• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

MCU Phase 5 General Discussion Thread

Lloydblitzed said:
What's the point of even commenting on a CRT when your just "not on the mood" for it? It just waste a vote for nothing
Click to expand...
Because I was pinged for it even when I was bound not to give an opinion on the thread at all in the place when I saw it?
 
Propellus said:
Because I was pinged for it even when I was bound not to give an opinion on the thread at all in the place when I saw it?
Click to expand...
Just ignore it then that’s what most people do if they get tagged and don’t want to bother with it

Because if you just hop in and say disagree then it puts all the time op spent to make it go to waste
 
Propellus said:
Aye, ain't my fault when I actually saw y'all trying to suggest Base Thor to be literally multiversal in base and not just stormbreaker itself with no boundaries present in them at all. And besides, It's my choice whether or not if I didn't want to look at the threads that would rather get me tiresome and rather uncomfortable to evaluate.
Click to expand...
"And besides, It's my choice whether or not if I didn't want to look at the threads that would rather get me tiresome and rather uncomfortable to evaluate."
Ye so instead, Im gonna disagree instead with 0 reasoning bc Im not in the mood. If ur uncomfortable with it, don't comment or just say neutral
 
darkphantom9805 said:
Just ignore it then that’s what most people do if they get tagged and don’t want to bother with it

Because if you just hop in and say disagree then it puts all the time op spent to make it go to waste
Click to expand...
Fr. And according to Propellus himself, he's bad with tier 1 and tier 2 stuff and doesn't want to evaluate these type of threads so I don't why he would actually bother comment on it

Maybe he didn't realise it, but its just not funny and waste people's time
 
darkphantom9805 said:
This site just needs to change the way it works if the mods don’t even want to put effort in reviewing crt then crt shouldn’t need mod opinions in the first place as people who spend their time getting heavily involved in the verse just to be shot down cause mods can’t be bothered
Click to expand...
Letting the non-mods people manage CRTs and accept them freely would just transform the website into CSAP😭
 
Suigetsuhyugs said:
Is it only Netflix shows or is there any mention to Agents of shield, runaways ect?
Click to expand...
That article only brings up the Netflix shows, so there still doesn't seem to be much direct confirmation either way on the other pre-Disney+ shows, aside from Agent Carter being referred to as canon by the The Story of Marvel Studios: The Making of the Marvel Cinematic Universe book.

The most solid evidence supporting Agents of SHIELD being canon is still The Wakanda Files featuring Coulson being alive to report on post-Battle of New York events, and Nick Fury's recent profile on the Marvel website (which I'm pretty sure was only added last year) mentioning specific events from his appearance on Agents of SHIELD.

As for the canon statuses of other shows:
  • Inhumans: unclear, Anson Mount coming back to play Earth-838 Black Bolt doesn't really prove anything on its own
  • Runaways: unclear (was removed from both Hulu and Disney+)
  • Cloak and Dagger: unclear (was apparently very briefly referenced in the Luke Cage series)
 
Lloydblitzed said:
Letting the non-mods people manage CRTs and accept them freely would just transform the website into CSAP😭
Click to expand...
darkphantom9805 said:
It’s better then having mods who don’t even bother reading the crt run the place😭😭😭
Click to expand...
Could you both drop the topic? Otherwise I'm just going to have to start deleting posts otherwise it's just going to come across a toxicity.
 
Propellus said:
Could you both drop the topic? Otherwise I'm just going to have to start deleting posts otherwise it's just going to come across a toxicity.
Click to expand...
How is my post in any way toxic? Im saying its obv that without mod supervising CRTs the website would be just madness cuz everyone will edit the page like they want
 
darkphantom9805 said:
Goofy ahh rule and Stormbreaker wasn’t touched the other guy crt was to upgrade base thor and people who scale to him
Click to expand...
Pretty sure that he used most of the same arguments you did and the CRT was for both stormbreaker and Thor
Lloydblitzed said:
Unless its in a discussion rule, this was never a thing I saw everywhere
Click to expand...
vsbattles.fandom.com

Discussion Rules

VS Battles Wiki is a site where the members attempt to index the statistics of characters across different fictional franchises. These efforts lead to much discussion about certain feats, statements and calculations regarding their validity, reliability, etc. However, certain topics keep popping...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
  • When creating content revisions, it is essential to ensure that the topic has not been addressed previously. Rejected content revisions cannot be resubmitted within a short period of time (typically defined as within 3 to 4 months), except in cases where a staff member has a good reason to do so (e.g. important unconsidered information, violation of site standards or flaws in a calculation). This only applies to threads that have received extensive debate or have been rejected due to a clear conflict with the wiki's rules or standards. If a thread passes or is rejected without significant opposition, then opposition should not be restricted from making a point.
Click to expand...
 
