I got a question regarding the Tiering System.

[ZemmCayenne]

If an object only has quantitative superiority over the previous structure — for example, a universe that is simply larger and encompasses the entirety of the cosmology (including all High 1-B structures within it) — would that qualify for 1-A, or would it only be Low 1-A?

 

[ZemmCayenne]

Bump.

 

[Osemere]

Neither

 

[ZemmCayenne]

Neither

So, Low 1-A would not apply either?

What exactly would be required to qualify for it? Does it necessarily require some form of qualitative superiority/transcendence, or are there other valid ways to achieve the tier?

 

[AyOgUyS]

If an object only has quantitative superiority over the previous structure — for example, a universe that is simply larger and encompasses the entirety of the cosmology (including all High 1-B structures within it) — would that qualify for 1-A, or would it only be Low 1-A?

You cannot achieve 1-A with any amount of quantitative superiorities.

 

[ZemmCayenne]

You cannot achieve 1-A with any amount of quantitative superiorities.

Alright then. Thanks for the answer.

 

[ABSk4]

If an object only has quantitative superiority over the previous structure — for example, a universe that is simply larger and encompasses the entirety of the cosmology (including all High 1-B structures within it) — would that qualify for 1-A, or would it only be Low 1-A?

If the world is larger than universe H1-B, then the world would be H1-B (above the baseline) possibly H1-B+
I think it would be something like that, i'm not entirely sure right now

 

[Arceus0x]

It'd be higher into High 1-B. You can't reach even High 1-B+ with just a quantitive superiority. If it is a quantitive superiority over the entire dimensional space-time then with sufficient evidence it'll be Low 1-A.