• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Logic Manipulation Ability Page Creation

Status
Not open for further replies.
@DontTalkDT only your opinion is needed to get into finishing this thread so we appreciate it or does the other thread about truth and paradoxes has anything to do with this one? Sorry for my ignorance, but I haven't had time to take a look at it. I've only seen that it also talks about logic.
 
Last edited:
Do we have enough approval to post this as a page? It seems that the main issues have now been addressed in Jin's sandbox, and everyone seems to agree with it.

I think the only thing left would be examples of more characters for the ability. @DontTalkDT will you create a new thread to evaluate whether the characters would qualify, as you did years ago with NEP? Or do you have any other examples, or either should we leave it as it is?
 
I would say first post the page. Then I can make a thread about adding it to characters. Once we have a number of characters with the ability, we can talk about adding more examples to the page.
 
Alright, So we got you, Agnaa, Ultima, Me, Viethai, do you think that's enough? Or should we @ the other administrators? I don't think it would be necessary because a general consensus has already been reached after more than a year of discussion, so I think it can be posted now, but I don't have the final say.
 
Okay, since those of us who were interested in discussing this topic have already reached a general agreement, I doubt there is anyone else who needs to express their disagreement, so I have taken the liberty of creating the page. Regarding the image that Agnaa mentioned, I did not remove it. If any of you have any issues with it, you can remove it or not; I am not really interested.
 
I'll remove the image if another staff member seconds my desire to delete it.
 
I'm going to close it now that the main objective has been achieved and the page has been created. All that is left is for @DontTalkDT to create the thread for evaluation and add more users to the ability and, therefore, to the page, when he has the time.

Thanks everyone.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top