- 16,949
- 12,033
Basic human curiosity? Being smart enough to connect dots?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Law vs Garnet
- Thread starter AquaWaifu
- Start date
- 16,949
- 12,033
Pretty easily actually. Gems have no organs or anything like that correct? So whenever he uses Scan the only thing he'd see inside her body is her Gem. It really doesn't take a rocket scientist to connect dots here Aqua.
- 16,949
- 12,033
It's really not a high ball assumption. He sees one thing inside her body and takes it out.
- 16,949
- 12,033
The reason why they are fine is because Law typically uses that as Black Mail to gain leverage. Example, just like how he did with Smoker and Ceaser. However this is a fight and Law would have absolutely no reason to black mail Garnet with her Gem.
- 16,949
- 12,033
No he wouldn't. That's something Luffy would think and unlike Luffy Law is extremely smart.
- 16,949
- 12,033
No it's literally basic logic.
Law will see that she has nothing in her expect a single gem. Curiosity strikes and he removes it.
Law will see that she has nothing in her expect a single gem. Curiosity strikes and he removes it.
- 16,949
- 12,033
Even better because he'll remove both of them. Plus I don't really see the point you are trying to make whenever people are telling you this is likely a hax stomp. Garnet cannot win this at best she can run away.
- 1,226
- 192
We might have to close this soon bc the SU character's are about to get some big upgrades. Garnet will be 6-B
- 3,295
- 369
I actually think the reverse because with the higher ap, garnet has a chance.Gojira1234 said:
Unless Weekly wants to close this because upgrades.
- 1,226
- 192
I think it'd be better to close it in that case bc it gives Garnet a significant AP advantage
- 3,295
- 369
Not enough because Law still one shots fairly effectively.Gojira1234 said:
But of course, I will let Weekly decide.
- 1,226
- 192
How can he oneshot when Garnet's durability goes up as well?
- 3,295
- 369
Room Ignores Durability...Gojira1234 said:
It allows you to replace souls with other bodies, cut people in half and take out their hearts/gems.
So there you go.
- 61,134
- 14,630
Once the upgrade goes through im remaking Garnet vs Whitebeard again
- 3,295
- 369
Oh boi you savage-WeeklyBattles said:
(I will probably vote for garnet tbh.)
- 61,134
- 14,630
Also, if Garnet's durability goes up, what is removing her Gem gonna do other than be an inconvenience for her?
- 3,295
- 369
He can very like cut the gem in half like someone can stab a mes heart.WeeklyBattles said:
In other words, if it doesnt poof, he can shatter it.
Generally speaking.
I lean to Garnet this time btw but imo it is still fair.
- 61,134
- 14,630
How? Her Gem's durability is the same as her.
- 3,295
- 369
Because Law's Room Ignores durability, he also sliced part of a meteor in half with his ability, not his AP.WeeklyBattles said:
It is like dimensional slicing, so he could ignore higher durability characters generally.
- 5,107
- 1,786
Hahaha... Law stomps this quite handily due to several hax that Garnet can not make up for. His Amputate will turn her into many pieces that he can telekinetically control, and his offensive abilities--even if he doesn't one-shot her, will eventually poof her. Garnet's only saving grace is her pre-cog, but it doesn't matter if she ends up trapped in his Room, because one single mistake will result in Garnet's fall. And she will fail to do anything simply due to Law's ability to use Shambles in order to teleport himself or Garnet to any position within the Room (so long as there are any objects present--which includes pebbles). Injection shot bypasses durability as well, and it's a physical attack that pierces the target.
Meanwhile, Garnet doesn't have anything in particular that Law can't defend against.
Law incapacitates, KOs, or even kills Garnet in every scenario.
This needs to be closed. It's like the Doflamingo vs Garnet thread where the only way Garnet can possibly stand a chance is if we begin restricting Law's abilities.
PS: "How does Law one-shot when Garnet has comparable/higher durability?" Simple--almost all of his attacks bypass durability, or are spacial attacks. Garnet has 0 defense against that, and she'd be lucky to land a punch on Law in his Room.
Meanwhile, Garnet doesn't have anything in particular that Law can't defend against.
Law incapacitates, KOs, or even kills Garnet in every scenario.
This needs to be closed. It's like the Doflamingo vs Garnet thread where the only way Garnet can possibly stand a chance is if we begin restricting Law's abilities.
PS: "How does Law one-shot when Garnet has comparable/higher durability?" Simple--almost all of his attacks bypass durability, or are spacial attacks. Garnet has 0 defense against that, and she'd be lucky to land a punch on Law in his Room.
- 15,059
- 9,236
from what everyone has said I'm going to vote inconclusive for now
- 5,107
- 1,786
I am genuinely confused why Law's powers are not made apparent in almost all of these threads. His Powers and Abilities section does seem kind of inaccurate. I'll fix it.
- 7,330
- 1,301
I don't see how this is a match and how people are arguing against the idea that Law can ignore durability.
- 5,107
- 1,786
@Aqua - You are missing the point entirely. Law using Amputate to disassemble Garnet's body will render her incapacitated, or at least in a crippled state. He can then follow up with a Counter Shock or similar ability to Poof her and then proceed to shatter her gem. She stands no chance here.
Only his Amputate and Radio Knife are spatial attacks. Counter Shock is electricity, Injection Shot is impalement, Gamma Knife is Energy-based, and he has physical attacks.
Only his Amputate and Radio Knife are spatial attacks. Counter Shock is electricity, Injection Shot is impalement, Gamma Knife is Energy-based, and he has physical attacks.
- 7,330
- 1,301
I mean technically... from what Law can do he can just undo whatever 'Room hold' he has on a target and they'll probably end up being splattered or truly cut into pieces at that point.
- 1,959
- 131
Law FRA
- 3,295
- 369
If that were true he'd be practically unstoppable.
IIRC his devil fruit has a time limit, but this is rarely explored unless he is tagteamed. I honestly doubt Garnet could survive a room to the face. It is just hax. It isnt called the 'Ultimate Devil Fruit' for nothing,
- 5,107
- 1,786
@COB - Uh... no... he has never done that before... jeez, people making up fake abilities.
- 5,107
- 1,786
@Aqua - Because after the first time defeating her, he'll either win via KO since gems take either seconds or days to heal, or once Garnet comes back, Law will understand that the gem is the life-line since... you know... that's all that remains when the gem is poofed.
I'm going to have this thread removed.
I'm going to have this thread removed.
- 7,330
- 1,301
It's not a made up ability. And it's not like the situation changes if you add or ignore my ability anyway. It's just the same as teleporting part of someone's body into another point. Judt theorizing anyway. Agreed on your last msg first paragraph though.
