- 61,177
- 14,747
They can damage Link from having a memory of them?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Link vs. SCP-682
- Thread starter The_Wright_Way
- Start date
-
- Tags
- scp 682 scp foundation
- Status
- 40,470
- 12,953
Yes. They are literal nightmares that mostly take shape of Link's past boss battles.
- 61,177
- 14,747
Thats not what 682 does though, heliterally does damage from having a memory of him, he doesnt physically attack, hell he doesnt even have to physically exist for the damage to manifest
- 40,470
- 12,953
And again, all Link needs to do is not look at the entity, or look through it with the Lens of Truth, and 682 can't attack through the memory.
- 61,177
- 14,747
He doesnt have to look at it
- 40,470
- 12,953
There does, however, have to be the entity that implants the attacking memory of 682 into the target, but it falters due to Link's mind hax and Lens of Truth. Not to mention that 682 isn't gonna be strong enough to hurt Link due to the AP gap that won't be bridged.
- 40,470
- 12,953
- 61,177
- 14,747
Yeah, the memory, not something to physically look at
- 63,529
- 8,506
THIS THREAD IS SHIT
CLOSE IT
CLOSE IT
- 15,332
- 7,563
Gargo, don't.
- 12,239
- 1,112
>closing a thread.
>even after all bull.
No. Closing now would be a piss off.
>even after all bull.
No. Closing now would be a piss off.
- 40,470
- 12,953
If Link doesn't allow 682 to adapt to his level, which given his tactical nature and advice from Fi and Ezlo, he wouldn't, even if this did work and get past his mental resistances, 682 wouldn't have adapted strong enough to hurt him.
- 61,177
- 14,747
>Allow 682 to adapt to his level
One High 4-C attack from Link is gonna make 682 adapt to his level or beyond
One High 4-C attack from Link is gonna make 682 adapt to his level or beyond
- 8,998
- 2,927
Ever was actually right about this thread.
- 40,470
- 12,953
- 8,998
- 2,927
- 40,470
- 12,953
https://youtu.be/SPhiXmQCcW8
- 267
- 147
Speaking of SCP-682, when did he regenerate from him having his entire body destroyed, and only regenerated from a fragment of his mind?
Because if not, I want to bring SCP's Regenerationn stat into question.
Because if not, I want to bring SCP's Regenerationn stat into question.
- 12,239
- 1,112
- 12,239
- 1,112
Nice combo.
- 8,998
- 2,927
Should probably be either closed with the current results being added in Link's victory as Cross would put it, skullf--- the grace period or simply closed.
- 12,239
- 1,112
No crying till the end alrf.
- 61,177
- 14,747
Just close it, i dont even care enough anymore
- Status
