- 873
- 661
Which chapter is this from?
I think this might be another case of out of context scans, but I could be wrong.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Maou Gakuin Discussion Thread
- Thread starter Oblivion_Of_The_Endless
- Start date
I think this might be another case of out of context scans, but I could be wrong.
- 4,773
- 2,574
183 iirc
- 873
- 661
This statement was talking about Nousgalia. Nousgalia's source was already destroyed earlier in this arc, and it was later stated that all gods, obviously including Nousgalia, can regenerate from source destruction.
Shin decided to divide Nousgalia's source endlessly, and after that seal him away, instead of completely destroying his source because Nousgalia can just regenerate after complete source destruction.
I am not sure if withstanding your concept (source) being divided endlessly qualifies as resistance to concept manip, but the source divide thing seems more like an incap technique IMO.
- 4,773
- 2,574
The point is,Nousgalia confidently believed that his source would not be destroyed by Shin and he was surprised when Shin can successfully do that in his first attack to Nousgalia's source,which means Gods can resist conceptual destruction
Also "It's the source of a god that will never perish" only means that source being killed even once is impossible,it doesn't say something like "will never perish permanently"
Also "It's the source of a god that will never perish" only means that source being killed even once is impossible,it doesn't say something like "will never perish permanently"
- 873
- 661
It seems like you're just misinterpreting statements tbh.
IMO, this doesn't qualify for resistance to concept destruction.
Again, this statement is saying that this god, not his source, will never perish. And earlier statements about gods being immortal because they can regenerate after source destruction support this.
You're gonna need better evidence for this "gods resist concept destruction" theory than just this one statement with multiple interpretations.
The only thing that could possibly qualify for resistance to concept manip from the above statement is the following, and I still doubt it actually does:
- 4,773
- 2,574
- 873
- 661
Immortal =/= indestructible.
This just further confirms what I've been saying all along. "The source of god is immortal" because gods can regenerate their source after complete source destruction, and not because their sources cannot be destroyed.
Lugh_Tuathe_Dé
He/Him- 3,706
- 2,077
Jerga isn't 5-A
- 109
- 42
this is just my thoughts. but, in my opinion jerga should be 5A with him actually quite a challenging enemy in volumes 1-3. Rating "likely" or "possibly" in my opinion is still appropriate
- 42
- 12
Yeah, I'm asking... not an opinion.
- 42
- 12
Private chat with me.
- 42
- 12
Chat with me on Facebook.
- 5,796
- 3,264
Guys, I'm starting to think that we could make a profile for the God Eques, I mean, it would be interesting how his Universal crush would play out in VS matches. Literally, being crushed by a 4-D force/Space-time continuoum.
- 11,317
- 19,823
Do you guys think the Anos range should be above baseline? I say this because IIRC deeper layers are somewhat inaccessible unless by X method, and the deepers it is the more inaccessible it becomes, so it would need more range than just normal 2-A? Although I know there's a problem with the 2-A range standards on the wiki right now, but it's just a question.
- 2,379
- 760
To what exactly are you referring to?
- 109
- 42
it should be, with the current structure of the silver sea
- 2,580
- 1,478
If his range is above baseline, his AP should be too
and considering how hard is now to get a 2-A AP above baseline it'll be so cool
- 11,317
- 19,823
His AP is already above baseline
- 7,142
- 4,658
You can only get higher Range in 2-A with very specific mathematical theories mentioned in the source. Regardless of locations being inaccessible to each other or a proven scaling chain you won't get any high in 2-A.
- 2,379
- 760
What mathematical theoris?
- 3,121
- 3,546
when this come out
- 11,317
- 19,823
Iirc we will possibly have some announcements in December so stay tuned
when this come out
- 4,059
- 1,713
bois, what does "Venuz GG" means? It turns up at anos debates.
- 5,796
- 3,264
Boiiiii you are ******* genious!!GG=Google so it's Venuz Google
- 16,264
- 10,713
Basically ''haha, venuzdonoa was summoned, get lost''
Venuzdonoa
The Reason Destroying Sword <Venuzdonoa> (理滅剣 <ヴェヌズドノア>, Rimetsuken <Vu~enuzudonoa>), the magic sword of the founder which is the destroyer of anything in all of existence. No matter how sturdy, how eternal, or how infinite something is, Venuzdonoa can destroy it - even Reason itself Venuzdonoa...
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 4,059
- 1,713
ah, basically it refers to venuz status as a "i ******* win" button.Basically ''haha, venuzdonoa was summoned, get lost''
Venuzdonoa
The Reason Destroying Sword <Venuzdonoa> (理滅剣 <ヴェヌズドノア>, Rimetsuken <Vu~enuzudonoa>), the magic sword of the founder which is the destroyer of anything in all of existence. No matter how sturdy, how eternal, or how infinite something is, Venuzdonoa can destroy it - even Reason itself Venuzdonoa...
- 16,264
- 10,713
- 4,059
- 1,713
at this point i am sure venuz can one shot the madoka verse.
- 16,264
- 10,713
Madoka has acausality type 5 + some hax that debatably can Incap Anos, and according to delta it is passive
