Kirby71 said:
Ah yes i also mispelled the soul hax,you cant compare the HP system from undertale to another verse,also i forgot one thing,the durability negation does the same damage always but in proportion,i mean,what i wanted to say its that regardless of the durability of the oponent,you always need the same amount of hits to kill the enemy,so Sans wasnt one-shotting chara and needed a 5 seconds hit to kill chara,with magolor its the same,with durability negation he will need 5 seconds hit on magolor or any character susceptible to soul manipulation to win,but magolor will kill Sans before magolor gets bulldozed.
yea, but mag has no feats of tanking anything to the soul, burden of proof is on YOU
no, it does the same dammage, but maglor has no feat ir anything to belive he can tank it
if you ignore durabuluty all the amount of time to kill someone depends on theire healt, and inless you show it risk us above magolor
your logic is flawed in beliving that, naruto ignores dura,and can kill city busters with it, does it take more for him to kil a city level? or a wall level? does it take the same? well , the forest and threes he destroyed disagree
sans does a certain amount of dammage, and mago has no feat of tanking anything like that. by extension for him to last five seconds you need to assume his =chara, which is idiotic at best.
make a question board thread because you missunderstand how ignoring dura works
ill say it a LAST TIME: ignoring dura means that you do an amount of dammage no matter what (to a degree of course, if not it would be an nlf)
sans did enough dammage to kill a multiversal, by extension if he hits mago, hell be hit with enough power to kill a multiversal, which is ridiculosly stronger than him, he doesent tank for five seconds