Suigetsuhyugs said:
Pretty sure that he used most of the same arguments you did and the CRT was for both stormbreaker and Thor

vsbattles.fandom.com

Discussion Rules

VS Battles Wiki is a site where the members attempt to index the statistics of characters across different fictional franchises. These efforts lead to much discussion about certain feats, statements and calculations regarding their validity, reliability, etc. However, certain topics keep popping...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
Click to expand...
No, I used the argument that the Axe overpowered a full blast from the Gaunlet to scale it to the gaunlet, he used WOG to prove his Ultimate Weapon stuff
 
Lloydblitzed said:
No, I used the argument that the Axe overpowered a full blast from the Gaunlet to scale it to the gaunlet, he used WOG to prove his Ultimate Weapon stuff
Click to expand...
Pretty sure I saw a lot of those WoG used there.
Lloydblitzed said:
Earlier in the CRT, you said the axe would scale to the gaunlet at best. And later, in this thread, you said the axe didn't scale gaunlet bc it was damaged by the full blast. How was it damaged ?
Click to expand...
I said at best because that thread was about Thor and Stormbreaker being 2-B, that doesn't mean I agree with "the best case scenario" that would be Stormbreaker scaling to 3-A
I said that the blast thrown at Stormbreaker didn't damaged the gaunlet like a 3-A snap did so the blast that he used on Stormbreaker is significantly inferior to 3-A by an unknown degree
 
Suigetsuhyugs said:
I said at best because that thread was about Thor and Stormbreaker being 2-B, that doesn't mean I agree with "the best case scenario" that would be Stormbreaker scaling to 3-A
I said that the blast thrown at Stormbreaker didn't damaged the gaunlet like a 3-A snap did so the blast that he used on Stormbreaker is significantly inferior to 3-A by an unknown degree
Click to expand...
Ah ok. Rip Stormbreaker update😭
 
Suigetsuhyugs said:
Pretty sure I saw a lot of those WoG used there.
Click to expand...
Yes but that doesn’t mean it’s about stormbreaker the crt is literally called 2-B MCU thor & Thanos dawg

Suigetsuhyugs said:
I said that the blast thrown at Stormbreaker didn't damaged the gaunlet like a 3-A snap did so the blast that he used on Stormbreaker is significantly inferior to 3-A by an unknown degree
Click to expand...
Doesn’t have to already explained why you can even argue the draw back was exclusive to the snap you can also argue the snap was much higher then universal just because Thanos limited it to his own universe says nothing about the amount of energy he actually generated ap isn’t DC
 
darkphantom9805 said:
Yes but that doesn’t mean it’s about stormbreaker the crt is literally called 2-B MCU thor & Thanos dawg


Doesn’t have to already explained why you can even argue the draw back was exclusive to the snap you can also argue the snap was much higher then universal just because Thanos limited it to his own universe says nothing about the amount of energy he actually generated ap isn’t DC
Click to expand...
The fact the snap damaged the gaunlet will simply infinitetly debunk it, as it would imply more energy was used unfortunatly. Imma rewatch sum MCU stuff later
 
Lloydblitzed said:
The fact the snap damaged the gaunlet will simply infinitetly debunk it, as it would imply more energy was used unfortunatly 😔
Click to expand...
No because you can argue the snap is stronger then universal as it damaged the gauntlet which already has feats of universal power and no selling it
 
darkphantom9805 said:
Yes but that doesn’t mean it’s about stormbreaker the crt is literally called 2-B MCU thor & Thanos dawg
Click to expand...
If you think i'm wrong make the CRT or whatever and let the staff decide
darkphantom9805 said:
Doesn’t have to already explained why you can even argue the draw back was exclusive to the snap you can also argue the snap was much higher then universal just because Thanos limited it to his own universe says nothing about the amount of energy he actually generated ap isn’t DC
Click to expand...
The gaunlet doesn't know you are snapping, only knows the amount of energy that is flowing through it.
Look 3-A is actually a pretty high value because he didn't destroy the universe only an unknown amount of living beings around the whole universe, as far as we know there is likely billions or trillians of planets and stars that don't actually have any living being to kill. So are you trying to say that anytime the gaunlet is used Thanos is actively stopping Low 1-C amounts of energy? That makes no sense, the gaunlet draws the energy required to do whatever the user wishes for.
 
