Marvel Rivals Discussion Thread

[Dalesean027]

Adding them up would reduce the result?

No seperating each individual pieces KE would reduce the result as they all have their own individual velocities but in your calc you just used the KE for the entirety oh the mass as a whole instead of the individual KE of each piece then adding them. I'll give ya an example

100kg of stone gets shot out at different velocities while being in 3 seperate pieces.

This is what you did:
0.5 * 100kg * 100m/s^2 = 500000 Joules

This is how ya should be doing it:
0.5 * 25kg * 10m/s^2 = 1250 Joules
0.5 * 45kg * 51m/s^2 = 58522.5 Joules
0.5 * 30kg *36/s^2 = 19440 Joules
Total energy: 79212.5 Joules

Because each piece has its own seperate weight and distance it travels in that timeframe you can't do the KE as a single whole which means the results will tank

 

[That_moron2]

Because each piece has its own seperate weight and movement it takes in that timeframe you can't do the KE as a single whole which means the results will tank

The K.E I did was for only one piece

 

[Dalesean027]

The K.E I did was for only one piece

Ah then it makes even less sense then since you used the diameter for a something that wasn't still the right diameter or movement for the piece you should have been using

 

[That_moron2]

Ah then it makes even less sense then since you used the diameter for a something that wasn't still the right diameter or movement for the piece you should have been using

Wolverine didn't destroy the top of the moon. The piece is the same diameter as the moon.

 

[Dalesean027]

Wolverine didn't destroy the top of the moon. The piece is the same diameter as the moon.

I didn't say its not, only for that invidiual piece though, you mixed and matched values for different pieces which is inflating you volume and speed, see my calc again those pieces aren't the same in diameter you should've used the one that was the full diamter ti find what you were looking for for the piece you were intending to use,

I'll math it rq and show you what the result you should gotten was

 

[Dalesean027]

3475km /182.04 * 144.68 = 2761.82707km
3475km /182.04 * 51.99 = 992.448088km
3475km /182.04 * 8.21 = 156.722424km
cap volume: = 3,249,339,562,345,609,297m^3 * 3344kg/m3 = 1.08657915e22kg

11 frames / 25 frames = 0.44s
156.722424km/ 0.44s = 356187.327m/s

0.5 * 1.08657915e22 * 356187.327^2 =6.89268290000000054e+32 Joules or 164.73907504780115119 Zettatons of TNT (Planet level)

 

[That_moron2]

3475km /182.04 * 144.68 = 2761.82707km
3475km /182.04 * 51.99 = 992.448088km
3475km /182.04 * 8.21 = 156.722424km
cap volume: = 3,249,339,562,345,609,297m^3 * 3344kg/m3 = 1.08657915e22kg

11 frames / 25 frames = 0.44s
156.722424km/ 0.44s = 356187.327m/s

0.5 * 1.08657915e22 * 356187.327^2 =6.89268290000000054e+32 Joules or 164.73907504780115119 Zettatons of TNT (Planet level)

Do you think K.E is good to use in this scenario or would I not be accomplishing anything by correcting it

 

[Dalesean027]

Do you think K.E is good to use in this scenario or would I not be accomplishing anything by correcting it

Im not sure myself hence why I did it as slicing instead of KE since idk if it seperated that fast or if that empty space is entirely the volume that he cut out with no extra movement.

High 6-A possibly 5-B would be how ya list that tho if we wanted to try and have the KE still

 

[That_moron2]

High 6-A possibly 5-B would be how ya list that tho if we wanted to try and have the KE still

I don't want to try cause doing all the pixel scaling for that was a pain in the ass

 

[Dalesean027]

I don't want to try cause doing all the pixel scaling for that was a pain in the ass

Lmfao completely understandable

 

[CharlesZaGreat]