• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Link vs. SCP-682

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thats not what 682 does though, heliterally does damage from having a memory of him, he doesnt physically attack, hell he doesnt even have to physically exist for the damage to manifest
 
And again, all Link needs to do is not look at the entity, or look through it with the Lens of Truth, and 682 can't attack through the memory.
 
There does, however, have to be the entity that implants the attacking memory of 682 into the target, but it falters due to Link's mind hax and Lens of Truth. Not to mention that 682 isn't gonna be strong enough to hurt Link due to the AP gap that won't be bridged.
 
The real cal howard said:
WeeklyBattles said:
<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://www.scp-wiki.net/experiment-log-t-98816-oc108-682">http://www.scp-wiki.net/experiment-log-t-98816-oc108-682</a>"><a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://www.scp-wiki.net/experiment-log-t-98816-oc108-682">http://www.scp-wiki.net/experiment-log-t-98816-oc108-682</a></a>

Item: <a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-3930">http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-3930</a>">SCP-3930</a>

Tissue Test Record:

SCP-682's tissue was brought into the void, and ceased existing.

Termination Test Record:

SCP-682 is introduced to SCP-3930, and successfully ceases existing. However, despite SCP-682 no longer existing, Foundation personnel still perceive SCP-682. When the entity is looked at, a vivid image or memory is recalled in the brain of personnel that is described as resembling the appearance of SCP-682. This entity has been observed "attacking" personnel, killing them, despite the fact that SCP-682 does not exist during these attacks. It should be noted that personnel killed in this manner died when their brains ceased to function, despite the appearance of "physical damage" occurring on their bodies. All destruction caused by this entity becomes "real", even if the entity that caused it didn't. 15 hours later, SCP-682 was found within its containment chamber. It is unknown how SCP-682 managed to gain existence after this incident.
Also, would happen only when 682 is destroyed, not immediately. Bseides, how much time did it take for the first kills to happen?
 
If Link doesn't allow 682 to adapt to his level, which given his tactical nature and advice from Fi and Ezlo, he wouldn't, even if this did work and get past his mental resistances, 682 wouldn't have adapted strong enough to hurt him.
 
>Allow 682 to adapt to his level

One High 4-C attack from Link is gonna make 682 adapt to his level or beyond
 
Im just gonna ask you all take a deep breath and think about your next post.

Please.
 
Speaking of SCP-682, when did he regenerate from him having his entire body destroyed, and only regenerated from a fragment of his mind?

Because if not, I want to bring SCP's Regenerationn stat into question.
 
Should probably be either closed with the current results being added in Link's victory as Cross would put it, skullf--- the grace period or simply closed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top