- 7,887
- 14,934
Both of these are from a fake interview, and aren't evidence.Mandrakk shows him as the literal ultimate evil, Anti-story itself, a 2-1 definition of the Overvoid
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Both of these are from a fake interview, and aren't evidence.Mandrakk shows him as the literal ultimate evil, Anti-story itself, a 2-1 definition of the Overvoid
I figured someone would say that, would you mind tagging user @MichaelJZero here?Both of these are from a fake interview, and aren't evidence.
They're all its “thought” as a result of it trying to speculate the mysteries behind the silent sentinel. Mandrakk is special because he was the “brightest and bravest of them all.”
That's Michael fabricating lies with an interview with Steve Orlando after the Unexpected series.This makes sense when most of the advertising for Mandrakk shows him as the literal ultimate evil, Anti-story itself, a 2-1 definition of the Overvoid, that side of God that doesn't want creation on it, which also makes sense, so him being called Entropy itself, makes sense with him being called the Ultimate evil.
Yup contradictory claim made by Dax Julius himself.He isnt really an embodiment of Ultimate evil, he kinda is ultimate evil itself.
He may be “superior” but that doesn't change his nature being a little off from the tier given. Realistically platonic concepts don't act like that especially if it's the full idea.Also im pretty sure we accept The Monitors as some type of platonic archetypes of a platonic world.
Whats up with that? Is Mandrakk not similar (if not superior) in existence complexity to Monitors?
Considering has hasn't been online for several weeks and has only posted on VSBW like twice this year, I don't imagine it'd make much of a difference. But he posted that interview quite some time ago and has never provided any evidence for it being real, so I don't see how that will change.I figured someone would say that, would you mind tagging user @MichaelJZero here?
Didn't claim it was, Orlando wrote Mandrakk stories thus should be seen as a WoG source for Mandrakk.it was with Steve Orlando
Secondary at best, but in the absence of evidence that Steve Orlando ever said such things, it's completely unusable.Orlando wrote Mandrakk stories thus should be seen as a WoG source for Mandrakk.
Not to mention the the story didn't even mention much of these ideals. If anything, Grant did it much better, and most of that stemmed from actual interviews and which sometimes contradict his own writing.Secondary at best, but in the absence of evidence that Steve Orlando ever said such things, it's completely unusable.
Yes. Tell me here when you are done please.@Antvasima can you unlock the Mandrakk page and I'll apply the revisions?