actual feats the series has?
Medaka's Box as a whole always gets extremely generous reservations.
Nothing against the show, but yeah Steven Universe has the worst fanbase on Earth.Antvasima said:That said, I wouldn't say that this series has anywhere near as crazy a fanbase as Steven Universe, for example.
Yeah, well the claims say otherwise. There is no way you can just forget about claims if the feats aren't enough. Only casual things have been showed in feats as to (again) parodize shounen often taking this huge leap in power and destructive capabilities and therefore need a huge stage to fight. Both Medaka vs Unzen and Medaka vs Kumagawa and Medaka vs Iihiko took place in the same area (mostly), the enviroment wasn't rly destroyed (i mean it was but not destroyed in the sense of evaporated like it usually happens in shounen). But unzen is not even a warm up for Kumagawa and Iihiko.Kepekley23 said:We don't need to prove something has limits. It's assumed by default. That's why the No Limits Fallacy exists.
Just a claim, same as how Kumagawa claims to erase all of existence. Why 1 is believeable but the other isn't?Matthew Schroeder said:Azathoth's feat is dreaming entities like Yog-Sothoth into existence, don't act like Tier 0s are featless.
I don't think i am. Azazoth was said to have dreamed everything into existence. Is there a scene of him actually waking up and erasing everything? I don't think there is. A similar case with Kumagawa, he was said to erase all of existence with a simple thought, but hasn't "done" it yet. Why is Azazoth statement of "dreaming everything into existence" a feat for him and it's believeable (im not doubting azazoth btw), but Kumagawa's case of "erasing all of existence" is just considered a false clam and therefore not believeable.Kepekley23 said:You're confusing feats with statements.
As i said im not doubting Azazoth, but he hasn't done anything yet (to my knowledge at least), he is just there to make everything exist, that was just a statement though. I mean if you just see that creature without any explanation can u understand that everything exists cus of it? No u can't cus he doesn't do anything, there is no "on panel feat", without the author stating that he is the omnipotent of the verse you can't understand that. However in Kumagawa's case even though there is nothing to prove he can't erase all of existence, the statements are takes as false statements.ALRF said:Because it's a feat? Not even a statement but a feat that plays a role in the cosmology of Cthulhu?
Hmm, doesn't explain why you can believe the author in one but disregard him in the other.Kepekley23 said:Most of the Cthulhu Mythos is written from the PoV of a third person omniscient narrator, which means the feats are narrated to us objectively from a neutral perspective.