• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Low 1-C neutral space dbs

Status
Not open for further replies.
GarrixianXD said:
I really just stated the neutral space is a difference concept and you asked for statements, and I gave it to you. The reason why it’s 5-D it’s pretty obvious, wiki standards and real-life theorems postulates otherwise.

Lol, I might have lots of characteristics you’re definitely gonna be disappointed about.
Click to expand...
You gave me a future Zeno from a wiki page?

How is that a definition of “evidence” I am asking for?
 
Damage3245 said:
Is there a summary of the most pertinent points that have come out of the discussion?
Click to expand...
Yeah the neutral space is a 5-D realm for surrounding all the 12 universe, with them being parallel to each other, we were arguing whether it was insignificant 5-D or Low 1-C. And we have been talking about temporal dimensions and the timelines also, i brought forth the point that since the neutral space is its own dimension which was stated in a scan, and said to be its own space, i said it would also have to have its own temporal dimension that overarches the macrocosms and the neutral space itself, so in total it would have to be qualitatively superior, so low 1-C. Which mind you is STILL under a bigger timeline also.
 
LuffyRuffy46307 said:
12 宇宙とは異なる空間に浮かぶ惑星
Planets floating in different spaces from that of the 12 universes

As I said before, calling "different space" (異なる空間), does sound more how they call what is generically here a different dimension, especially considering that they put stuff like the World of Void.

Also, looking into the complete scan



They put the nameless planet in the "neutral space between universes" in the same "space different from that of the 12 universes" as the World of Void and Zen'O palace. So yes, here it's completely in the meaning of a different dimensional space and can be used as proof that the neutral space between universes is like a "neutral dimension between universes", unless the World of Void is now seen just as another part of the same universal space that all 12 universes share and you can get there with a spaceship.

Translation by @Executor_N0 about the neutral space between the Universes
Click to expand...
 
ImmortalDread said:
You gave me a future Zeno from a wiki page?

How is that a definition of “evidence” I am asking for?
Click to expand...
It’s the Dragon Ball wiki so would it make sense for them to lie? Not to mention it blatantly occurs in the anime.
 
Damage3245 said:
Is there a summary of the most pertinent points that have come out of the discussion?
Click to expand...
A space which is apparently is a void that surrenders around the structures, which is by our definition 5D; but wiki interpret it as too insignificant to the point it is not low 1-C by our definition.

Someone here claimed it is a “different concept”, while refuses to send a proper scan to back it up, and here we go.
 
ImmortalDread said:
A space which is apparently is a void that surrenders around the structures, which is by our definition 5D; but wiki interpret it as too insignificant to the point it is not low 1-C by our definition.

Someone here claimed it is a “different concept”, while refuses to send a proper scan to back it up, and here we go.
Click to expand...


This is the neutral space after the timeline has been erased. Nothing but void and nothingness. Hence, insinuates a different concept.
 
I still don't see why would this void grants any qualitative superiority, and no I still don't view it differently to the space that we were talking before 2 pages ago.
 
ImmortalDread said:
I still don't see why would this void grants any qualitative superiority, and no I still don't view it differently to the space that we were talking before 2 pages ago.
Click to expand...
I only proven why it’s a different concept, like you asked.
 
TiltedFN said:
Yeah the neutral space is a 5-D realm for surrounding all the 12 universe, with them being parallel to each other, we were arguing whether it was insignificant 5-D or Low 1-C. And we have been talking about temporal dimensions and the timelines also, i brought forth the point that since the neutral space is its own dimension which was stated in a scan, and said to be its own space, i said it would also have to have its own temporal dimension that overarches the macrocosms and the neutral space itself, so in total it would have to be qualitatively superior, so low 1-C. Which mind you is STILL under a bigger timeline also.
Click to expand...
 
Lord_Farquaad69420 said:
correct me if i'm wrong but the neutral space should be 4D at bare minimum with the timeline being 5D? Or am I being dumb?
Click to expand...
The neutral space has its own bigger time flow which would supersede the neutral space and the macrocosms, that would be low 1-C via qualitative superiority, which mind you would still be under a bigger timeline.
 
TiltedFN said:
The neutral space has its own bigger time flow which would supersede the neutral space and the macrocosms, that would be low 1-C via qualitative superiority, which mind you would still be under a bigger timeline.
Click to expand...
when was it stated that the neutral space had its own time flow?
 
LuffyRuffy46307 said:
12 宇宙とは異なる空間に浮かぶ惑星
Planets floating in different spaces from that of the 12 universes

As I said before, calling "different space" (異なる空間), does sound more how they call what is generically here a different dimension, especially considering that they put stuff like the World of Void.

Also, looking into the complete scan



They put the nameless planet in the "neutral space between universes" in the same "space different from that of the 12 universes" as the World of Void and Zen'O palace. So yes, here it's completely in the meaning of a different dimensional space and can be used as proof that the neutral space between universes is like a "neutral dimension between universes", unless the World of Void is now seen just as another part of the same universal space that all 12 universes share and you can get there with a spaceship.

Translation by @Executor_N0 about the neutral space between the Universes
Click to expand...
 
It being a different space and dimension would imply it has its own time, as seen by the translations right here, different space meaning a totally different dimension. With a higher temporal flow, still under a timeline btw which is another higher temporal flow, this is at minimum low 1-C.
 
Lord_Farquaad69420 said:
correct me if i'm wrong but the neutral space should be 4D at bare minimum with the timeline being 5D? Or am I being dumb?
Click to expand...
Being the space that separates and contains 4d universes, it would be 5D minimum, but the issue is if it's 5D significant or 5D insignificant

Which would make the timeline itself an absolute minimum of 5D significant
 
TiltedFN said:
It being a different space and dimension would imply it has its own time, as seen by the translations right here, different space meaning a totally different dimension.
Click to expand...
hmmm, I'm of the opinion that the true timeline should be 5D, with the neutral space being 4D at bare minimum but I'm not sure the neutral space being 5D
 
Lord_Farquaad69420 said:
hmmm, I'm of the opinion that the true timeline should be 5D, with the neutral space being 4D at bare minimum but I'm not sure the neutral space being 5D
Click to expand...
It would make sense because its a completely separate dimension with a higher time flow, apparently its defaulted to insignificant 5-D, but the temporal dimension would give the entire structure that qualitative superiority, which is still under a bigger timeline, i can't see anything less than low 1-C.
 
Lord_Farquaad69420 said:
if the neutral space is accepted as 5D, then zeno destroying it (as shown when the background is the same as his palace instead of the neutral space) then he should be low complex
Click to expand...
Perhaps for Zamasu but not Zeno.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

  • Locked
Evidences that Bleach Garganta may be Higher Dimensional
Replies
0
Views
738
Mark2ain
  • Locked
Bleach - Garganta - Potential Evidence of been a Higher Dimension
Replies
20
Views
2K
ReaperAndBlues
ReaperAndBlues
Killerdrone123
  • Locked
"Smurfing through time" A Dragon Ball Super upgrade
6 7 8
Replies
284
Views
30K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Aolphl
Wang Ling (Donghua and Web Novel) Immeasurable Lifting Strength Downgrade (The Daily Life of The Immortal King)
2
Replies
52
Views
2K
ActuallySpaceMan42
ActuallySpaceMan42
Lort15
Alien x ability correction again
Replies
29
Views
2K
Lort15
Lort15
Back
Top