• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Link vs. SCP-682

Status
Not open for further replies.
@Cal that doesn't mean he himself did it. By that logic, Tien seeing Master Roshi seal king piccolo would automatically count as him being able to seal at that exact time.
 
@Weekly Could you explain why you are mentioning this "1-B" consciousness thing? Surely that would be restricted in lower tier fights?
 
Nobody agrees with Weekly on the 1-B thing.

Pretty sure generally speaking when we have a history of everyone among threads, users and staff alike among then, going against a point and one person going in favor of it, the side with everyone else is generally considered to be the right one.

So at this point I'm basically ignoring the 1-B "argument". It's not valid. Simple as that.
 
Quantu said:
@Weekly Could you explain why you are mentioning this "1-B" consciousness thing? Surely that would be restricted in lower tier fights?
682 is a 3-Dimensional shell with a Countless-Dimensional consciousness that does nothing other than exist, and as long as it exists, 682 technically cant be killed
 
Weekly tell me. As far as Link, or 99,99999999% of the 3-D characters are concerned.

What's the difference between "you have to beat 343" and "you need to beat 682's 1-B consciousness".

Both are equally, perfectly, completely impossible to accomplish for those 3-D characters.

So if the former gets restricted because asking a High 4-C to slaughter a 1-B is nonsense, what's the reason why killing his 1-B consciousness wouldn't be restricted?

Besides, we definitely do it for type 9 because i'm positive that the people fighting 3-D Mercurius aren't asked to kill his 1-A self.
 
"99,99999999% of the 3-D characters"

Guess who's that 0,00000001%?

Maxresdefault (1)kharn
I beg to differ.

500px-Emperor of mankind flaming sword armor
 
Arguably Emps wouldn't even be able to erase a 1-B entity. He's only able to erase things to the point that 1-B entities can't bring them back. So if what Weekly says is true we might have to remove that matchup.
 
The countless-D consciousness is restricted into a 3-D body, which then gets restricted into a 3-D sword. Simple as that. 682 never transcended his sealed body before, and I don't see evidence that he ever did.
 
@Weekly Literally everyone else disagrees with you on that, in regards to this point... And this is not even the first time.
Every single time this discussion happened. Everyone else said no. It was always you saying otherwise with no one to back up for like one or two hundred replies.

The logic is faulty.
 
@Web please don't try to agitate Weekly

@Weekly I'm pretty sure it was a rule, if not a standard.
 
Again, we definitely always do that for avatars and stuff too.

You don't need to kill High 1-B emperor to kill 4-A emperor.

You don't need to kill Low 1-C Lucemon to kill 2-C Lucemon.

You don't need to kill 1-C YHVH to kill 2-A YHVH.

You don't need to kill 1-A Mercurius to kill 4-C Mercurius.
 
FateAlbane said:
@Weekly Literally everyone else disagrees with you on that, in regards to this point... And this is not even the first time.
Every single time this discussion happened. Everyone else said no. It was always you saying otherwise with no one to back up for like one or two hundred replies.

The logic is faulty.
The whole wiki can disagree with me and i'd still argue it because its not a written rule to restrict type 9 immortality automatically.
 
@Weekly I was really trying not to post this here because it won't look good on you, but thats been a rule here forever, something an admin should know.

"When making a match using a character that has Immortality Types 4 and 8 (Exclusively based on existing so long as a higher-dimensional being/entity exists) where the opponent has no way to bypass this, it is automatically restricted."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top