- 15,332
- 7,563
Uh, you don't. Like, at all.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Link vs. SCP-682
- Thread starter The_Wright_Way
- Start date
-
- Tags
- scp 682 scp foundation
- Status
- 61,177
- 14,747
WeeklyBattles said:
- 61,177
- 14,747
Will everyone please look at the comment because i edited it jeeezzz
- 40,470
- 12,953
When Hades vs The Emperor was a thing, Hades stomped.
- 8,998
- 2,927
@Weekly Not really.
Bringing this whole higher dimensional thing everytime despite everyone else always saying it's not allowed is getting really old...
Bringing this whole higher dimensional thing everytime despite everyone else always saying it's not allowed is getting really old...
- 61,177
- 14,747
WeeklyBattles said:
- 61,177
- 14,747
Then make it a rule because people saying its restricted when there's no rule saying it is is getting really oldFateAlbane said:
- 40,470
- 12,953
Does 682's "essence" have any feats of doing any of these things anyway? From all I know, he was reduced to a 3-D being from his countless-D self.
- 10,394
- 3,348
This thread is trash.
- 61,177
- 14,747
His essence is literally his disembodied former self as a 1-B leviathan trapped in a 3-Dimensional shell by 343The real cal howard said:
- 15,332
- 7,563
Prequel Homie said it like it is.
- 61,177
- 14,747
Go for itYobobojojo said:
- 40,470
- 12,953
- 8,998
- 2,927
When the person doesn't add a thing to the discussion then throws a random comment.
Sorry for pointing this out, Ever, but with this kind of attitude, you have 0 rights to call the thread trash.
Sorry for pointing this out, Ever, but with this kind of attitude, you have 0 rights to call the thread trash.
- 20,085
- 10,873
Btw, which tier is being used for 682???
- 10,394
- 3,348
I'm calling a spade a spade.FateAlbane said:
This thread is a mess, though honestly any thread with over 100+ replies are.
Now we're just discussing the legitimacy of a rule, not even the actual battle (I know it's related to the battle but that's not my point).
- 20,085
- 10,873
Then isn't this a mismatch? Cause Link oneshots in his first two tiers, then SCP one shots in his higher tiers.
- 8,998
- 2,927
@Ever See, this I can agree with especially when said "rule" is basically common sense at this point.
Either way, the match itself is pretty much decided. More than 10 votes for Link with next to none for 682.
Either way, the match itself is pretty much decided. More than 10 votes for Link with next to none for 682.
- 61,177
- 14,747
@Fate Considering no one has given a rebutal as to how Link will deal with 682's 1-B conciousness, the votes are dubious at best
- 40,470
- 12,953
Given how base 682 beat Godzilla and Majin Buu and Rick Sanchez and Goku Black, it wouldn't be a stomp at all.
- 8,998
- 2,927
>>> 1-B thing again.
...*long sigh.*
...*long sigh.*
- 10,394
- 3,348
How about we all slow down, and each side lists the methods that can make the other win.
Then we counter it in an orderly manner and try and organize this debate.
Then we counter it in an orderly manner and try and organize this debate.
- 20,085
- 10,873
Btw, can anyone tell me how sealing is Link's go to move? He rarely uses his sealing technique at all.
- 8,998
- 2,927
What Ever said. For now, keep my vote as is based on what was discussed above, though I'm open for a change if fair enough reasons are given for 682 other than "You have to affect 1-B" stuff that is obviously banned.
- 61,177
- 14,747
Its not banned
- 61,177
- 14,747
Go ahead and make it a rule then because i already tried to and everyone said no
- 12,239
- 1,112
Nice.
Link fra implying he would seal for the duration of sba because 682 very likely would end up adapting eventually. When matters but eventually may not cut it thus link under an assumption sealing will work for sba.
Link fra implying he would seal for the duration of sba because 682 very likely would end up adapting eventually. When matters but eventually may not cut it thus link under an assumption sealing will work for sba.
- 61,177
- 14,747
No one has answered Glass' question of why Link would use sealing when he has almost never used it
- 12,239
- 1,112
He does though.
When needed.
When needed.
- 10,394
- 3,348
As I said, let's have both sides list each of the methods that the character can have to win, then they, in an orderly manner, counter the other.
It's better than individual questions lost in an abyss of other comments.
It's better than individual questions lost in an abyss of other comments.
- 8,998
- 2,927
- 61,177
- 14,747
So its in character for Link to lead with sealing against an opponent he knows nothing about? And this sealing would seal 682's 1-B conciousness?
- 20,085
- 10,873
No that's not true at all. There's only a couple of instances where Link has actually sealed his opponent. One was with Denise when he defeated him, and the other was with Vaati. Everyone else he just either incapacitated, they die from some random nonsense, or others have sealed the enemy for him.
- 12,239
- 1,112
No. Lead? No one said lead though.
No. But maybe long enough because like it or not. Link does not need ta seal forever. Just long enough.
No. But maybe long enough because like it or not. Link does not need ta seal forever. Just long enough.
- Status
