- 16,959
- 4,855
And here is where the first huge problem comes from, as said before multiple times. You are going off of "could", "could be" and "maybes" as the basis for your argument to argue against this, despite those scenarios not having a shred of evidence to even remotely imply that they are the case in the first place. And realistically, it makes no sense to even think the light shown in a real natural dimension isn't natural itself.Could just be esthetic or part of the dimensions design. Off course the author isn't going put them in a dimension with no light doesn't automatically mean the light is from a star. Their is many other factors that could be at play here. Add to the fact the data book says it is going to destroy the world/planet
Never stated to be a natural light source
For one, Kaguya has no means of creating any artificial light source and lacks the intelligence to do so. This point was brought up before when others tried discrediting her dimensions having a real star and it was debunked to death. Lets not return to the 2017-18 era when this happened please.
Secondly, the default assumption would be that the light source is from a star, you need an actual reason to deduce that the light source is fake, which there isn't. Offering another scenario that is unsupported, lacks support, and has a weaker basis than the dimensions having an actual star, means literally nothing.
Third, lets use a thing called common sense. If any of Kaguya's dimensions have actual celestial bodies and stars inside of them (which at least 1 or 2 of them most definitely do), why in the hell would you make these leaps in logic to argue the other dimensions wouldn't? Thats stacking assumptions on top of each other that makes no sense and increases the Occams razor and simple idea that all of the dimensions would have the same thing.