• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

God Tier 0 (Seekers into the Mystery)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, they are saying that Magician shouldn't be High 1-A+ because he's just an avatar.
If I understood that correctly, which isn't really true.
He may be saying that it should be 0, but if he argues that it should be even below High 1-A+, then yes, this is a very wrong idea.
 
As far as I know Tier 0 can create their own avatars, but the main point is that these avatars cannot communicate or interact with or go near to tier 0 being in any way.

Because there is no concept of "any place" for this being, it cannot be called "anything" because it lacks of all qualities and it is also superior/greater to them all. But of course Ultima knows better about it
While the Avatar (the Magician) is aware of His Reality, he can return to his Essence at any time. Technically speaking, the Avatar is already omnipotent, but He still harbors the meaningless effects of the illusion. (Although independent of it.)
 
I don't believe that changes anything at all, no. Overall, over the course of the above dialogue, there wasn't really anything going against the idea of a High 1-A+ key for God's manifestation at all. Here, you said:


And I think the answer to this is pretty straightforward: The Magician, insofar as he is God (Which everything and everyone is, at the core), is not limited by the illusion. But the Magician, insofar as he is manifested at all, exists in the illusion. So, in one respect, he is Tier 0, but the respect in which he is Tier 0 is precisely the respect in which he is not manifested as the Magician, to begin with.
Ultima already answered it here. 0 can have an avatar or manifestation as long they're being channel powers proxy to it. Though being an avatar is the limiting factor here the Magician was formed inside the Dream and works from the framework of Creation/Dream.
 
The Magician is not actually limited to illusion in either case. But Ultima said that even in the situation I mentioned above, he cannot be 0.

Since Ultima initially said that avatars or incarnations of 0 could also be 0, and I felt that the Magician fit into this situation, I felt the need to examine the topic.
 
The Magician is not actually limited to illusion in either case. But Ultima said that even in the situation I mentioned above, he cannot be 0.
The Magician was created by God in #9 to be physically tethered to mortal minds so that they could comprehend him. He obviously is still the same Oneness beyond all Creation, but still being created as a “physical shell” of his truer being is why he has High 1-A+ because he's manifested thus not beyond all distinction, notions, and contingency without being his ultimate self.
Since Ultima initially said that avatars or incarnations of 0 could also be 0, and I felt that the Magician fit into this situation, I felt the need to examine the topic.
When? The only example I've seen is that of something like Krishna from Hinduism or Jesus Christ from Christianity where they've just manifested a view of their ultimate concept and at will can return to it. However, while in the state of existence(which applies to the Magician) they're not 0, at that moment. You could argue for the Catholic doctrine approach of Jesus to be 0 simply because they accept that God and all his parts are no different and no differentiate between Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. This isn't the case for the Magician.
 
The Magician was created by God in #9 to be physically tethered to mortal minds so that they could comprehend him. He obviously is still the same Oneness beyond all Creation, but still being created as a “physical shell” of his truer being is why he has High 1-A+ because he's manifested thus not beyond all distinction, notions, and contingency without being his ultimate self.
This is the mission of Avatar. Although he is above all illusion, he also allows some things to restrict him while experiencing himself. As for God and His attributes in #9, as you stated, He reduces Himself to physical forms for the consciousness of souls in the spiral of ignorance.
When? The only example I've seen is that of something like Krishna from Hinduism or Jesus Christ from Christianity where they've just manifested a view of their ultimate concept and at will can return to it. However, while in the state of existence(which applies to the Magician) they're not 0, at that moment. You could argue for the Catholic doctrine approach of Jesus to be 0 simply because they accept that God and all his parts are no different and no differentiate between Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. This isn't the case for the Magician.
I distinctly remember Ultima saying this. But I guess the usage area of this seems to be quite limited because this was the clearest example in my mind. (I mean the Magician)
 
This is the mission of Avatar. Although he is above all illusion, he also allows some things to restrict him while experiencing himself. As for God and His attributes in #9, as you stated, He reduces Himself to physical forms for the consciousness of souls in the spiral of ignorance.
Yeah, sure, he's above all “illusion” but he, himself, is also “in” the illusion and was made within the Dream. It's pretty easy to know that his original existence is unconscious and unmanifest, but the Magician is formed and conscious, well aware of the illusion and his true being, but still emanates from a greater source.

