- 12,239
- 1,112
Hyrule warriors like my good man.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Link vs. SCP-682
- Thread starter The_Wright_Way
- Start date
-
- Tags
- scp 682 scp foundation
- Status
- 15,332
- 7,563
Link is at 13-0 right now. This is 100% going to Link.
- 20,085
- 10,873
@Cal that doesn't mean he himself did it. By that logic, Tien seeing Master Roshi seal king piccolo would automatically count as him being able to seal at that exact time.
- 61,177
- 14,747
13-1, i still see no rebutal as to how he puts 682's 1-B conciousness down
- 15,332
- 7,563
This thread is a mistake.
- 8,998
- 2,927
Nobody agrees with Weekly on the 1-B thing.
Pretty sure generally speaking when we have a history of everyone among threads, users and staff alike among then, going against a point and one person going in favor of it, the side with everyone else is generally considered to be the right one.
So at this point I'm basically ignoring the 1-B "argument". It's not valid. Simple as that.
Pretty sure generally speaking when we have a history of everyone among threads, users and staff alike among then, going against a point and one person going in favor of it, the side with everyone else is generally considered to be the right one.
So at this point I'm basically ignoring the 1-B "argument". It's not valid. Simple as that.
- 12,239
- 1,112
Man Tien litterally tried sealing next chance he had.
- 61,177
- 14,747
682 is a 3-Dimensional shell with a Countless-Dimensional consciousness that does nothing other than exist, and as long as it exists, 682 technically cant be killedQuantu said:
- 19,123
- 6,335
Weekly tell me. As far as Link, or 99,99999999% of the 3-D characters are concerned.
What's the difference between "you have to beat 343" and "you need to beat 682's 1-B consciousness".
Both are equally, perfectly, completely impossible to accomplish for those 3-D characters.
So if the former gets restricted because asking a High 4-C to slaughter a 1-B is nonsense, what's the reason why killing his 1-B consciousness wouldn't be restricted?
Besides, we definitely do it for type 9 because i'm positive that the people fighting 3-D Mercurius aren't asked to kill his 1-A self.
What's the difference between "you have to beat 343" and "you need to beat 682's 1-B consciousness".
Both are equally, perfectly, completely impossible to accomplish for those 3-D characters.
So if the former gets restricted because asking a High 4-C to slaughter a 1-B is nonsense, what's the reason why killing his 1-B consciousness wouldn't be restricted?
Besides, we definitely do it for type 9 because i'm positive that the people fighting 3-D Mercurius aren't asked to kill his 1-A self.
- 61,177
- 14,747
@Kal One is type 8 immortality, the other is type 9. Thats the difference.
- 20,085
- 10,873
@J-Man Tien had to train to learn how to use the Mafuba.
- 12,239
- 1,112
Yeah? Litterally mafubaf next chance he had.
- 8,998
- 2,927
In a match like this, nobody does, pal.Quantu said:
Nobody does...
- 61,177
- 14,747
@Pachi 682's immortalities were both restricted against Kharn so no, he's not part of that group
- 61,177
- 14,747
Not buying it doesnt make it any less legitQuantu said:
- 665
- 53
I can't believe that Link is winning over the lizard.
And I vote Link fra ovo
And I vote Link fra ovo
- 333
- 42
Arguably Emps wouldn't even be able to erase a 1-B entity. He's only able to erase things to the point that 1-B entities can't bring them back. So if what Weekly says is true we might have to remove that matchup.
- 15,332
- 7,563
14-1.
- 61,177
- 14,747
So no one is going to give a rebuttal and is just blindly voting FRA. Nice. Good debating. 10/10
- 8,998
- 2,927
And yet again we get this discussion going the following manner:
Everyone else in the wikia: It isn't valid.
Weekly: It is.
Everyone else in the wikia: It isn't valid.
Weekly: It is.
- 15,332
- 7,563
Your point has already been debunked countless times, so yes, that's what going to happen.
- 61,177
- 14,747
Fate. Listen to me because im not repeating myself again. Unless you make it a rule, its not automatically restricted. We dont do unspoken/unwritten rules here.
- 61,177
- 14,747
No one has debunked itKepekley23 said:
- 12,239
- 1,112
Me myself neutral.
- 40,470
- 12,953
The countless-D consciousness is restricted into a 3-D body, which then gets restricted into a 3-D sword. Simple as that. 682 never transcended his sealed body before, and I don't see evidence that he ever did.
- 8,998
- 2,927
@Weekly Literally everyone else disagrees with you on that, in regards to this point... And this is not even the first time.
Every single time this discussion happened. Everyone else said no. It was always you saying otherwise with no one to back up for like one or two hundred replies.
The logic is faulty.
Every single time this discussion happened. Everyone else said no. It was always you saying otherwise with no one to back up for like one or two hundred replies.
The logic is faulty.
- 14,195
- 2,574
@Web please don't try to agitate Weekly
@Weekly I'm pretty sure it was a rule, if not a standard.
@Weekly I'm pretty sure it was a rule, if not a standard.
- 61,177
- 14,747
@SD Its not written on the rules page
- 15,332
- 7,563
Link: 14 or 15
SCP-682: 1
SCP-682: 1
- 19,123
- 6,335
Again, we definitely always do that for avatars and stuff too.
You don't need to kill High 1-B emperor to kill 4-A emperor.
You don't need to kill Low 1-C Lucemon to kill 2-C Lucemon.
You don't need to kill 1-C YHVH to kill 2-A YHVH.
You don't need to kill 1-A Mercurius to kill 4-C Mercurius.
You don't need to kill High 1-B emperor to kill 4-A emperor.
You don't need to kill Low 1-C Lucemon to kill 2-C Lucemon.
You don't need to kill 1-C YHVH to kill 2-A YHVH.
You don't need to kill 1-A Mercurius to kill 4-C Mercurius.
- 12,239
- 1,112
Weekly Man. Please.
- 61,177
- 14,747
@Kal Then make it a rule
- 61,177
- 14,747
The whole wiki can disagree with me and i'd still argue it because its not a written rule to restrict type 9 immortality automatically.FateAlbane said:
- 14,195
- 2,574
@Weekly I was really trying not to post this here because it won't look good on you, but thats been a rule here forever, something an admin should know.
"When making a match using a character that has Immortality Types 4 and 8 (Exclusively based on existing so long as a higher-dimensional being/entity exists) where the opponent has no way to bypass this, it is automatically restricted."
"When making a match using a character that has Immortality Types 4 and 8 (Exclusively based on existing so long as a higher-dimensional being/entity exists) where the opponent has no way to bypass this, it is automatically restricted."
- Status
