- 6,108
- 963
I don't see why we don't just do it now. The profiles as they are are complete and utter garbage. And it's highly unlikely that any new feats will come around. And if they do... Under 200K+ need not applyEmperorRorepme said:
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Massive Nanatsu no Taizai Revision
- Thread starter Peter1129
- Start date
- Status
- 6,108
- 963
That's simple really. It's energy concentrated onto a small point rather than a larger area.Peter1129 said:
- 6,108
- 963
But it would likely cause more unneeded clutter than we want. So I think we just need to call those outliers and move on.
- 6,108
- 963
Galand cutting Tarmiel , Jude and a kid cutting Ban are the biggest outliers. So we should definitely ignore them.
- 10,948
- 3,133
- Thread starter
- #47
Also Unsealed Base Meliodas cutting Monspeet despite being heavily weakened. As well as Tarmiel and Sariel cutting up 3C Estarossa. And basically the entire flashback with the Ten Commandments vs Four Archangels 3000 years ago. Cause something being a plot point doesn't mean it isn't an outlier.
- 6,108
- 963
While it's true that using a blade or a spear can allow you to damage opponents stronger than you. That isn't happening when you've got High 7-A Galand and High 6-C Tarmiel. Or a 10-C Kid and 7-B Ban. So outliers.
- 6,108
- 963
Feel free to call in some calc group members. That's what we need right now.
- 6,108
- 963
Whenever I have calcs I'd like to have evaluated, I usually summon Mr Bambu, Therefir, or Zainybrainy
- 6,108
- 963
Sounds good
- 6,108
- 963
BTW for the Dandafor calc in particular. I'd recomend summoning Zainybrainy.Peter1129 said:
- 6,108
- 963
Alright. I hope that they look at the blog I made for the Dandafor calc, since it's not extremely complicated, and the owner of the blog is not banned.
- 6,108
- 963
Nice
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
- 22,787
- 22,314
I was summoned
gonna be looking over stuff and writing down thoughts here, I have no idea what this verse is and forgive the lack of knowledge, just got asked to look at the calcs/feats themselves
1. Gilthunder's storm is definitely a 5.89 considering the cyclone. For a "generic storm", that'd be 7-B. I disagree with DMUA that the cyclone forming in the sky is "mild".
2. Being hit by meteors is feasibly calcable, but you'd have to lowball into oblivion.
3. I can't offer opinion on Meliodas' stuff since that requires the context of the show rather than math-brain-things.
As for the actual links for the calcs, I assume they need eval'd and stuff, yes?
gonna be looking over stuff and writing down thoughts here, I have no idea what this verse is and forgive the lack of knowledge, just got asked to look at the calcs/feats themselves
1. Gilthunder's storm is definitely a 5.89 considering the cyclone. For a "generic storm", that'd be 7-B. I disagree with DMUA that the cyclone forming in the sky is "mild".
2. Being hit by meteors is feasibly calcable, but you'd have to lowball into oblivion.
3. I can't offer opinion on Meliodas' stuff since that requires the context of the show rather than math-brain-things.
As for the actual links for the calcs, I assume they need eval'd and stuff, yes?
- 10,948
- 3,133
- Thread starter
- #64
C ya
Alright so 3 out of 5 are done. And considering how Gilthunder is now casually 14 Megatons I guess Griamore's wall tanking meteors might not be needed since it will probably just be a supporting feat. So 4 out of 5 is done.
All that's left is to call in the NNT knowledgeable members to decide if pulverization should be used for the Danafor calc. Though I'm pretty sure even if the vaporization end was accepted it would be an outlier since nobody else in the series has any feats close to that level.
Alright so 3 out of 5 are done. And considering how Gilthunder is now casually 14 Megatons I guess Griamore's wall tanking meteors might not be needed since it will probably just be a supporting feat. So 4 out of 5 is done.
All that's left is to call in the NNT knowledgeable members to decide if pulverization should be used for the Danafor calc. Though I'm pretty sure even if the vaporization end was accepted it would be an outlier since nobody else in the series has any feats close to that level.
- 167,867
- 76,494
You can check the Knowledgeable Members List and the Nanatsu no Taizai verse page to find people to ask to comment here.
- 6,108
- 963
Ignore that comment claiming Liger's method was rejected. That other calc was never even accepted to begin with, and the result is just downright wank
- 5,420
- 1,068
The feat is definitely vaporization. There's no debris evident by exploration done in the hole by Hendrickson and co. I recall Meliodas doing so!during similar in the Vampire Arc and I recall there being vapour.
- 5,420
- 1,068
The feat is definitely vaporization. There's no debris evident by exploration done in the hole by Hendrickson and co. I recall Meliodas doing something similar in the Vampire Arc and I recall there being vapour.
- 6,108
- 963
No Pulverization can leave little evidence of debris as well. In terms of energy reducing rock to dust<<<<turning rock to vapor. In the scans we see no rising steam from the destruction of Dandafor.
Even if it were vaporization, it would be an outlier since nothing else in the series comes close.
Even if it were vaporization, it would be an outlier since nothing else in the series comes close.
- 5,420
- 1,068
Ok you make sense. I'll check the other instances but for now I'll agree with pulverization.
- 2,047
- 778
Agreed, it's Pulveration. There's dust coming from what I remember but that's often confused with steam so it's understandable to mistake it for vaporization. This is why I always think we should use colored scans for feats that involve vaporization and pulverization since they make the difference between the two much more clear.
- 5,420
- 1,068
You might be right now that I think about it and it would go well with the other scaling making more sense.
- 6,108
- 963
It can be difficult to differentiate steam and dust. Especially in manga panels. How I usually do things is consider if the character who did the feat, the attack they used is a heat based attack. Or has been consistently shown to vaporize things. In the case for darkness, we far more consistently see it pulverizing and v fraging things.
I just remembered an argument against the Dandafor feat being hellblaze. It would be contradictory in a way. Monspet is the best hellblaze user in the Ten Commandments, he's even more adept tat it than Meliodas. And I find it hard to believe unsealed Meliodas could create a column of Hellblaze bigger than anything Monspet has made.
I just remembered an argument against the Dandafor feat being hellblaze. It would be contradictory in a way. Monspet is the best hellblaze user in the Ten Commandments, he's even more adept tat it than Meliodas. And I find it hard to believe unsealed Meliodas could create a column of Hellblaze bigger than anything Monspet has made.
- 6,108
- 963
Lets wait another day or so for more people we contacted to give their thoughts.Peter1129 said:
- Status
Similar threads
