• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

How are the Downstreamers Boundless?

you said that they used it, i pointed they don´t use spatial stuff for tiering anymore. So what was your point then
 
I said that they still use spatial dimensions under certain conditions. It having a transcendent nature doesn't suddenly disprove them of being a spatial dimension if the verse says it is one.
 
'well you see there are dimensions in my world that transcend each other in a Tier 1 way, but I am beyond the concept and so no matter how many transcendence a dimensioned being will never reach my level of power'

does that owkr
The word "I" implies state of being, and so do the terms "power" and "level". A state of being automatically implies that you are dimensioned in nature.

Now I'm not saying that 1-A and above doesn't exist. I'm saying that it's only applicable to hierarchies and mathematics
 
The word "I" implies state of being, and so do the terms "power" and "level". A state of being automatically implies that you are dimensioned in nature.

Now I'm not saying that 1-A and above doesn't exist. I'm saying that it's only applicable to hierarchies and mathematics
Your post makes no sense. Therefore it is invalid
 
I can somewhat understand the argument behind a physical state of being implying dimensionality, but I believe we ignore that reasoning for the purposes of VS Debating. It's the same reason why we can ignore conservation of mass when referring to AP, or how we allow match-ups with characters who posses Type 5 Acausality or Type 2 NEP despite them not being logically able to interact/be interacted with: because fiction tends to ignore that logic.
 
I said that they still use spatial dimensions under certain conditions. It having a transcendent nature doesn't suddenly disprove them of being a spatial dimension if the verse says it is one.
..... Spatial dimention still can be higher tiers if is tracendental, but at that point literally everything can be tier 2-1 if they are tracendental
 
By all mean, spatial or temporal or whatever it is, they are still dimension. If it fit the criteria for higher tier then it is higher tier.
 
We don´t use them for Higher tiers, if they are the reasons they are the higher tier is because they are tracendental (wich is the exception not the rule here), wich only a few spatial dimensions actually give tiers
 
but I believe we ignore that reasoning for the purposes of VS Debating.
I’m pretty sure it’s the exact opposite as of recent. Vs battles doesn’t use claims of characters being “dimensionless” as accurate scaling of said characters, and it wouldn’t make sense even if that weren’t the case. It literally isn’t tier-able without further in verse context
It's the same reason why we can ignore conservation of mass when referring to AP, or how we allow match-ups with characters who posses Type 5 Acausality or Type 2 NEP despite them not being logically able to interact/be interacted with: because fiction tends to ignore that logic.
there’s a difference between illogical things happening in fiction and logical contradictions.

saying that a space is “dimensionless” is a logical contradiction. Saying that a being “exists” that is dimensionless is also a logical contradiction.
 
We don´t use them for Higher tiers, if they are the reasons they are the higher tier is because they are tracendental (wich is the exception not the rule here), wich only a few spatial dimensions actually give tiers
transcending means a lot of things. use a different adjective to elaborate your points because transcending the multiverse is no longer enough for tier 1 nor does it explain what you are trying to say by saying transcendental

We literally have a FAQ of the tiering question to explain how higher spatial dimension can qualify and why being 4 spatial dimension doesn't grant tiers anymore but still considered higher dimensional (HDE in P&A) unless they are also stated to be capable of embedding the entire universe into them which by then they would be low 2-C or higher
 
transcending means a lot of things. use a different adjective to elaborate your points because transcending the multiverse is no longer enough for tier 1 nor does it explain what you are trying to say by saying transcendental

We literally have a FAQ of the tiering question to explain how higher spatial dimension can qualify and why being 4 spatial dimension doesn't grant tiers anymore but still considered higher dimensional (HDE in P&A) unless they are also stated to be capable of embedding the entire universe into them which by then they would be low 2-C or higher
They qualify if they tracend in a inmensurable infinte
 
We use math or more specifically alephs or inaccessible cardinal as a quantification for the certain amount of dimensions. The math itself doesn't really scale anywhere.
It does practically scales the character somewhere under correct circumstances.

For an illustration, if certain character destroys an object with aleph-2 sized, he’d presumably be 1-A due to him destroying an object’s scale that completely exceeds fundamental structure of geometric space, as the R is composed of the set of every real numbers, or simply aleph-1 in size.
 
.... what? i alredy tell that dimensions are about legth not AP. Basically just being really big

It does practically scales the character somewhere under correct circumstances.

For an illustration, if certain character destroys an object with aleph-2 sized, he’d presumably be 1-A due to him destroying an object’s scale that completely exceeds fundamental structure of geometric space, as the R is composed of the set of every real numbers, or simply aleph-1 in size.
why can't we have a aleph-2 sized 3 dimensional space?
 
Dimensions are defined as powers of R (real numbers) in coordinate space

R^0 = a point (0-D)
R^1 = a line (1-D)
R^2 = a plane (2-D)
R^N = High 1-B
R^R = Low 1-A
 
A 3-D space is already uncountable infinite in comparison to 2-D. Them being aleph-2 sized would be another matter that doesn't correlate with your question.
 
In the same way the smallest possible unit (points) powered by R are beyond Aleph-0, the smallest possible units powered by Aleph-2 exceeds R (Aleph-1) coordinate spaces, which is where dimensions are defined. Thus 1-A.
 
A 3-D space is already uncountable infinite in comparison to 2-D. Them being aleph-2 sized would be another matter that doesn't correlate with your question.
It does bruh. I'm using the same logic with Aleph-1, if your saying a 3d space could by uncountably infinite in size then it's the size of Aleph-1 meaning it wouldn't automatically qualify for the tier Low-Outer
 
It does bruh. I'm using the same logic with Aleph-1, if your saying a 3d space could by uncountably infinite in size then it's the size of Aleph-1 meaning it wouldn't automatically qualify for the tier Low-Outer
Like I said, even the smallest possible unit powered by Aleph-2 would already be beyond R spaces.

11-C to Low 1-A are all defined by varying degrees of powers of R or Aleph-1. So an aleph-2-sized thing would already be beyond those.
 
Like I said, even the smallest possible unit powered by Aleph-2 would already be beyond R spaces.

11-C to Low 1-A are all defined by varying degrees of powers of R or Aleph-1. So an aleph-2-sized thing would already be beyond those.
Don't think I fully understand. You got any sources to learn more about Real Coordinate Spaces?
 
Back
Top