- 167
- 37
Eos Eve sure(even Kirkman sees it that way). Oliver, Robot and Tech Jacket also should by the way, I don't know why the site treats them like they don'tShould scale to viltrumites honestly
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Eos Eve sure(even Kirkman sees it that way). Oliver, Robot and Tech Jacket also should by the way, I don't know why the site treats them like they don'tShould scale to viltrumites honestly
I've roughly calced it before but haven't published for VSBW. Gets to around moon-small planet IIRC.Has this feat been calculated yet ?
Funnily enough, I did a calc on the solar disk all the way back in like 2021 or 2022 and uploaded it on my Invincible doc. I was preaching that feat for a while as supplementary evidence to help Viltrum feat look more consistent. Surprised DB found it only recently. Got to Small Planet btw.You'd think a series as popular as this would be more thoroughly analized but apparently not
We should ask the guy who did the Viltrum calculation that's currently used, he wanted to use another planet as a reference but got told off about it, it seems he was onto something after all. He's also got a lifting strength feat for Tech Jacket that hasn't been revised yet
Maybe pre-s4. Having 2 specials for this season would blow over their $50 animation budget unfortunately.Hoping we get an Omni-Man special episode with a flashback to his world conquering days (after the Rex Splode special obviously)
What about trying to get an estimate about Viltrum's size ?Funnily enough, I did a calc on the solar disk all the way back in like 2021 or 2022 and uploaded it on my Invincible doc. I was preaching that feat for a while as supplementary evidence to help Viltrum feat look more consistent. Surprised DB found it only recently. Got to Small Planet btw.
the planet was already destabilized, but the best it can do to Viltrum is destabilize it
Agree to disagree. It’s not really a case of proving a negative either way, but I’ve shown my reason. Conquest would have no reason to think “that’s not how that works” in regards to rage and strength. Same with the name-less Viltrumite thinking rage gives Omni-Man no advantage in combat, but rather only a disadvantage.Yeah, I still have to disagree with the assurtion that Viltrumites don't have adrenaline. At no point do any of them (characters or Kirkman) say Viltrumites lack adrenal glans. Kirkman was reaffirming that Mark had the willpower to win, and that his adrenaline allowed him to push further. "[Y]ou had rage and adrenaline... you were more invested in the fight." isn't "you had adrenaline... which is why you won the fight". Mark was so invested that he had that over Conquest. Conquest died without believing he would die, that it this was anything more than a game that he was a "spectator" of.
It’s just there as a side-note. Best to include everything in there.Is the Mean Supreme scaling supposed to really mean anything. I get that the aim is to point out that Invincible (as a verse) is stronger than it may seem at first, but such scaling is wildly beyond everything in verse.
At the exact point t=0 where he exits the ship and they’re in the same position, he’d need to provide his own acceleration to get ahead of it. At t=0 they become 2 separate “particles”. Inertial frames ykQuestion, wouldn't Mark already be moving at MTFL speeds when he outraces the CoP ship?
I generally thought most of DB’s methods were horseshit. I don’t take them seriously. They use a lot of Occam’s razor for calcs and I disagree with their methods.What about trying to get an estimate about Viltrum's size ?
Also, do Death Battle methods change anything about the stuff you've calculated ?
I also feel like there's a decent argument for them being way above the current value they scale to. Space Racer's gun can statedly (and shown in the animated series) to destroy stars and planets, but the best it can do to Viltrum is destabilize it ? And not even permanently as it was going to restabilize almost instantly
The planet was destabilised due to the infinity ray. I’m not sure where you got it being destabilised prior from.the planet was already destabilized
Must've gotten confused my apologiesThe planet was destabilised due to the infinity ray. I’m not sure where you got it being destabilised prior from.
What methods are even consistent for the sun disk calcI generally thought most of DB’s methods were horseshit. I don’t take them seriously. They use a lot of Occam’s razor for calcs and I disagree with their methods.
I’ve thought about that with the infinity ray before and just dismissed it. It’s too illogical narratively and creates a whole load of issues. I’d rather just keep the show and comic separate for now. I’d like to think comic versions relies on more chain-reaction type events to reach high destruction, like how it did the asteroid field. How it does that for Stars? Can’t explain that, but the description for the ray in the comic was left fairly ambiguous anyhow.
Aren't you also aplying that to yours tho ?They use a lot of Occam’s razor for calcs
The chain reaction was the ray hitting the asteriod so hard it's pieces hit other asteriods and so on, that isn't what happened on Viltrum at all. It's not like it affected the ring's gravity, making the asteroids easier to destroyI’d like to think comic versions relies on more chain-reaction type events to reach high destruction, like how it did the asteroid field.
