Math and 1-A/High 1-A ill-definitions

[VictoriaGenesisBOA]

So, a Type IV multiverse is generally regarded as Low 1-A, but after some discussions and thinking, I think there are some problems:

1. Classical logic (Governed by three laws of thoughts), paraconsistent logic, fuzzy logic and every consistent logical structures, no matter any order, are indeed considered as mathematical structures, even though they are completely unrelated to calculations of lesser states. This will mean that the Type IV multiverse does include all possible worlds and is actually High 1-A+ Type 2.

2. Mathematical structures includes every formal syntax structures that are consistent, not only sum, union or permutation of lesser states. The definition of 1-A is the definition of calculations, not mathematics, and syntaxes can be used to express hierarchies, not just calculations, like High 1-A > 1-A > Low 1-A.

3. All Paraconsistency (Four truth values) and Fuzziness (Infinite truth values) can be emulated into classical logic through faithful translations.

 

[Ikelaggan]

I think your like a year or two behind for the type 4 multiversal stuff back when like 1-A and above used to follow in higher mathmatical logic for that to work. Now it's takes like qualitative superiority now to get 1-A almost in the era of old platonic concepts where the base reality is like a lesser real shadow to the true archetype.

 

[Frey_Starlight]

this can be closed, it can just be answered in q&a and if the op wants to do a new revision for type 4 multiverses, get a staff aproval and do it in staff thread.

 

[Ultimate-Rex1]

this can be closed, it can just be answered in q&a and if the op wants to do a new revision for type 4 multiverses, get a staff aproval and do it in staff thread.

I think you mean this should be change to Q&A

 

[Frey_Starlight]

I think you mean this should be change to Q&A

the OP already did ask in Q&A where i answered him, then i saw he made a crt as well.