• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

KingPin0422

Derp Idol
Joke Battles
Retired
1,280
1,120
So, Infinity is rated as 2-C because he can absorb the space-time of a universe and stack timelines on top of each other.

However, he is only Low 2-C in durability for unknown reasons beyond being able to withstand the aforementioned space-time absorption. No mention about anything relating to the timeline stacking.

Weirdly, Mazinger Z is also 2-C for casually defeating Infinity. You know, despite the latter's Low 2-C durability.

I have absolutely no idea how stacking individual space-time continua is above Low 2-C. If it were, then surely Emn would be 2-B because he created someone who can one-shot someone who can destroy a stack of 10,000 universes.

What I'm trying to say is: depending on how timeline stacking (which I'd assume is different from timeline merging) is treated here, along with how the battle between Infinity and Mazinger Z went down, either Mazinger Z and Infinity should get 2-C durability, or they must be downgraded to Low 2-C all the way around.
 
Back
Top