• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Link revisions

8,377
3,045
AKA, how to edit Link in a way to keep him in the wiki.

Basically, we'll edit it as to make it follow the same structure as pages like Mario or Kirby. First off, we divide his abilities into keys, just like this thread (this is the page) already tried to do. I was initially against it as, well, it was "Composite" Link, but now that we're "decomposing" Link, this is necessary, as well as separating "Standard Equipment" (which is basically just the normal Master Sword and the Triforce of Courage, both of which already have a page so easy stuff) from his "Optional Equipment".

Secondly, these keys would be tiered separately. I'm unsure about the "innate abilities" (I'm guessing "At least 6-C, likely 5-A" is fine, considering the first one is fodder level and 5-A is Hero's Shade level, who has effectively no empowering equipment), but Standard Equipment would be "At least 5-A, likely High 4-C" (the same tier as the Master Sword and ToC), Optional equipment is 3-A for the Golden Master Sword and lastly The Triforce key is 3-A because Triforce. Again, pretty easy stuff.

Obviously the division for the equipment must also be made into the equipment section.

Lastly, changing "Link (Composite)" into just "Link" or "Link (Spirit of the Hero)". I honestly prefer the first one because it's less confusing for those who aren't a fan of the series, even if the second one is technically more appropriate given that what this is, at the end, is effectively making a page for "The Spirit of the Hero" more than "decomposing" Link. It wouldn't count as a composite anyway since he's an actual character of the verse, and assuming otherwise is simply contradicting the lore. Nintendo itself considers Link a single guy as shown on the official website or Hyrule Encyclopedia, and while it's hard to explain with words, there's a reason why every single wiki with Link has a single page for him. Obviously this also means we would need to nuke the different pages for the canon Link, as he's effectively always the same guy.
 
It might be better overall to just call him Link, though I don't mind either way. And the proposals in the OP looks good.
 
If we're doing this, I think we should separate his equipment into separate tabbers in the optional equipment section. Maybe by incarnation (NES Era, Hero of Legend, Etc.)

On that note, we should really have images for his stuff.
 
DarkDragonMedeus said:
It might be better overall to just call him Link, though I don't mind either way. And the proposals in the OP looks good.
At the very least it should be "Link (The Legend of Zelda)", as "Link" alone can likely be confused with other characters of the same name (Unless there aren't any in the first place, in which case just "Link" would be fine).
 
TBH, while we are at it, I still think Mario should have his page named something like "Mario (Mario Bros.)" or even "Super Mario", the same also should apply to Luigi, but that´s out of the topic.

At this point it seems every current ("canon") Link page is going to be merged into a single profile, oh boy, this is going to turn into one of the top 10 longest pages on the wiki.
 
TriforcePower1 said:
Its size won't change much from what Composite Link is now.
I'm working on the page already. It might be if we actually use images... which we really shood, the composite page is sorely lacking in them.
 
Outside of your blog having weird categories (They aren't meant to even have them), the optional equipment tabbers should be merged into a single "family" of tabbers, and you probably should have a gallery at the bottom showing each canon Link incarnation.
 
Bobsican said:
Outside of your blog having weird categories (They aren't meant to even have them), the optional equipment tabbers should be merged into a single "family" of tabbers, and you probably should have a gallery at the bottom showing each canon Link incarnation.
It's a sandbox, not a blog. I used it for an attempted fate revision a while back.

What do you mean by a "family" of tabbers?
 
Basically, both being in the same tabber.

You know tabbers can be actually stacked (Tabber in another tabber), right? Hence why I said it like that.
 
In either case, I think the basics are set out. His powers and abilities section are complete in any case. Once things here are set we can begin the transition.
 
What should we do for reoccuring equipment? Things like bombs, a bow and arrow, boomerang, and hookshot are all pretty famous for Link, and he's always represented with them in auxillary media like Smash,Soulcalibur, and Hyrule Warriors. Can that be treated as standard equipment?
 
I don't get this, to be honest.

I can't see why the kwys Link would be divided into would not be the different games. It's the most logical cut-off point for him, both from tier and ability standpoint.

I guess people really want a singular profile for Link for some reason, but it really seems like all the different game profiles already stand for what his keys should be.


But, I mean, fine if you want to just delete all other profiles. Same difference I guess.
 
Yeah seems pretty bizarre to me as well to delete all the other profiles rather then just axing this one...But they're effectively the same so you guys do you.
 
You are not making a profile for a character with all that, and then making 19 profiles for the same character at different times in their lives.
 
So either we get this single link profile or we keep the multitude of others and simply axe this one. Which is honestly the version im In favor of, compiling link like this does nothing and serves no purpose. All it will do is lead to one massive messy profile with a bunch of keys/tabbers everywhere.
 
Ok first of all, I've done too much work to have it axed like this. And no, i absolutely prefer the one link profile. Vs matches can just limit him to whatever equipment.
 
Well then we delete all the others and replace it with this mess of tabbers and keys that serves no purpose since we already have profiles for the individual links.

You can prefer it I don't, its effectually the same as axing the profile, functionally the only difference is we get one mega messy profile, rather then a bunch of individualized profiles.

Im personally in favor of keeping the individuals but I wont argue it massively just pointing out that this a very bizarre course of action to take.
 
Last time I check didn't the people on the link composite thread wanted to freaking axe all the other link profiles for absolutely no reason! hell they said the same thing as you but said that the other Link profiles served no purpose.

What do they even want?

We can all still change things and correct stuff as we go.
 
Yeah no, that's horrible reason.

The 19 profiles no doubt had a lot of effort put into them, are easier to look at, are more precise then the sandbox is right now (I don't even get why the keys are made like they are), and make one able to pick from the game they most liked.
 
Disagree those profiles are concise, yours has tabbers overlapping because theirs to much there, further people will have to sort through that mess to pick out which link they're using, where individual profiles don't suffer these issues. T

hey are clear on what that version of link can do, there's no searching through optional equipment keys to figure out which link your using. I fail to see the point in this mega profile.
 
AshenCrow777 said:
And they were ignored, this can't be. Composites aren't allowed and really should never have existed on the wiki. We are getting rid of composite link regardless of anything else, this is just a very bizarre way to try and compile all links into a single profile because...Reasons?

I really don't grasp the point of this course of action, its effectively the same thing just more messy.
 
Back
Top