Suigetsuhyugs said:
The gaunlet doesn't know you are snapping, only knows the amount of energy that is flowing through it.
Look 3-A is actually a pretty high value because he didn't destroy the universe only an unknown amount of living beings around the whole universe, as far as we know there is likely billions or trillians of planets and stars that don't actually have any living being to kill. So are you trying to say that anytime the gaunlet is used Thanos is actively stopping Low 1-C amounts of energy? That makes no sense, the gaunlet draws the energy required to do whatever the user wishes for.
Click to expand...
Doesn’t know what are you on about the gauntlet isn’t alive the amount of power generating depends on Thanos who controls it

3-A actually isn’t high because 1 we know it can indeed destroy the universe entirely as it’s already done so and 2 it’s already generated infinite energy and did just fine

More nonsense you spouting Thanos has active control over what he does with the gauntlet and the energy produced obviously any time he activates it it’s not Low 1-C
 
Suigetsuhyugs said:
If you think i'm wrong make the CRT or whatever and let the staff decide

The gaunlet doesn't know you are snapping, only knows the amount of energy that is flowing through it.
Look 3-A is actually a pretty high value because he didn't destroy the universe only an unknown amount of living beings around the whole universe, as far as we know there is likely billions or trillians of planets and stars that don't actually have any living being to kill. So are you trying to say that anytime the gaunlet is used Thanos is actively stopping Low 1-C amounts of energy? That makes no sense, the gaunlet draws the energy required to do whatever the user wishes for.
Click to expand...
Rewatched sum Endgame stuff
The gaunlet wasn't damaged by the snap, but it was damaged later on bc Thanos reduced the stones to ashes (which nearly killed him)
So the Stormbreaker can scale to the gaunlet, and Thor can be scaled to 3-A with the Stormbreaker
 
Last edited:
Doesn’t matter if the gauntlet was damaged it just means the ap energy is higher then universal as it already generated universal energy before the snap and no sold it
 
Lloydblitzed said:
Wait actually...this makes it even worse, cuz after the snap, he still had the gems. By Endgame, using the weakened Gaunlet, he destroyed the gems, so Stormbreaker can scale
Click to expand...
What?? Did you not understand? The gauntlet was permanently damaged the blast that storm breaker took on did nothing. Having the stones there means nothing, also destroying the stones doesn't have a tier because stones can more easily destroy themselves
 
Suigetsuhyugs said:
What?? Did you not understand? The gauntlet was permanently damaged the blast that storm breaker took on did nothing. Having the stones there means nothing, also destroying the stones doesn't have a tier because stones can more easily destroy themselves
Click to expand...
How can the stone more easly destroy themsleves? Also, after the snap, Thanos only had burn marks on his hand. After he destroys the stone, he looks heavly damaged (burn marks on his face + he nearly died from it)

So the stone are def not "easy to destroy"
 
Lloydblitzed said:
How can the stone more easly destroy themsleves? Also, after the snap, Thanos only had burn marks on his hand. After he destroys the stone, he looks heavly damaged (burn marks on his face + he nearly died from it)

So the stone are def not "easy to destroy"
Click to expand...
First we saw that since the avengers when they showed tesseract could be stopped the mind stone on the scepter, they showed again because of Wanda's connection she could more easily destroy the mind stone.
After the snap the gaunlet was "fried" it's obvious that it can't hold as much energy has before so that's why Thanos was more damaged for the stones.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Yokoahh5743
  • Locked
edit mcu character profile
Replies
11
Views
2K
Baabasaplar95
Baabasaplar95
Naeem0304
(MCU) General CRT for the Infinity Stones, Dormammu/Zealots, The Watcher and Alioth
Replies
5
Views
1K
GrayCraft_Dragon
GrayCraft_Dragon
AppleLord
Yhwach Repacles Thanos in the MCU - search for the Stones
Replies
15
Views
2K
AppleLord
AppleLord
V999
  • Locked
Ronan the Accuser VS Metal Bat (0-5-0)
Replies
17
Views
2K
SheevShezarrine
SheevShezarrine
Marvel_Champion_07
  • Locked
MCU General CRT⁴
Replies
25
Views
2K
Starter_Pack
Starter_Pack
Back
Top