- 9,267
- 4,372
No they still use it, so long as it meets the criteria for it, which is why I said "not inherently".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No they still use it, so long as it meets the criteria for it, which is why I said "not inherently".
A spatial dimension that has transcendence is still a spatial dimension, which we use it.
The word "I" implies state of being, and so do the terms "power" and "level". A state of being automatically implies that you are dimensioned in nature.'well you see there are dimensions in my world that transcend each other in a Tier 1 way, but I am beyond the concept and so no matter how many transcendence a dimensioned being will never reach my level of power'
does that owkr
Your post makes no sense. Therefore it is invalidThe word "I" implies state of being, and so do the terms "power" and "level". A state of being automatically implies that you are dimensioned in nature.
Now I'm not saying that 1-A and above doesn't exist. I'm saying that it's only applicable to hierarchies and mathematics
..... Spatial dimention still can be higher tiers if is tracendental, but at that point literally everything can be tier 2-1 if they are tracendentalI said that they still use spatial dimensions under certain conditions. It having a transcendent nature doesn't suddenly disprove them of being a spatial dimension if the verse says it is one.
I’m pretty sure it’s the exact opposite as of recent. Vs battles doesn’t use claims of characters being “dimensionless” as accurate scaling of said characters, and it wouldn’t make sense even if that weren’t the case. It literally isn’t tier-able without further in verse contextbut I believe we ignore that reasoning for the purposes of VS Debating.
there’s a difference between illogical things happening in fiction and logical contradictions.It's the same reason why we can ignore conservation of mass when referring to AP, or how we allow match-ups with characters who posses Type 5 Acausality or Type 2 NEP despite them not being logically able to interact/be interacted with: because fiction tends to ignore that logic.
By what standards is it illogical? Yours? We don't care about that.saying that a space is “dimensionless” is a logical contradiction. Saying that a being “exists” that is dimensionless is also a logical contradiction.
transcending means a lot of things. use a different adjective to elaborate your points because transcending the multiverse is no longer enough for tier 1 nor does it explain what you are trying to say by saying transcendentalWe don´t use them for Higher tiers, if they are the reasons they are the higher tier is because they are tracendental (wich is the exception not the rule here), wich only a few spatial dimensions actually give tiers
They qualify if they tracend in a inmensurable infintetranscending means a lot of things. use a different adjective to elaborate your points because transcending the multiverse is no longer enough for tier 1 nor does it explain what you are trying to say by saying transcendental
We literally have a FAQ of the tiering question to explain how higher spatial dimension can qualify and why being 4 spatial dimension doesn't grant tiers anymore but still considered higher dimensional (HDE in P&A) unless they are also stated to be capable of embedding the entire universe into them which by then they would be low 2-C or higher
And those dimensions aren´t spatial1-A: Outerverse level
Characters who can affect objects with a number of dimensions equal to the cardinal aleph-2
Why do you think that?And those dimensions aren´t spatial
They alredy tackled that in the Tiering revision reworkWhy do you think that?
idc just tell meThey alredy tackled that in the Tiering revision rework
Dimensions (spatials) are no longer used for tiering, because it was just range feats and not actually AP featsidc just tell me
that doesn't disprove anything lmaoDimensions (spatials) are no longer used for tiering, because it was just range feats and not actually AP feats
.... what? i alredy tell that dimensions are about legth not AP. Basically just being really bigthat doesn't disprove anything lmao
It does practically scales the character somewhere under correct circumstances.We use math or more specifically alephs or inaccessible cardinal as a quantification for the certain amount of dimensions. The math itself doesn't really scale anywhere.
Aaaand they might be upgraded again depending on the Type IV multiverse CRT.
it doesn't seem likely tbh
thanks btw
.... what? i alredy tell that dimensions are about legth not AP. Basically just being really big
why can't we have a aleph-2 sized 3 dimensional space?It does practically scales the character somewhere under correct circumstances.
For an illustration, if certain character destroys an object with aleph-2 sized, he’d presumably be 1-A due to him destroying an object’s scale that completely exceeds fundamental structure of geometric space, as the R is composed of the set of every real numbers, or simply aleph-1 in size.
What does R meanBecause any aleph-2-sized object would already possess a number of points greater than R.
Alright well I'll ask again. Why can't I have a uncountably infinite 3 dimensional spaceDimensions are defined as powers of R (real numbers) in coordinate space
R^0 = a point (0-D)
R^1 = a line (1-D)
R^2 = a plane (2-D)
R^N = High 1-B
R^R = Low 1-A
It does bruh. I'm using the same logic with Aleph-1, if your saying a 3d space could by uncountably infinite in size then it's the size of Aleph-1 meaning it wouldn't automatically qualify for the tier Low-OuterA 3-D space is already uncountable infinite in comparison to 2-D. Them being aleph-2 sized would be another matter that doesn't correlate with your question.
Like I said, even the smallest possible unit powered by Aleph-2 would already be beyond R spaces.It does bruh. I'm using the same logic with Aleph-1, if your saying a 3d space could by uncountably infinite in size then it's the size of Aleph-1 meaning it wouldn't automatically qualify for the tier Low-Outer
Don't think I fully understand. You got any sources to learn more about Real Coordinate Spaces?Like I said, even the smallest possible unit powered by Aleph-2 would already be beyond R spaces.
11-C to Low 1-A are all defined by varying degrees of powers of R or Aleph-1. So an aleph-2-sized thing would already be beyond those.