- 167,823
- 76,436
@GyroNutz @Mr._Bambu @Andytrenom @DarkDragonMedeus @Abstractions
Would you be willing to perform some evaluations here please?
Would you be willing to perform some evaluations here please?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did I ever get staff input regarding the following suggested change btw?We preferably need to adjust the following text accordingly as well.
"There is no way to reliably quantify intelligence, and even these rankings are just suggestions and guidelines for pages. It is more important that a page discusses a character's intelligence and gives feats for their varying skills than have a solid ranking, although it may help with quickly summarizing their overall intellects and how they measure up to others."
Would something like this be a better alternative?
"There is no way to reliably quantify intelligence, and even the following rankings are just guidelines. It is more important that a page describes a character's most impressive intelligence feats along with their various skills than that it defines a solid ranking, although it helps with quickly summarising their overall intellect and how it compares to others."
I think that this evaluation makes sense. It is probably unnecessary. Our Intelligence page seems mostly fine as it is currently.One question: If 'Mindless' in this case is not an intelligence ranking but simply a consequence of one's physiology/being, then do we need the examples? Those are mainly for clarifications in intelligence rankings - a character may be a genius in a specific area but have average intelligence otherwise. However a character having artificial intelligence/being possessed are just unconventional means of having intelligent thought and don't relate to the intelligence rankings themselves.
Basically - does this need to be clarified? Would the mindless note not be enough?
Personally I would keep it at Suggested Rankings. While the standards are in more common usage now, the inherent problem with a fixed intelligence scale remains.