Rakih_Elyan
He/Him- 4,535
- 3,140
I didn't see the thing that said: "Every action within every moment within this space-time caused split into an infinite timeline."
Or anything resembling my scans before.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I didn't see the thing that said: "Every action within every moment within this space-time caused split into an infinite timeline."
And that proves that? Literally the events of Rias in Wonderland appear in the main novels lolNo, it's a What-If.
Edit: lol.
Define clearly? You just state and do not show scanWhat to say? Nothing. The OP is clear.
You are showing a scan that demonstrates that LoL, it literally shows that for each action there would be a timeline with a different action, for example the Chichigami thing.I didn't see the thing that said: "Every action within every moment within this space-time caused split into an infinite timeline."
Or anything resembling my scans before.
It just shows that these specific actions caused specific timelines. Nothing implies "Every action within every moment within this space-time caused split into an infinite timeline." nor the universal mechanics like in my Xianxia scans.You are showing a scan that demonstrates that LoL, it literally shows that for each action there would be a timeline with a different action, for example the Chichigami thing.
Lolol.And that proves that? Literally the events of Rias in Wonderland appear in the main novels lol
I don't state. I use scans.Define clearly? You just state and do not show scan
You know DxD isn't specifically based on just time branching lol, the possibilities are not only limited to time branching we literally have the existence of ExE and FxF and moreIt just shows that these specific actions caused specific timelines. Nothing implies "Every action within every moment within this space-time caused split into an infinite timeline." nor the universal mechanics like in my Xianxia scans.
This is a key action, especially linked to Chichigami who is also linked to time, so no there is no timeline for the different actions.You are showing a scan that demonstrates that LoL, it literally shows that for each action there would be a timeline with a different action, for example the Chichigami thing.
That is in fact, how this wiki works.I also remind you that in fiction there are different interpretations of real theory. Asking for a very specific mention is wrong in several ways. If this were the case, many anime would not go beyond 4D.
Can you prove otherwise?Lolol.
What scan? You limit yourself to responding with short or sarcastic commentsI don't state. I use scans.
Sure, could you provide where specifically in the wiki that is asked for?That is in fact, how this wiki works.
Ask any disscussion staff and they will answer you.Sure, could you provide where specifically in the wiki that is asked for?
These are all other parallel stories.You know DxD isn't specifically based on just time branching lol, the possibilities are not only limited to time branching we literally have the existence of ExE and FxF and more
You said it yourself, it's an important event, but just an ordinary event.In addition, we are told about chichigami because it is an important event, not limited to specific events.
Sure and extraordinary claims there is the need of extraordinary evidence. 2-A is 4-D and yeah that wouldn't be enough to reach Tier 1.I also remind you that in fiction there are different interpretations of real theory. Asking for a very specific mention is wrong in several ways. If this were the case, many anime would not go beyond 4D.
I'm asking you since you're the one who claims and is bringing that up.Ask any disscussion staff and they will answer you.
You need to align the fictional concept with the real ones in the exact same ways to get their tier, it is our general consensus. My friend @ActuallySpaceMan42 experienced this first hand before he became a staff.I'm asking you since you're the one who claims and is bringing that up.
If that’s the case then are the other CRTs that were accepted also even looked at? cause the staffs that agreed before NOW see how this was an error.
We got boob scaling before GTA6 ain’t no way-
Anyway uhh obviously agree with the downgrade, it’s absolutely silly that this passed lmao.
The scan showed that it's another timeline, I'm not making this up.Can you prove otherwise?
No more sarcastic than yours, I show the scans but uh you don't want to accept, and here is where we are.What scan? You limit yourself to responding with short or sarcastic comments
ExE is mentioned in EX and shin vol 4 and FxF is first mentioned in Shin Vol 4 which are main stories even Ex is a main story said by the authorThese are all other parallel stories.
Chichigami was mentioned because it's one of the direct references to the sister anime if you haven't read EX just say it lolYou said it yourself, it's an important event, but just an ordinary event.
In fact, for 2-A it only asks for an infinite amount of space-time continuum, it is nothing specific, just the common interpretation of space-time which is past, present and future, And what does tier 1 have to do with it? We are talking about tier 2-ASure and extraordinary claims there is the need of extraordinary evidence. 2-A is 4-D and yeah that wouldn't be enough to reach Tier 1.
I don't think so. I'll check the scaling eventually, there are some things that suck.If that’s the case then are the other CRTs that were accepted also even looked at? cause the staffs that agreed before NOW see how this was an error.
Timelines that are shown multiple times to be created by changes in different events whether they occur or not, it's not hard to understand that, right?The scan showed that it's another timeline, I'm not making this up.
Why am I sarcastic? I can show you screenshots of all my arguments which have scanned in exchange for yours notNo more sarcastic than yours, I show the scans but uh you don't want to accept, and here is where we are.
