• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Honestly Mandrakk is alot of different things all in one. GM views the Monitors as the literal thoughts of the Overvoid, with Mandrakk supposedly representing the negative side of these thoughts, the side that wants to erase and destroy stories and whatnot
They're all its “thought” as a result of it trying to speculate the mysteries behind the silent sentinel. Mandrakk is special because he was the “brightest and bravest of them all.”
This makes sense when most of the advertising for Mandrakk shows him as the literal ultimate evil, Anti-story itself, a 2-1 definition of the Overvoid, that side of God that doesn't want creation on it, which also makes sense, so him being called Entropy itself, makes sense with him being called the Ultimate evil.
That's Michael fabricating lies with an interview with Steve Orlando after the Unexpected series.
He isnt really an embodiment of Ultimate evil, he kinda is ultimate evil itself.
Yup contradictory claim made by Dax Julius himself.
 
Also im pretty sure we accept The Monitors as some type of platonic archetypes of a platonic world.

Whats up with that? Is Mandrakk not similar (if not superior) in existence complexity to Monitors?
He may be “superior” but that doesn't change his nature being a little off from the tier given. Realistically platonic concepts don't act like that especially if it's the full idea.
 
I figured someone would say that, would you mind tagging user @MichaelJZero here?
Considering has hasn't been online for several weeks and has only posted on VSBW like twice this year, I don't imagine it'd make much of a difference. But he posted that interview quite some time ago and has never provided any evidence for it being real, so I don't see how that will change.

Regardless, the alleged interview wasn't with Morrison, it was with Steve Orlando, who wouldn't be an authority on the matter either way.
 
Secondary at best, but in the absence of evidence that Steve Orlando ever said such things, it's completely unusable.
Not to mention the the story didn't even mention much of these ideals. If anything, Grant did it much better, and most of that stemmed from actual interviews and which sometimes contradict his own writing.
 
Back
Top