- 11,050
- 19,429
Lille Barro has several weaknesses in his Weaknesses section of his profile I disagree with, and believe should be removed as they either presume a weakness that is never stated or shown to be true, or just blatantly make things up.
So let's delve into them:
In this explanation, it's assumed that Reality Manipulating abilities like Shunsui's Bankai, by its nature alone of being a Reality Warping ability, is the reason why his Bankai could affect Lille passed his Intangibility; and this is extrapolated to any other Reality Warping ability because of it. I fundamentally disagree with this since it presumes Reality Warping in itself, without further qualities, can bypass Lille's Intangibility. Not that Shunsui's specific application of Reality Warping is the cause of it. We're shown in Lille's fight against Shunsui that his Shikai, which directly warps reality by bringing forth children's games and provides them actualized power in reality, is completely useless against Lille's X-Axis. So we have direct evidence of the contrary to this interpretation, and as such, we should reformulate that explanation to match this fact.
Lille never comments on the brightness of his light causing himself blindness. What is stated is that, because of the reflective nature of Shinken Hakkyōken, Lille can't perceive the blade of it because of his light obfuscating its form, which is significantly different compared to what is explained on the profile. I can see why someone would intuitively believe that if the light reflected off the sword was bright enough to cover its blade, it would temporarily blind him because it was reflected back into his eyes. However, I reject this intuition because nothing implies, outside of speculation, that he is being blinded by the light. His eyes just didn't like the sight of the light, so he commented on him not liking it. Simply as.
With this, I believe the initial explanation should be reformulated to conform with what is more likely to be true, while the second one should either be completely removed or a more accurate explanation should be given in its place.
Voting:
Agree - @LordTracer, @TheRustyOne (Point 2), @LephyrTheRevanchist, @Damage3245
Disagree - @TheRustyOne (Point 1)
Neutral -
So let's delve into them:
After achieving Vollständig, while he is immune to most attacks, he is not immune to reality manipulation attacks, such as Shunsui Kyōraku's Bankai, which caused a disease to appear on his body, and made him share his wounds.
In this explanation, it's assumed that Reality Manipulating abilities like Shunsui's Bankai, by its nature alone of being a Reality Warping ability, is the reason why his Bankai could affect Lille passed his Intangibility; and this is extrapolated to any other Reality Warping ability because of it. I fundamentally disagree with this since it presumes Reality Warping in itself, without further qualities, can bypass Lille's Intangibility. Not that Shunsui's specific application of Reality Warping is the cause of it. We're shown in Lille's fight against Shunsui that his Shikai, which directly warps reality by bringing forth children's games and provides them actualized power in reality, is completely useless against Lille's X-Axis. So we have direct evidence of the contrary to this interpretation, and as such, we should reformulate that explanation to match this fact.
In his true Quincy: Vollständig form, his body reflects light strong enough that if it's reflected towards him, it can leave himself blind for a short period of time.
Lille never comments on the brightness of his light causing himself blindness. What is stated is that, because of the reflective nature of Shinken Hakkyōken, Lille can't perceive the blade of it because of his light obfuscating its form, which is significantly different compared to what is explained on the profile. I can see why someone would intuitively believe that if the light reflected off the sword was bright enough to cover its blade, it would temporarily blind him because it was reflected back into his eyes. However, I reject this intuition because nothing implies, outside of speculation, that he is being blinded by the light. His eyes just didn't like the sight of the light, so he commented on him not liking it. Simply as.
With this, I believe the initial explanation should be reformulated to conform with what is more likely to be true, while the second one should either be completely removed or a more accurate explanation should be given in its place.
Voting:
Agree - @LordTracer, @TheRustyOne (Point 2), @LephyrTheRevanchist, @Damage3245
Disagree - @TheRustyOne (Point 1)
Neutral -
Last edited: