Lacku
He/Him- 3,222
- 4,450
I found a render we could useCould we also add a render for the mark 2?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I found a render we could useCould we also add a render for the mark 2?
LS?By the way, if the Mark 6 suits are normally 8-A. Then why did Tony struggle to move the helicarrier???
Low 7-C is already thrown out the window as the value Iron Man scales to is now lowerThe 8-A upgrades look fine, but I'm not in favor of the Low 7-C upscaling.
Looks like Qaws is the only that gave their approval for the use of the new 8-A calc, while Spino hasn't commented back.Bump.
How much more approval is needed
I guess we can appy the changes then?So three staff members
Spino: Pending 8-A
Qaws: Approved 8-A
Uchiha: Approved 8-A
I guess? We were given the green light by two Staff members
:]Though I still do not like Loki being back to 8-A reeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
let me update the calc with that real quickAlso the Iron Man Mark 4 should not be High 8-C, the 458 meter length is for the uber-massive Knock Nevis, the largest ship ever built. Actual tankers are normally 330 meters is what said tankers should be, absolute limit would be 400 meters for being able to traverse the Suez Canal.
well shitThough uh, I should note that according to this we surprisingly have less VLCC class cruisers than most other classes and the number of ULCC class tankers dwarf them all even if they were combined.
Mark 46, non-combatant armor, does not scale to 8-A in any meaningful way other than full-thrust power. Unless you wanna argue 8-A Cap.this should scale to Iron Man's physicals as iron Man's Repulsors have shown to be comparable to those around his level,
This seems fine, though I doubt he charged up considerably here compared to the Vanko charge up post-impact. At the very least this easily supports him being 8-B and such for taking his own blasts, given that he took the High 8-C+ boom in a pretty mangled-up state against Vanko, and that casual repulsor blasts and even bullrushes from the armor can make Loki groan in pain.and he can even outright tank his own blasts. Iron Man's armor can also survive the recoil of his repulsors.
I'm aware, I'm just making a point that generally, Iron Man armors are comparable to repulsorsMark 46, non-combatant armor, does not scale to 8-A in any meaningful way other than full-thrust power. Unless you wanna argue 8-A Cap.
But yeah, I see no problem with the Repulsors scaling to Iron Man's physicals. But the repulsors themselves should be separated by Marks depending on who they are able to consistently damage and what their feats are.
For example, Marks 2-4 having that container feat. Marks 6-43 having Loki and Vanko. Mark 45 having Sokovia. Marks 46 and 47 having Cap and Spidey level people being unable to damage it, with only metal arm Bucky having any chance, just means Bucky's metal arm is on the higher scaling chain of 8-C, seeing as a Unibeam completely ******* vaped his arm, and even Isaiah tore off half of his arm in Goyang.
LBaken of the 384 family hates 8-A Iron Man! They just got downgraded and came back stronger than ever yare yare daze. I agree
This means if we downgrade 8-A Iron Man again we could get 8-A+ Iron ManBaken of the 384 family hates 8-A Iron Man! They just got downgraded and came back stronger than ever yare yare daze. I agree