Based on the information provided, it appears that the notability criteria for the verse in question has been met, and that it has a sufficient number of active readers. It has been brought to my attention that this information has been previously shared, however, I understand that I am currently unable to provide the relevant details, as I time is limited, and I will be going offline for the next week.
I will give this responsibility to others.
At this time, the only information that I can provide to support my position is the work that I have presented in the original post (
the cosmology, verse page, and physiology page).
I mean, the same argument can be used on the reddit verses that got scaled and added here. Or even Manwhas that are not necessarily famous but rather not high in tiers.
I would like to pose a serious inquiry to the community and y'all:
- Is the rejection or dismissal of the verse in question rooted in the perception that it is excessively powerful or high in terms of tiering and abilities?
- Or, is it a result of negative sentiments towards the author's personal characteristics?
- Alternatively, is it due to the belief that the novel is of poor quality and not worthy of consideration?
- Or, is it because the author does not possess a doctorate degree or official author status?
It is important to consider these factors and be honest and transparent with ourselves, in order to ensure that any decisions or evaluations are made objectively, and not influenced by personal biases or prejudices.
I am being honest here, I never ever
thought of adding it after
Sir Oven said, as long as there is no direct involvement with any members, then it is fine.
@Immortalgodd, I apologize if my previous statement was perceived as an accusation, that was not my intention. However, I would like to point out that the argument being presented lacks substantial evidence throughout the current thread of discussion. The author's awareness of the powerscaling aspect is not germane to the topic at hand. It is my understanding that the VsBattle Wiki (VSBW) community is well-known and respected, and it would not be reasonable to remove a significant portion of the verses without proper justification. Additionally, I would like to acknowledge that you have stated that views in China can be manipulated, and that this is an obvious fact, and therefore, no evidence is required to support this assertion.
Also, don't derail and send the rules that back up your refutation that is based on the rules, I added mines in my OP thread.