PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,073
- 5,993
- Thread starter
- #81
can you go ahead in time and grab the next Nintendo console from the future then since your 4D.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
can you go ahead in time and grab the next Nintendo console from the future then since your 4D.
Nintendo sucks
Yes you have some misconception and missed something, which is the fact that Mori used avatars, not that he himself is existing at all those places at once, he used the tablets to project his avatar/clone.
I should add though that yes something similar to this is enough for someone to become 4D but it is way more complicated than this.
Please read my previous posts on the matterHow would that not qualify though? It should still fulfill the dimensionality requirements. Yes he projected an avatar into the past, but the avatar was not the only thing that existed in the past. His physical body was still with Ahan & baby Taejin as well on geundoowun (his cloud) as well, at a different point in time, and location. That same Mori was also in Nirvana. Yes Mory can move through time, but time isn't the only thing he's moving through, he's also moving through dimensions.
Mori's true essence can't be contained in the lower dimension which is why the avatar serves as a medium. When a being from a higher dimension descends into a lower dimension, the beings native to the lower dimension can only perceive that cross section right? since they lack the axis to perceive the higher D being. In Abbots flatland when the sphere descended into the 2D plane, the square could only perceive the cross section of sphere (when it intersected the flat plane) and that cross section was essentially expanding and contracting as it moved up and down that plane. Square could not see all of sphere since his kind can't move in that direction. In Mori's case he doesn't descend, since his true body can't be contained or perceived by the lower dimension hence whe avatars can be used for interaction hence why Xuanzang said all ties were cut.
IIRC Satan flat out mistook Xuangzang's projected nirvana avatar from for Mori, and referred to it as higher dimensional being as well
Yeah with that explanation not enough for HDE. Change the explanation or remove HDEMori has HDE on his profile the reasons for that is
Higher-Dimensional Existence (4-D - Exists in a place where space and time overlap, and can oversee all of creation from this realm)
In case you are not caught up here you go, HDE is now in terms of maths alone. So unless it is in terms of maths Mori cannot have HDE which is the reason for this thereI am no HDE expert,
But this topic was not applied. lolIn case you are not caught up here you go, HDE is now in terms of maths alone. So unless it is in terms of maths Mori cannot have HDE which is the reason for this there
Can you please stop linking CRTs that aren't concluded? Thank you.In case you are not caught up here you go, HDE is now in terms of maths alone. So unless it is in terms of maths Mori cannot have HDE which is the reason for this there
Read the thread, that was the point, if the thread was applied then Mori can qualify but since the thread is rejected Mori cannot.But this topic was not applied. lol
Actually there are some agreements and the disagreements so far are due to ignorance of the current standards.So far I'm seeing a pretty universal disagreement with this CRT...
Maybe if you read the CRT you will know what it stands for, check up above.Can you please stop linking CRTs that aren't concluded? Thank you.
You've had this habit for a while now, where you dismiss anyone who disagrees with you as being wrong for doing so for one reason or another. Like, please just accept that people disagree with you.Actually there are some agreements and the disagreements so far are due to ignorance of the current standards.
The crt is not finished dummyIn case you are not caught up here you go, HDE is now in terms of maths alone. So unless it is in terms of maths Mori cannot have HDE which is the reason for this there
Like bro read the damn thread, I have had it with you, you mean the users who said my thread was trying to make HDE strict when it is the other way around?You've had this habit for a while now, where you dismiss anyone who disagrees with you as being wrong for doing so for one reason or another. Like, please just accept that people disagree with you.
it includes 2 admins and Firestorm thinks it is iffy which is why he thinks they need a better justification which I can count as an agree but I will wait for him to clarify his stance. Also Sir Ovens point was that Mori has R>F so he is HDE, when the standard explicitly says that R>F does not qualify, so again that is because he did not know that part and I explained to him and waiting on his reply.And this disagreement includes 2 or 3 admins (idk where Firestorm stands tbh) so you're gonna need something real convincing
I made the thread and I conceded on all my points already so I am sure it is.The crt is not finished dummy
Damn, why is the thread not closed if it is concluded?I made the thread and I conceded on all my points already so I am sure it is.
Dread not everything is about you and I really do not care what you assumed. Also to buttress my point about ignorance going around, when did having HDE over 3D become low 1-C since that was my OP in that thread, how you read that to mean I am restricting it to low 1-C is beyond me. Also R>F being mathematical shows that you did not read DT's points in that thread at all.No, Pain, I did not assume that you wanted to strict HDE (in matter of facts, the 3 requirements you had in CRT was a little bit strict, because you were literally limiting to low 1-C beings and above), but your derailment with "it is mathematical, no it should be math, pray math!" is annoying because in matter of fact, the context here is pretty much mathematical, and the justification itself is also mathematical in my view.
Which rules says a thread needs to be closed when it is concluded?Damn, why is the thread not closed if it is concluded?
