Oh, my dear Lordy, I hasten to inform you that LS, in addition to the value of how much weight you can lift, also shows the amount of force that you can produce. Impact force, throw force, compression force. All this has been used on the wiki for a long time. I also hasten to inform you that in order to move 60 million tons of matter, you need to hit with the appropriate force. Think about it at your leisure))))
Yeah and literal none of what you said is how we do things around here. I'd hate to inform you that you have been misinformed about our lifting strength standards. Quite frankly your personal opinion on how we scale lifting strength is irrelevant as this is the accepted principle.
>Again this is well, just false as well. King's original calc works by scaling the amount of dust Ohma kicked into the air, the distance between them and the mountain is irrelevant as first of all, they aren't far from the mountain.
Is that why he measured the mountain in order to scale the explosion from it?
Not sure what you even mean by this, so I'm just gonna ignore it until you make more comprehensive sense.
>Secondly you act as if he assumes the dust hit the mountain, which he didn't do in the current calc. That's for how far Ohma sent the dust flying into the air, I.E aerial coverage.
Did you come up with what I meant and refuted it yourself? Cool story, Lordy)))
I didn't refute myself at all, you should learn the proper definitions of words before applying them in such a manner.
It does not matter whether the dust falls on the mountain or not.
Nobody is arguing the dust fell onto the mountain, what the actual **** are you even talking about?
There is too much distance between them to scale.
No there isn't and I've already proven so via scans.
Moreover, we don't even know if this is the whole mountain or just the top of it, in order to scale it as 603 meters.
Nobody assumes the dust traveled up to all 603 meters. The dust got kicked up a few hundred feet. How's about you drop your everso obvious strawman fallacies? At this point your tyring to argue against things that nobody is even discussing.
We also often see the position from the ground and clearly observe the size of the trees. If the length of the dust column is more than a kilometer, then the trees and crowns should be colossal. But this is not the case.
I've already proven the size of those tree's, they're indeed colossal as they're comparable to a portion of the mountain. You saying "that is not the case." isn't a real argument. You provided zero citation and just act as if whatever you say is set in stone, this isn't how debating works.
Moreover, in this case, it turns out that the distance of Ohma's attacks is more than a kilometer, which is absolute nonsense and has never been demonstrated in the manga.
Expect it was demonstrated in it's first literal usage. It doesn't need to travel the same distance over and over again, Demonsbane is a counter that utilizes the opponent's attacks back at them. It can vary depending on the opponent in question, Demonsbane can reflect up to 7-C levels of damage. Again, before you say something is absurd nonsense prove it. Because thus far the only absurd nonsense is your sheer dismissal of evidence.
In the last chapters, Fey attacks Akatsuki with his blood at a distance and everyone perceives this as something abnormal. I wonder why the characters here even go out for a full-contact battle, if their shock waves spread for hundreds of meters?)
Fei's blood splatter is used as a tool of harassment similar to Akoya's Ripper. It doesn't deal damage, it's meant as a distraction which is literally stated in the fight.
Oh, these cool stories, Lordy))
>Last but not least your version of the calc isn't usable as your using a ground based explosion formula for something that isn't even originated from an explosion. Preferably know what your even talking about before you attempt to criticize other calculations due to the fact that you severely lack an understanding of what's even being calculated.
You should have known that the wiki has long been used to calculate the force of shock waves through the explosion formula. The same OPM profiles. The previous version of this calculation also used this. But you're the smartest, right?
Ohma isn't creating a shockwave there, so again this is irrelevant. There isn't any explosion nor shockwave involved in this feat. And how's about you drop the attitude huh?
>He provided a literal EDU document for the source. You saying that it's "too high." whenever KingTempest's calculation uses an actual verified citation for the density of the dust knocked up into the air. You also made a major mistake in assuming it's ground up soil, it cleary isn't. The dust present is the result of wood pulverized and such from the trees, not simple soil. Also what? You just contradicted yourself. "Dust can have that density in the bulk state." what Ohma did is exactly that, he kicked up a bulky cloud of dust. Ignoring the fact that you've blatantly ignored his citation and sources, and instead used your own density of dust that you seemingly got out of nowhere.
If you read this article and searched the Internet, you would understand that the density of dust in the compressed state and the density of dust in the air are not the same thing. Let me tell you so that you understand. Take a glass of sand or flour. A large such mug or jar. Now the substance occupies a certain volume and has a high density. And now abruptly throw it up. Flour or sand hang in the air. Now they take up a much larger volume. Let's take a conditional cubic meter. Would you say that 700 kilograms of flour is flying in the air right now?
Thanks for the elementary school physics course, none of what you said is applicable to the case here. Your assuming this a dust that's derivative from soil, whenever that isn't the case. The dust here comes from wood debris. I'm not even gonna spend time on this comparison, it's the equivalent of comparing apples to oranges. The two circumstances are different from one another. King's calculation isn't even using the density of compressed dust, so again your just bringing up irrelevant points.
It is incredibly funny to me that you assume that a cubic meter of dust flying in the air weighs almost two tons.
I have already given an analogy in the comment above. Such a loose substance consisting of the smallest particles occupies a different volume when compressed or being in the air.
The density of the dust that you took implies the density of the fluid substance. That is, imagine a full barrel of sand and dust. This is relevant here.
But this same mass of dust, being as dense, cannot hang in the air, just as cobblestones cannot hang in the air from a breeze.
Irrelevant whenever said analogy is flawed due to you using the basis of KingTempest's calculation using compressed dust whenever the calc doesn't do so to begin with.
Sure. I will do this immediately after Lordy stops treating me subjectively. I fully understand and accept that he left a complaint about my profile, because I did not know that a CRT was conducted.
Then do your research. You not knowing one was conducted is your own fault to be frank. It takes two seconds to find a CRT, and I even linked said CRT in the profiles as a reference. You went in and undid the edits, meaning you definitely saw the CRT I linked even if you didn't click it. I'm not treating you subjectivity either.
But after a lot of obscene language flew in my direction, and the participant himself began to actively comment on my calculations, reinterpreting my words, writing me what I did not say and calling my calculations wrong as rudely as possible, so that when reading the comment you initially did not take them seriously.
Oh please, this has to be one of the biggest overreaction's I've seen. You're an adult you can handle "obscene language." that wasn't even targeted at you. And none of the comments I've made on your blog are rude, that's my tone of talking. Me telling you to know what your talking about isn't rude, that's me being upfront with you since you have blatant misconceptions.
I don't quite understand how you seriously don't notice such simple manipulations.
"Manipulations." is a very strong word considering you had user's change Kengan pages on your own accord. That's verbatim the definition of Manipulation.
In my calculation, I quoted King's calc, stating the dry facts of his mistakes. Lordy started commenting on my calculation with the words that I don't understand what I'm saying and I'm talking nonsense.
"Dry facts." Yeah no, you didn't state any dry facts. Nobody here aside from Life agrees with you and even he doesn't fully agree with you. Stop acting as if your word is law, again this is not how a debate works.
vsbattles.fandom.com