So, yeah, due to him being in the illusions(doesn't matter, if he's above it all) and manifesting from a greater source as a sort of avatar while making himself also “physical” then he is bound to the illusions until he takes his creation back to the sea of nothing from which everything sprang.
 
Yeah, just like what Ultima said.

High 1-A for the magi and 0 for the actual God.
The funny thing is the Primal Ocean at a certain point isn't even described as God(It’s beyond naming and language thus God is a concept that would be treated in the same essence as just a useless term). That would be more akin to that being we see in #9. Though, that's really just semantical at that point.
 
Yeah... Like, this is basically one of the best examples of a 0 character in the new system
In any other given circumstances, I would understand. However, given the revision project is over and with eager people wanting to make CRT. I believe that moving on with the obvious thread would be easier but it is what it is.
 

Alright, so, I applied the profile revisions. I'll keep the thread open for a bit and leave it paraded around here, in case anyone has anything to say about it.
 
This might’ve been answered already, but if The Magician is literally a Vessel for God’s power (Tier 0) to be channeled through, how come it isn’t Tier 0 through hax or some such ?
 
This might’ve been answered already, but if The Magician is literally a Vessel for God’s power (Tier 0) to be channeled through, how come it isn’t Tier 0 through hax or some such ?
Any effect that a Tier 0 produces out of itself is infinitely lesser than it, so the tier properly speaking is restricted to the "essence" of the thing, and isn't given to the avatar.
 
Any effect that a Tier 0 produces out of itself is infinitely lesser than it, so the tier properly speaking is restricted to the "essence" of the thing, and isn't given to the avatar.
Hm. I see. So in what case scenario would it be that someone would be able to have Tier 0 hax then ? Would it be something along the lines of: “[Insert Tier 0] helps , assists, or grants the wishes/desires of the character in question”, or are there other simpler examples ?
 
Hm. I see. So in what case scenario would it be that someone would be able to have Tier 0 hax then ? Would it be something along the lines of: “[Insert Tier 0] helps , assists, or grants the wishes/desires of the character in question”, or are there other simpler examples ?
Pretty much, yeah. You can say the hax is Tier 0 as regards its efficaciousness, since it flows from what defines everything on all levels (And to which even an hypothetical High 1-A+ would be subordinate), but it's not like they can make a Tier 0 explosion or something.
 
Pretty much, yeah. You can say the hax is Tier 0 as regards its efficaciousness, since it flows from what defines everything on all levels (And to which even an hypothetical High 1-A+ would be subordinate), but it's not like they can make a Tier 0 explosion or something.
Thank you. Makes sense

One last question and I should be good: I noticed how you put one of the justification for Tier 0 being that he is beyond naming. Why would that be a justification ? (This isn’t the only time DeMatteis referred to a All-Encompass Divine Entity as beyond naming, that was the “God” equivalent from Impossible Incorporated , so I figured I should figure out how that works as justification for Tier 0 in case this shows up again)
 
I noticed how you put one of the justification for Tier 0 being that he is beyond naming. Why would that be a justification ? (This isn’t the only time DeMatteis referred to a All-Encompass Divine Entity as beyond naming, that was the “God” equivalent from Impossible Incorporated , so I figured I should figure out how that works as justification for Tier 0 in case this shows up again)
Mostly just there as a minor piece of supporting evidence to top off the rest, since it points to the general theme that God is beyond thought and intellection. Wouldn't be there if the rest of the justification didn't also exist.
 

Alright, so, I applied the profile revisions. I'll keep the thread open for a bit and leave it paraded around here, in case anyone has anything to say about it.
So, this counts as being “accepted” and the next thread in the queue is being opened?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top