I’d just go over the lowest end of assumptions. Not inflate. I used geometry for the size of the disk (pixel calcing the perspective where the laser hits it) from the planet via assuming the planet is Earth-sized and knowing 100% of light is obscured (also assuming AU distances from the planet to the Star).Must've gotten confused my apologies
What methods are even consistent for the sun disk calc
In what way? For the Viltrum calc I did there’s a lot more simpler ways to go about it that’d yield higher values. I tried to go the niche way of specific mass of the planet ejected at escape velocity. If I knew how to, I’d probably try factor in how escape velocity changes in small increments after more and more mass leaves the planetary body. It’s probably negligible though. DB pretty much assume the Viltrumite’s did all the work for the feat IIRC.Aren't you also aplying that to yours tho ?
If the ray was star level in DC wouldn’t it completely obliterate the single asteroid it hit, instead of sending it off omni-directionally into large enough chunks to cause a chain reaction. Calcs would also just go out the window if we assume Viltrum’s core is star+ level durability. It’s a dumb rhetoric imoThe chain reaction was the ray hitting the asteriod so hard it's pieces hit other asteriods and so on, that isn't what happened on Viltrum at all. It's not like it affected the ring's gravity, making the asteroids easier to destroy
Why wouldn't it be true ? Also iirc that was talked about here but was dismissed because it was higher than Viltrum destruction(which they got through botched methods anyway)Do we take Nolan claim of stopping a asteroid the size of texas has true?
You're mentioning in the end of the blog the writting of the Invincible-verse functions that wayIn what way?
Where it was talked about anyway?also do you mean tte destruction of the planet of those aliens?Nolan didn't seem to go all out in that fight, if he did the whole civilization would be dead and he needed them alive so he could go backWhy wouldn't it be true ? Also iirc that was talked about here but was dismissed because it was higher than Viltrum destruction(which they got through botched methods anyway)
Where it was talked about anyway?
This aged badly after Omni man travels through entire galaxies and they put him at RelativisticOmniman (TV) potential upgrade?
So Mark threw a meteor back to space and Omni man says he did the same with a meteor the size of Texas. Pretty sure that would garner some serious AP, any thoughts?vsbattles.com
Even worse in FSLIt's been an hour since the Season 3 trailer dropped and this thread is as dead as before, the verse is cooked in this site
When are we gonna use the throwing the asteroid feat?Nice, the trailer starts with stats.
Invincible: 163% Speed, 170% Endurance, and 238% Strength
If Mark growing 238% stronger in 3 months is seen as impressive growth, then it makes less sense to have his first key at 7-A considering there shouldn't be that much difference between the Mark that fought the Viltrumites and the Mark at the beginning of the series.Nice, the trailer starts with stats.
Invincible: 163% Speed, 170% Endurance, and 238% Strength
Yeah, I really think a big part of things is him not being used to his strength yet.If Mark growing 238% stronger in 3 months is seen as impressive growth, then it makes less sense to have his first key at 7-A considering there shouldn't be that much difference between the Mark that fought the Viltrumites and the Mark at the beginning of the series.
Mark could barely make Nolan flinch in S1, it is too inconsistent for him to be viltrumite level so early.If Mark growing 238% stronger in 3 months is seen as impressive growth, then it makes less sense to have his first key at 7-A considering there shouldn't be that much difference between the Mark that fought the Viltrumites and the Mark at the beginning of the series.
I was just regurgitating what Donald said by adding it to 100% for each statistic, because that's the level Mark has attained, not how much he has grown on top of 100%.If Mark growing 238% stronger in 3 months is seen as impressive growth, then it makes less sense to have his first key at 7-A considering there shouldn't be that much difference between the Mark that fought the Viltrumites and the Mark at the beginning of the series.
I don't know why his keys aren't just labeled "Season 1 | Season 2"Mark could barely make Nolan flinch in S1, it is too inconsistent for him to be viltrumite level so early.
+65% SpeedNice, the trailer starts with stats.
Invincible: 163% Speed, 170% Endurance, and 238% Strength
Second option, he's gonna bust, all right.He better bust a planet or bust.
It’s seen more impressive cuz he’s already been developing a while. That’s how I see it at least. Like I’d imagine they’d see completely BoS Mark increasing in stats like 10-fold or whatever in quick succession as nothing too crazy because the level he’s increasing to isn’t crazy itself. I’m sure the level he’s at and increasing from is getting impressive within itself.If Mark growing 238% stronger in 3 months is seen as impressive growth, then it makes less sense to have his first key at 7-A considering there shouldn't be that much difference between the Mark that fought the Viltrumites and the Mark at the beginning of the series.
That’s nothing to do with feats. It’s about the contents of the handbook for biology and power explanations or whatever.You're mentioning in the end of the blog the writting of the Invincible-verse functions that way
Anyway, have you ever thought of revisiting them one last time before posting them here ? If not, would it be ok for someone else to post them while crediting you, after you've checked them ?
Maybe those explosions from the trailer possibly? Probably not though. If we’re lucky, the same nuke Mark flies into and seems to set off would be the same one presumably strong enough to set off the biggest solar in the Sun. Might not be Multi-Continental in size as a nuclear explosion but would be in AP.+65% Speed
+70% Endurance
+138% Strength
His AP would be 2.45 Teratons. Neat, I guess.
Don't know if we'll be seeing any visual feats at that level this season.