Low 2-C question.

[Planck69]

I can't tell if you're joking or not. This was gone since 2019.

And it isn't always higher, this was even addressed in the tiering system revision thread.

 

[Arceus0x]

how

 

[Planck69]

Something something math something. Just go over the tiering system revisions, I'm pretty sure the threads can still be found.

 

[Arceus0x]

ah yes, something something math.
Dude, even an infinite 2D object is smaller than a microscopic 3-D object as the microscopic one will have weight. That is the difference between dimensions, one is a 0, the other a 1. The difference between a 0 and a 1 is infinite

 

[Planck69]

2-D objects can actually have weight from what I heard though.

In any case, I asked Ultima to comment.

 

[Arceus0x]

ok

 

[Peptocoptr27]

I just found this thread.

Tier 2 characters CRT

Summer times is the only good time to be starting mass projects to revise every profile of X tier and what not; second, Sera Ex still had plans to define the difference between 3-A and Low 2-C feats. And while yes, it is true that destroying an entire timeline is the requirement at what a Low...

vsbattles.com

It seems to adress this, but I didn't read through all of it.

 

[Greenshifter]

Planck’s right when it comes to spatial dimensions, at least following the wiki standards. I’m not sure about temporal dimensions though, after all you don't need to prove destroying a universal space-time is infinitely superior to destroying all matter in the universe.

 

[KernelRender]

Idk if this counts as necroposting...

-but the reason is because mass and energy are scalars, they are non-dimensional quantities and don't increase in magnitude with dimension. The fact that real life particles don't even technically have 3D shape or size may be bringing too much IRL physics into it, but most fictional universes don't use ideal puremath either, since they usually acknowledge atoms and such.

 

[SheevShezarrine]

So being able to destroy a space-time continuum that isn't universe sized doesn't qualify for low-2-C or even 3-A?

Destroying that kind of space-time is High 3-A, but only in instances where it's proven that infinite energy was required to affect/destroy/create it

 

[FluffyCreatureZ]

Destroying that kind of space-time is High 3-A, but only in instances where it's proven that infinite energy was required to affect/destroy/create it

In this case you get the tier because of you used infinite energy to destroy the thing not because destroying the thing requires infinite energy... I think.

 

[Peptocoptr27]

Destroying that kind of space-time is High 3-A, but only in instances where it's proven that infinite energy was required to affect/destroy/create it

Not seeing how that makes any sense. Can you show me an example of a character where this rule applies?