Being mentioned means? These are side stories that can be mentioned.ExE is mentioned in EX and shin vol 4 and FxF is first mentioned in Shin Vol 4 which are main stories even Ex is a main story said by the author
One more thing, it is said that timelines have their different events, which does not imply in any way that the timeline where Chichigami did not appear is created by a division, no. It is just a timeline with its different events, nothing tells you that the story there is even similar to the main story.Chichigami was mentioned because it's one of the direct references to the sister anime if you haven't read EX just say it lol
You mentioned going beyond 4-D, which for many who misuse it means going beyond Tier 2.In fact, for 2-A it only asks for an infinite amount of space-time continuum, it is nothing specific, just the common interpretation of space-time which is past, present and future, And what does tier 1 have to do with it? We are talking about tier 2-A
Blog 2-A asks for infinite space-time continua, which is not very difficult.this is proof no one really read the 2-A blog properly
Imma be real here, this means that we should look at the previous CRTs that were accepted cause this was beyond weird for it to even be passed if it was obvious that this was incorrect right from the start. I feel like we could be actually looking at wank hereYeah, all I can really say is I told you so.
Don't have the patience or time to go through these threads which are constantly getting stonewalled though, and not over DXD. Stopped being the guy that opposed these threads a while ago because the wank became so ridiculous and hard to keep up with, and for some reason staff just didn't actually look any deeper than the surface when accepting this stuff.
Agree with the OP.
Where does it say that they are created because of the different events? No scans prove it.Timelines that are shown multiple times to be created by changes in different events whether they occur or not, it's not hard to understand that, right?
Uh?Why am I sarcastic? I can show you screenshots of all my arguments which have scanned in exchange for yours not
Bro this is the main storyBeing mentioned means? These are side stories that can be mentioned.
Bro that's the anime timelineOne more thing, it is said that timelines have their different events, which does not imply in any way that the timeline where Chichigami did not appear is created by a division, no. It is just a timeline with its different events, nothing tells you that the story there is even similar to the main story.
Ahem, can you send where I mentioned that?You mentioned going beyond 4-D, which for many who misuse it means going beyond Tier 2.
It was so well disguised. The sandbox was so long. I fell for it myself.Imma be real here, this means that we should look at the previous CRTs that were accepted cause this was beyond weird for it to even be passed if it was obvious that this was incorrect right from the start. I feel like we could be actually looking at wank here
Ahem, chichigami, the nonexistence of the biblical is that clear or anything else?Where does it say that they are created because of the different events? No scans prove it.
Most of my statements have backup scanning, you only rely on responding with short comments and do not send evidence
Scan is said differently. Being mentioned does not mean it is part of it.Bro this is the main story
Yeah and the anime timeline is not created by a division. It's cooked.Bro that's the anime timeline
Ahem, can you send where I mentioned that?
Am I reading this wrong? Nah.I also remind you that in fiction there are different interpretations of real theory. Asking for a very specific mention is wrong in several ways. If this were the case, many anime would not go beyond 4D.
Read the explanation of the scanthere is no way in hell a staff member took this scan seriously when they were evaluating the 2-A blog
They are arguing that it is usablethere is no way in hell a staff member took this scan seriously when they were evaluating the 2-A blog
why would you choose someone else's explanation over the actual piece of evidenceRead the explanation of the scan
Timelines with different stories, timelines written by the author.Ahem, chichigami, the nonexistence of the biblical is that clear or anything else?
Because you want to make scans what they are not, something I have already explained.Most of my statements have backup scanning, you only rely on responding with short comments and do not send evidence
SScanning is said differently. Being mentioned does not mean it is part of it.
Can you send a scan where you test this?Yeah and the anime timeline is not created by a division. It's cooked.
Yes, I know you are reading it wrong, there I am implying that each anime has its way of interpreting things so it is wrong to ask for things too specifically.Am I reading this wrong? Nah.
You just perfectly described what happens when you change an event plus Rias in Wonderland is part of the main plot not secondaryTimelines with different stories, timelines written by the author.
Isn't that what you're doing? You're giving another explanation to the scansBecause you want to make scans what they are not, something I have already explained.
Beats me man, I wasn’t apart of the staff who agreed to it (though I don’t have any voting rights so it doesn’t matter either way lol). Honestly it’s a huge fumble for all of them who were involved.If that’s the case then are the other CRTs that were accepted also even looked at? cause the staffs that agreed before NOW see how this was an error.
Do you know that literally one of the staff didn't even take the time to read the op and has even been against all DxD updates?scarecrow you are going for the highest possible interpretation for the scans while we are being unbiased
While it has happened, I wouldn't say it's necessarily the case. The thing is, even ignoring the breast scans, mixing in the Telos Karma scans allows for some pretty deceptive trickery without knowledge of how the ability works, and they've added some nice justifications.Now we know for a fact that staff don’t actually read anything and will pass something of blatant wank.
Yeah we already know their routine.Of the times we got into arguments that tried to made us look like fools and the disrespect, THEY were wrong from the get go or purposely tried to wank.
I'll check the other CRTs but they still seem passable.This is a such a blunder that Ant needs to know bout this cause I can in good faith believe anything the CRTs that were accepted are accurate nor the people who agreed to it. Hell the staff that agreed before realized the mistake and now disagree with the upgrade