- 689
- 438
Actually there were a few agreements, but the number of disagreements are far greater. But yes this is very circular.This is quite literally circular argumentation, this has had absolutely no agreements so far.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually there were a few agreements, but the number of disagreements are far greater. But yes this is very circular.This is quite literally circular argumentation, this has had absolutely no agreements so far.
How is it circular?Actually there were a few agreements, but the number of disagreements are far greater. But yes this is very circular.
... There have been. I told you mine, others have also said theirs. You have literally argued against mine.Where... and yes people agreed earlier on in the thread... and for the millionth time, nobody has substantiated why it should be a real bullet, while I have a preponderance for it being NOT
Do you even know what Kanji is? That's like asking a foreign person "can you show me that they used "breathe" when they translated it?"Can you show me that viz used that kanji?
I actually count 3-3, because tempest has declared he doesn’t care about the bullet point. And the viz thing was just supporting evidence anyway. The main point is that you can’t justify it being a real bullet, while I’ve given several pieces of evidence for it to not be realAh, missed them. But yeh, there are more disagreements than agreements, and half of it stems from Viz translations that are confirmed wrong.
Me not caring ≠ me agreeing or disagreeing. That's called neutral.I actually count 3-3, because tempest has declared he doesn’t care about the bullet point. And the viz thing was just supporting evidence anyway. The main point is that you can’t justify it being a real bullet, while I’ve given several pieces of evidence for it to not be real
Yeah that’s why I didn’t include you in the tally...Me not caring ≠ me agreeing or disagreeing. That's called neutral.
You had 2 points.
1 being a loop in creation feat logic which would affect half the wiki which I debunked.
1 being a mistranslation.
Disagree with the OP for my reasons.
The first point was a mistranslation backed by scaling that is founded on that mistranslation.The first point wasn’t a loop. It’s backed up by several pieces of evidence as to why it shouldn’t be real.
The second point was faulty supporting evidence that would shit on half the wiki.The 2nd point was just supporting evidence.
Now I have contentions with the bullet not being real, because the arguments for it is faulty.but the point of this thread was to disregard the maki feat, so if you don’t have any contentions with the bullet not being real, nobody else has adequately refuted it
The bullet isn't real because it's made out of cursed energy.Why exactly are we disregarding Maki's Feat?
No, the arguments arent faulty for it not being a real bullet. The arguments are that EVEN if she could create a real bullet, her limit is ONE per day, and we see her use rubber bullets on other students. She’s under orders to Kill yuji, so she would save the one for him, and use a rubber one on makiThe first point was a mistranslation backed by scaling that is founded on that mistranslation.
The second point was faulty supporting evidence that would shit on half the wiki.
Now I have contentions with the bullet not being real, because the arguments for it is faulty.
You know people can kill with rubber bullets correct?No, the arguments arent faulty for it not being a real bullet. The arguments are that EVEN if she could create a real bullet, her limit is ONE per day, and we see her use rubber bullets on other students. She’s under orders to Kill yuji, so she would save the one for him, and use a rubber one on maki
So??? They aren’t as fast as real bullets, and the rubber bullets fired at students didn’t kill them. Plus, she’d want to use the bullet with the highest Chance of succeeding on yuji, which would be a real oneYou know people can kill with rubber bullets correct?
Ok.So??? They aren’t as fast as real bullets, and the rubber bullets fired at students didn’t kill them. Plus, she’d want to use the bullet with the highest Chance of succeeding on yuji, which would be a real one
No... that doesn’t mean that, she could use cursed energy to create the rubber, and once again, that doesn’t defeat the argument of her not using it on makiOk.
The cursed energy bullet isn't a rubber bullet.
So this argument is moot.
Can you show me that?for reference the velocity of a rubber bullet fired from .357 Magnum would be Around 400 m/s.
they arent slow per se
She DID use her ability to fight Maki. Go read the fight, not only does she explain using her ability to the reader, but Maki even flat out says that Mai had used her six shots.No... that doesn’t mean that, she could use cursed energy to create the rubber, and once again, that doesn’t defeat the argument of her not using it on maki
That's faster than soundfor reference the velocity of a rubber bullet fired from .357 Magnum would be Around 400 m/s.
they arent slow per se
She DID use her ability to fight Maki. Go read the fight, not only does she explain using her ability to the reader, but Maki even flat out says that Mai had used her six shots.
I’m not seeing where y’all are getting this figure for rubber bullets m/sThat's faster than sound
Worst case scenario, multiply the result of Maki's feat by (400/445) to account for the bullet's speed
Mach 24
So you’re fine with downgrading to that extent? I just think there’s no basis for it being a real bulletI actually do agree that it's left vague if a real bullet is used, so I think that the Mach 24 calculation should be used here instead. In case I wasn't clear enough, I do absolutely disagree with a downgrade to Trans/Super sonic.
I’m not seeing where y’all are getting this figure for rubber bullets m/s
The lethal history of rubber bullets—and why they should never be used on peaceful protesters
Rubber bullets fired on protesters can kill. So why are we using them?www.fastcompany.com
Yeahalso refer to what therefir says here about rubber bullet speed
My Hero Academia: Ultimate Speed
vsbattles.fandom.com
And that's fine. I can see it being either way is the thing, but I am leaning slightly more towards the more conservative rubber bullet option.So you’re fine with downgrading to that extent? I just think there’s no basis for it being a real bullet
Wuke isn't arguing it isn't a bullet, they're arguing it isn't a typical bullet. A rubber bullet is what they're arguing.Omw to downgrade every celestial body feat if it involves energy
Wuke isn't arguing it isn't a bullet, they're arguing it isn't a typical bullet. A rubber bullet is what they're arguing.
If they are arguing it's made of energy, then that's just wrong, Maki's ability is expressly stated to be creation.
And this is perfectly consistent given that we know mai created the bullets with curses energy, without conformation of the bullets composition.
and since we already are in the shadows about the details of Mai’s construction technique, to keep the scaling consistent, it’s likely it’s not a real bullet, and so the Mach 27 feat should not be used to scale characters.
Yeah I’m just saying it’s not your standard roundWuke isn't arguing it isn't a bullet, they're arguing it isn't a typical bullet. A rubber bullet is what they're arguing.
If they are arguing it's made of energy, then that's just wrong, Maki's ability is expressly stated to be creation.
Downgrade because it’s not a real bullet, more likely rubberSound Speed Blood antifeats are moot because of mistranslations.
What else?
Especially given the context I think it’s safer to say it’s not a standard roundAnd that's fine. I can see it being either way is the thing, but I am leaning slightly more towards the more conservative rubber bullet option.
Downgrade to mach 24? I'll take it.Downgrade because it’s not a real bullet, more likely rubber
SureDowngrade to mach 24? I'll take it.
Downgrade to under sound speed, no
I apologize for the hostility, and I'm glad we've made a consensus.Sure
Talking about the current situation, there is an accepted recalculation of the feat. It would be used in a speed revison, but I have no problem applying it now