XSOULOFCINDERX
They/Them- 21,417
- 9,075
I say we should, just be careful of what gets accepted.Whether to use What If scaling or not
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I say we should, just be careful of what gets accepted.Whether to use What If scaling or not
Pretty sure this is the unspoken consensus cuz Strange got 9-A+ and the protection spell from What IfI say we should, just be careful of what gets accepted.
Agreed, but going from what you said about Mark 50 Iron Man backscaling, he would be "At most Country level", not Large Island level or Large Island level+I'd suggest that Tony should backscale tbh, he's able to harm Thanos but it takes absolutely everything he has to even draw blood with Thanos eventually ripping apart the armour without much issue. So Large Island - Large Island+ but I think we shouldn't put them in the same weight class as the Mad Titan if that makes sense. Mark L Iron Man in Endgame should scale tho
At most
Should be used to denote the higher cap of a character, if the exact value is indeterminate.
AgreedI say we should, just be careful of what gets accepted.
I mean isn't the country stuff based off the What If scaling? If that is the case then we should be very careful there. But if so, I think Large Island, At Most Country would work for themAgreed, but going from what you said about Mark 50 Iron Man backscaling, he would be "At most Country level", not Large Island level or Large Island level+
Frankly the 9-A+ is kinda unnecessary since we have 8-C scaling from the Goblin Bombs (Pretty sure this is the unspoken consensus cuz Strange got 9-A+ and the protection spell from What If
Post-Blip Strange is 8-C. Sorcerer Supreme Strange scales to 9-A+I mean isn't the country stuff based off the What If scaling? If that is the case then we should be very careful there. But if so, I think Large Island, At Most Country would work for them
Frankly the 9-A+ is kinda unnecessary since we have 8-C scaling from the Goblin Bombs (which I have to say I hate but that's just me)
Huh TIL, either way IDK why we'd assume he got so much stronger physically between films but that's just mePost-Blip Strange is 8-C. Sorcerer Supreme Strange scales to 9-A+
I don't either but I don't have a problem with itHuh TIL, either way IDK why we'd assume he got so much stronger physically between films but that's just me
Yeah, I was referring to if we use the featI mean isn't the country stuff based off the What If scaling? If that is the case then we should be very careful there. But if so, I think Large Island, At Most Country would work for them
Ah I see lmaoYeah, I was referring to if we use the feat
I was about to ask you guys if you're really trying to make a case for that ****** feat of all things lol
We would be legends if we made the MCU get upgraded to High 6-C and then to 6-B in this span of timeWe on the grind set lmao
Yeah but who the **** else is gonna scale to that barring the movie's top tier characters? The pre movie statements so far lead us to believe no one at all from the past is gonna scaleI mean, there's likely a High 6-A feat incoming with Love and Thunder around the corner...
Eh just "At most Country level" is fine. That's too long and unnecessary.I mean isn't the country stuff based off the What If scaling? If that is the case then we should be very careful there. But if so, I think Large Island, At Most Country would work for them
I don't agree with using Surtur's death explosion as a cap because of Asgard's inconsistent and undisclosed measurementsEh just "At most Country level" is fine. tbh.
But then again. Surtur was killed by 2 Teratons. The CM feat is 4 teratons
CM's feat is actually 17 teratons, and Asgard's size is to be recalced, plus:But then again. Surtur was killed by 2 Teratons. The CM feat is 4 teratons
Iirc someone earlier said that the attack killed Surtur cuz his destiny and therefore life was tied to fulfilling Ragnarok and destroying Asgard. I don't remember that, could someone explain?
It was something along these lines
It was. I just disagree with it being the be all end all because we don't even have disclosed measurementsThen we need to recalc it. Because that feat is the current cap.
That's weird, the converter told me otherwise. I hate raw joule values lmaoCM's feat is actually 17 teratons
The final value is in tons of tntI hate raw joule values lmao
W=1.7439258e+13 tons of tnt (Country level)
Bro **** the calc group people who don't give the yield in tons of TNTThat's weird, the converter told me otherwise. I hate raw joule values lmao
Based on what? Just curious.I mean, there's likely a High 6-A feat incoming with Love and Thunder around the corner...
Using Pluto as a lowball for the celestial body and ground explosion formula, the feat shown in the trailer yields 3.8 petatons, which is 6-A+Based on what? Just curious.
Thor smashing some sort of planetoid and creating a massive shockwave from it.Based on what? Just curious.
Ah. My bad. I misread
It's not in a blog, KLOL just said here that on a lowball it yields 3.8 petatonsIs there a calc for it already then? Can someone put it in the thread?
Yeah it's a weird cap, I've heard the prophecy thing but I think Occam's Razor imply it's just the feat that killed himSo I misread shit. Surtur died to 10 teratons. CM's feat is 17 Teratons. Doesn't change my point, but I'm tripping lmao
Give me the leaked dialogue.It's also worth noting Love and Thunder Thor is the strongest MCU version we've seen yet and may be > Surtur going by leaked dialogue so he shouldn't be taken as a counter to the Surtur feat
True but until we get a stated size as to Asgard's proportions it's really the best we can doI still don't agree with it being used as a cap without confirmed in universe sizes because all the different calcs of the explosion used different sizes leading me to believe there's no consistent size
SMH was in this thread I believeGive me the leaked dialogue.
I'm saying the "prophecy" statement kinda needlessly convolutes the feat. The simplest interpretation is we know Surtur would die destroying Asgard and the last we see him is in this massive explosion feat which we know outright killed Hela (one of the strongest characters at that point). Thus, the simplest take is not just that he spontaneously died via prophetic mechanics, but was killed performing this feat which also gives us a cap for the verse at this point
This. It's not that complex guyssaying the "prophecy" statement kinda needlessly convolutes the feat. The simplest interpretation is we know Surtur would die destroying Asgard and the last we see him is in this massive explosion feat which we know outright killed Hela (one of the strongest characters at that point). Thus, the simplest take is not just that he spontaneously died via prophetic mechanics, but was killed performing this feat which also gives us a cap for the verse at this point
I've been here this entire thread. It's not hereSMH was in this thread I believe
I mean, when the next Avengers movie eventually rolls around, you know that all the top tier are either going to be somewhat comparable to each other, or somewhat scaling to whoever the next big bad is, who should logically pose a threat to all of them.Yeah but who the **** else is gonna scale to that barring the movie's top tier characters? The pre movie statements so far lead us to believe no one at all from the past is gonna scale
I guess that’s fair, but even if we use it as a cap, the size of Asgard and the explosion stuff still needs to be recalcedI'm saying the "prophecy" statement kinda needlessly convolutes the feat. The simplest interpretation is we know Surtur would die destroying Asgard and the last we see him is in this massive explosion feat which we know outright killed Hela (one of the strongest characters at that point). Thus, the simplest take is not just that he spontaneously died via prophetic mechanics, but was killed performing this feat which also gives us a cap for the verse at this point