This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
One question: If 'Mindless' in this case is not an intelligence ranking but simply a consequence of one's physiology/being, then do we need the examples? Those are mainly for clarifications in intelligence rankings - a character may be a genius in a specific area but have average intelligence otherwise. However a character having artificial intelligence/being possessed are just unconventional means of having intelligent thought and don't relate to the intelligence rankings themselves.
Basically - does this need to be clarified? Would the mindless note not be enough?
We preferably need to adjust the following text accordingly as well.
"There is no way to reliably quantify intelligence, and even these rankings are just suggestions and guidelines for pages. It is more important that a page discusses a character's intelligence and gives feats for their varying skills than have a solid ranking, although it may help with quickly summarizing their overall intellects and how they measure up to others."
Would something like this be a better alternative?
"There is no way to reliably quantify intelligence, and even the following rankings are just guidelines. It is more important that a page describes a character's most impressive intelligence feats along with their various skills than that it defines a solid ranking, although it helps with quickly summarising their overall intellect and how it compares to others."
One question: If 'Mindless' in this case is not an intelligence ranking but simply a consequence of one's physiology/being, then do we need the examples? Those are mainly for clarifications in intelligence rankings - a character may be a genius in a specific area but have average intelligence otherwise. However a character having artificial intelligence/being possessed are just unconventional means of having intelligent thought and don't relate to the intelligence rankings themselves.
Basically - does this need to be clarified? Would the mindless note not be enough?
Personally I would keep it at Suggested Rankings. While the standards are in more common usage now, the inherent problem with a fixed intelligence scale remains.