How? For GL, I've seen just only mentioned about membranes, 10-11 dimensions space and nothing more left toward the significantly notion of layered higher dimension, not even higher plane of existence so, I see no difference here, and If we use the same standard of this site, I think it works.
I think you got no point about Hilbert space, Infinite lines(axes of dimension) perpendicular each other and made an infinite set of dimensions, not just infinite length of line.
So could you just ignoring the part of statement about difference between lower and higher dimension? Being said higher dimension treat the lower as but fiction means nothing here? In addition, If you really have a look, It has been said that its dimensional model also implicated with geometric concepts such Riemann manifold, Euclidean space and even Hilbert space(Said many times).
Lord Genome was rather direct and explicit with it. He calls it explicitly 10D and 11D brane layers. None of your stuff has the same level of directness, whic is why I'm not seeing them topping Low 1-C.
Your Hilbert quote doesn't mention his dimensions nor allude to them being what the franchise operates under. As for the lines, that's all I'm seeing. The axis are infinite in their respective dimension, not that there's an infinite amount of them.
That statement is why I'm fine with a Low 1-C rating.
The first two aren't evidence in of themselves for High 1-C, they are just solid supporting pieces of evidence to prove the dimensions are AP applicable. The issue is your 4 Dimenions + 7 String Dimensions quote. This means they're operating on string dimensions, which aren't applicable on this site anymore for Tier 1 ratings.
Nah, That moments, they are in the during of explanation about how those dimensions works, and also notified about manifold and Euclidean space concept for addition in that time, How those aren't applicable for AP then since they're talking in the same topic?
Yup, Hilbert space here is indeed mathematical concept as they are talking about geometry.
Low 1-C is for those that portray about 1 layered dimensional plane, But here are regard as more than that as I've told before.
"Dimensions of space can be infinite" How does it not mention about Hilbert dimension?, Lines here are regarding as the axes of dimensions, and all of them perpendicular each other thus form infinite sets of dimension, That's why he said "Dimensions of space can be infinite".
I see no that much of more directness, GL told us that there are "an imaginary oscillating space-time that located between membranes", So yeah, Honkai also have membranes thing too, and a term of imaginary space-time has been used several times, "of the dimensional universe we call 10th and 11th dimensions", and this too, "Related to quantum universe theory", Quantum thingy are a big deal in Honkai verse, whether quantization, quantum fluctuation of the world bubbles or even Schrodinger's cat. From all of this, I can speak fully that there are no that much of directness difference.
Because neither of those things have a set dimensional hierarchy. They are just mathematics to explain how a dimension would function in certain ways. It's why they are only supporting evidence, since they rely on a direct dimensional number to get anywhere.
What you posted doesn't suggest that they operate under that system, just that Hilbert's theories are canon in-universe. Hilbert Space also isn't automatically High 1-B, since it can be any finite or infinite number, what it does is just allow a higher rating to be achieved easier. Though for fairness I will say a lot of franchises with confirmed Hilbert spaces are rated at High 1-B in sole capacity, but I'm not really seeing it here.
Low 1-C is 5-6D, which is what your current evidence leads me to believe for the "God" in this case.
Because I'm not seeing them talking about dimensions in terms of higher dimensional number, but physical length.
That's not a dimension. Those are coordinate points
The big and important difference is that GL gives a number. Your stuff does not and the number it does give only suggests a 2-A multiverse.
You are blatantly downplaying it,they literally asked "Do you know how many lines can be perpendicular to each other in space?" In the previous scan
I'm just not seeing it supporting High 1-B rather than just infinite directional length.
My issue is that I don't know if those 11-Dimensions are usable for a AP rating. Like the manifolds are solid but they are also only applied to the world bubbles which are 2-A AP wise, and being part of a larger space would be Low 1-C rather than High 1-C.
But the manifold was only applied to the lower 4-Dimensional space, not the entire cosmology.
Which, as before, is where I said the Low 1-C thing comes from. From being dimensionally superior to them.
I'm not understanding what you're saying here. Are you trying to say that the 11 dimensions are only ever mentioned within the context of a single world bubble? Because that is blatantly false. The third scan outright states that the Quantum Sea is an 11-dimensional structure, and that the world bubbles make their own choices in inheriting these dimensions, which also brings us back to the first scan where the universe being talked about consists of 4 dimensions infinitely extending and 7 dimensions finitely curled up. As I said before, this is very much like how Max Tegmark thought that a type II multiverse would work: an infinitely expanding, high-dimensional space (the Quantum Sea) wherein some regions congeal into subspaces with some smaller number of dimensions (the world bubbles).
Again, I'm not seeing how that's Low 1-C on its own. Couldn't the guy in that scan just as easily be 4-D and still be superior by virtue of his higher-dimensional nature?
I don't agree with High 1-B either, so at least we see eye-to-eye there. But yes, we should let the people decide - gotta uphold the democracy of VS Battles.