You should read things three times before replying, it is really getting annoying that you keep on misrepresenting my arguments none of my requirements would have restricted it to higher tiers, HDE is meant for 4D and above to begin with and my point was that it is not only through maths and physics someone can be HDE there are other methods, but that must have eluded you as usual since you do not read anything I send.You pretty much were stricting it to higher tiers with those requirements, this is the main reasons why DT rejected them.
No rule says thisAlso, if the thread is concluded by everyone and staff members, it should simply be closed.
I am the OP I conceded so again it is done, now it is just me asking DT on some clarifications about HDE.But in matter of fact, it is not concluded.
This buffoonery at its finest, so let me get this straight you are interpreting my statement to mean something I said it does not mean and your stance is true?I am not misrepresenting anything. The requirements were pretty much the same as you how you get higher tiers. Now, again, tell me I need to read for 4th time and I will still see in this way, because pretty much when I asked for source of this requirements before you created the CRT, you told me this.
There is qualitative superiority over dimensionality though even right now at the wiki, I bet you did not even know that. What we do not allow is that HDE meaning higher tier, physically? sure but AP? not so muchbecause if your requirements are passed, anyone with HDE will get a higher tier with a good argument that there is qualitative supriority over dimensionality.
Yeah you are not going to interpret my stance for me, since that is a dumb thing to do.Anyway, I have give my stance above.
thats not new, also yes this is my whole point, I won' allow your requirements to be implimeneted SINCE it mostly/kinda forced to have some specific tiers.There is qualitative superiority over dimensionality though even right now at the wiki, I bet you did not even know that. What we do not allow is that HDE meaning higher tier, physically? sure but AP? not so much
You are amusing to watch, you mean the requirements you agreed on in the thread? I guess you did not form a thought of your own and joined the bandwagonI won' allow your requirements to be implimeneted SINCE it mostly/kinda forced to have some specific tiers.
Animal man (DC), it is not "I cannot imagine" but "I do not know" since obviously it is because you did not know, also there are many more examples.I can't imagine a single HDE user with those requirements and does not have a higher tier (for example 9B with HDE without requirements)
Its really abritary.
I agreed on them before DT's input, which makes my input invalid if the current argument I agreed on, was fairly debunked.You are amusing to watch, you mean the requirements you agreed on in the thread? I guess you did not form a thought of your own and joined the bandwagon
ClarifyAnimal man (DC), it is not "I cannot imagine" but "I do not know" since obviously it is because you did not know, also there are many more examples.
Sure lets wait, and if he did not comment, surely the thread can go foward with current staff members evaulation.Also DT has seen this, check the thread, he said that is not HDE, I will tell him to comment here officially though
One person is not the be-all end-all, especially when you've got 2 admins disagreeing with you. You know that right?Like bro read the damn thread, I have had it with you, you mean the users who said my thread was trying to make HDE strict when it is the other way around?
Most of their arguments hinges on R>F and Transcendence and if you read my OP or DT's reply you will see based on our standards that is not HDE, it is simple and cut and most of them did not know that and they are arguing for it, I even had to ask DT again, and he said Mori does not qualify and he does not even qualify for tier 2 but I do not care about that.
So if you are going to speak ignorantly, refrain from tagging me to your nonsense.
Really? Now you're just cherrypicking which agreements and disagreements you consider to actually matter and what you arbitrarily deem to be an agreement/disagreement, which is a pretty dishonest/underhanded move.it includes 2 admins and Firestorm thinks it is iffy which is why he thinks they need a better justification which I can count as an agree but I will wait for him to clarify his stance. Also Sir Ovens point was that Mori has R>F so he is HDE, when the standard explicitly says that R>F does not qualify, so again that is because he did not know that part and I explained to him and waiting on his reply.
Every thread it's the same passive aggressive responses, I feel like I've read the same conversation between them 100 times :-:@PrinceofPein @ImmortalDread
You two need to be banned from interacting with one another frfr
I swear it’s every thread I see them in they duking it out
Unless you are more knowledgeable than DT in the matters of HDE, which you are not. I think I will go with DT's statement on Mori's which is and I quote "Is also so vague that I don't think it would qualify for even evidence of being Tier 2"Mori existing in a realm beyond all creation, such that he can oversee all of it from this domain (especially when it's stated to be a plane where space and time overlap, which helps further as space-time is the 4th dimension) makes for a blatant case of Higher Dimensional Existence
I am not doing that, Fire storm said "While I agree that the reasoning needs to be revised, I don't know if there is a replacement reasoning in the series." this means he does not think there is another reasoning in the series, which is what I meant by he finds it iffy and I can count it as an agree but I will wait for him to clarify his stance, how is that dishonest? You are reaching at this point.Really? Now you're just cherrypicking which agreements and disagreements you consider to actually matter, which is a pretty dishonest/underhanded move
ThisAlso, bring DT in this thread