• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

MCU Phase 5 General Discussion Thread

Unrelated but do we consider the tie in games canon/usable?
I think they all have various aspects that are incompatible with what later movies established, such as Iron Man fighting a version of AIM in the tie-in games for the first two Iron Man movies that doesn't line up at all with their portrayal in Iron Man 3, which Tony hadn't previously encountered as Iron Man.

There's a few respect threads full of feats if anyone is interested in making profiles for the tie-in game versions of the characters though:

Iron Man

Hulk

Thor

Captain America
 
I think the other issues with scaling the Iron Spider to the Mark 50 is that stuff like Star-Lord's weapons being treated as a threat to it and the suit being damaged by an indirect hit from the Sanctuary II would suggest that a bunch of 7-A characters would also get bumped up to High 6-B+.
The Star-Lord thing was an assumption on the characters' parts, and his blasts have never been particularly potent. The Santuary II thing is very relevant as it wasn't powerful enough to even maim someone like Bucky at that range. The thing about the Ock thing is the nanoteck ripped away by Otto remained intact (no visible flaking of damaged nanooarticles). He detached part of the suit rather than breaking it, and I figure it's because the suit wasn't configured to be pulled outward. I mean, the arm blade couldn't even scratch it, so why would pulling it do damage?
 
I think they all have various aspects that are incompatible with what later movies established, such as Iron Man fighting a version of AIM in the tie-in games for the first two Iron Man movies that doesn't line up at all with their portrayal in Iron Man 3, which Tony hadn't previously encountered as Iron Man.

There's a few respect threads full of feats if anyone is interested in making profiles for the tie-in game versions of the characters though:

Iron Man

Hulk

Thor

Captain America
Yeah I figured, but the Captain America one should be fine, no?
 
According to the Spider-Man 2 novel, Doc Ock was zapped with enough electricity to light up Soho. No clue how impressive that is.
7Ca1Cql.png
 
Something interesting tho Raimi and Avi Arad were highly involved in the making of the video games


9268289-img_3692.jpeg

9268293-img_3720.jpeg

9268291-img_3711.jpeg

Does anyone know if the Raimi game trilogy had any good feats?
 
Now that I think about it, maybe this Doom won't bé a variant but the OG Doom, he'll just look like Tony, might be an interesting idea
 
Having a variant of Iron Man as Doctor Doom is genius! Obviously, this won't be the Doom from the Sacred Timeline. Imagine the Avengers having to face a man with the same face as the one who saved them all from Thanos in battle. If they play this multiverse card right, this Avengers storyline will be emotional and carry weight. Imagine saving all of existence from a man wearing the same face as the one who started it all. I wonder if this Doctor Doom will have all the Infinity Stones and wield them with magic to avoid dying. If they bring back the Thanos that got dusted, it will be a bonus!

GTiluItW8AAWhOb
 
Last edited:
Based on how they phrased it, this isn't a variant of Tony but just a Doom that shares the same face. Like how Killmonger and Human Torch share the same face but aren't variants of each other. Same with Steve and the other Human Torch.
 
Based on how they phrased it, this isn't a variant of Tony but just a Doom that shares the same face. Like how Killmonger and Human Torch share the same face but aren't variants of each other. Same with Steve and the other Human Torch.
I saw the whole panel. They didn't mentioned his name to be Victor von Doom at all. They only talked about Doctor Doom, and for a sec I thought they were gonna slip and spoiled this character as a variant. Watch the panel again after RDJ comes on stage, someone is about to mention that in this "multiverse" there are multiple possibilities but stops and changes his dialogue quick.
 
I saw the whole panel. They didn't mentioned his name to be Victor von Doom at all. They only talked about Doctor Doom, and for a sec I thought they were gonna slip and spoiled this character as a variant. Watch the panel again after RDJ comes on stage, someone is about to mention that in this "multiverse" there are multiple possibilities but stops and changes his dialogue quick.

They say "if we're gonna bring Victor von Doom to the screen" literally right after they announce the movie
 
They say "if we're gonna bring Victor von Doom to the screen" literally right after they announce the movie

Since they're specifically mentionning Victor, it is possible this Doom won't be a variant and Doom Will just have the same face as Tony. That or Tony changed his name in this timeline
 
Last edited:
Based on how they phrased it, this isn't a variant of Tony but just a Doom that shares the same face. Like how Killmonger and Human Torch share the same face but aren't variants of each other. Same with Steve and the other Human Torch.
Oh, this then really reeks of racism
 
Back
Top