• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

MAJOR Downgrade for Marvel and DC Heralds

Status
Not open for further replies.
After browsing the interwebs, I stumbled across these set of threads that hugely changed my perspective on Marvel and DC Heralds. It's clear that they are nowhere near as strong as commonly proposed when you factor in their highly consistent struggles with...
At what point do instances like these stop being called "Outliers" or "anti-feats" and just plain consistency? 30? 40? We're way past that. Users will propose upgrades with only a handful of feats, yet this is far more than a handful. It is clear that Marvel and DC Heralds have FAR more instances of being well below "solar system" than they do being anywhere near it.
 
Last edited:
For now, here's a condensed list for Thor (one of the more prominent heralds) from showings in those threads. Hover over each link for the source.

That's over 40 instances of a city level or below Thor. I'll get to the others later (who each have roughly the same amount of showings at this level)
 
At what point do instances like these stop being called "Outliers" or "anti-feats" and just plain consistency? 30? 40?
Well an anti-feat is just a showing that contradicts a proposed feat. Anti-feats themselves are feats most of the time, just lower than what people would like.

Superman struggling to lift a pyramid for example is a feat. It still weighs millions of tons. It's just an anti-feat if the proposed claim is that Superman is multi-planetary in lifting strength.
 
Well an anti-feat is just a showing that contradicts a proposed feat. Anti-feats themselves are feats most of the time, just lower than what people would like.

Superman struggling to lift a pyramid for example is a feat. It still weighs millions of tons. It's just an anti-feat if the proposed claim is that Superman is multi-planetary in lifting strength.

Exactly. People refer to instances such as the ones linked in those threads as anti-feats, when many of them in fact feature impressive showings. However, they hugely contradict the "solar system" meta for Marvel and DC heralds.
 
You can't just call anything that goes against your preconceptions bait.
Well he wasn't calling this thread bait. He was just asking if you're legitimately trying to downgrade people or if it'd just a meme thing. The latter is still relatively common with stuff like 1-A Superman or Outerversal Saitama.
People refer to instances such as the ones linked in those threads as anti-feats
No, they are indeed anti-feats if our ratings claim them to be consistent 4-B or 4-A. It's just that anti-feat as a term isn't what people here usually promote it as.
 
This is basically the people who scale street level characters to cosmic level characters, but the opposite. None of them understands the concept of the character. The concept of the character Thor is to be a cosmic level character, downgrading Thor to this level while in his most recent comics he killed what the comic said "the most powerful Galactus" is bullshit.

That's basically trying to upgrade Spider-Man to cosmic level characters while he can't move Loki with his punches.
 
This is basically the people who scale street level characters to cosmic level characters, but the opposite. None of them understands the concept of the character. The concept of the character Thor is to be a cosmic level character, downgrading Thor to this level while in his most recent comics he killed what the comic said "the most powerful Galactus" is bullshit.

And what determines the concept of the character? You? Did you have a chat with the creator of Thor? Thor's feats while amped by the Odin-Force are irrelevant (and even with the Odin-Force he's currently been less than impressive).
 
You’re probably WAYYY better off doing this 1 character at a time…

I have no idea why I’m supposed to think Superman is city block level because Thor is….

The threads feature showings for Superman as well along with a multitude of DC Heralds, but Superman and Thor did fight in a canon crossover and Superman barely beat him if you want to go there.
 
The threads feature showings for Superman as well along with a multitude of DC Heralds, but Superman and Thor did fight in a canon crossover and Superman barely beat him if you want to go there.
You missed the point of my comment
 
Jokes aside, your scans are missing sources, which means you have literally 0 clue about the contexts of most of this shit. Some inconsistencies exists, high and low, so that's why we are finding a middle ground, and something that is more consistent with the scaling.

All of the scans are cited. In both the threads and the link list I provided.
 
The comics themselves? You'll see Thor consistently being treated as such, same for Spider-Man. Just look at the difference between a street level character and a cosmic level one. One is limited to NY streets and wont have high feats like Thor, who is consistently trading blows and shocking planets and destroying them.

It's not hard to use your brain to think.
 
The characters being this weak doesn't make sense contextually, I'm afraid. While you can argue if Superman is Tier 4, 3, 2, 1, etc, him being below at least Ter 5 makes no sense for his character, as he's often seen as the strongest and mightiest of heroes, who often deals with threats on a cosmic scale

In addition, Superman has mental barriers that keep him from using all of his strength, which we oftne use to justify power-scaling but is applicable here as well
 
Sidenote but a lot of the Thor justifications make sense iin the proper context, for example this one This was in an era where if Thor was without his hammer for a few minutes, he would depower to that of a normal human, so he was falling in the volcano seconds before being depowered

Some f them aren't even Thor but Eric Masterson.
 
For now, here's a condensed list for Thor (one of the more prominent heralds) from showings in those threads. Hover over each link for the source.

That's over 40 instances of a city level or below Thor. I'll get to the others later (who each have roughly the same amount of showings at this level)
Y'know for users who like to claim Staff is the one that likes to downplay. There you go.

Most of this shit contradicts itself, it has Thor getting floored by 9-C shit and then immediately tanking 9-A durability crap. The selection of feats presented isn't consistent with itself, let alone it damaging current ratings, and it's using irrelevant trivial instances to yeet contextually more important ones.

Consistency isn't alone what matters, it's consistency with context. Read the Power-Scaling rules page on wiki.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top