- 18,393
- 14,323
Why type 5 and 7 should stay? I can understand type 7 argument but no one showed evidence once everything12 asked
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What? I still don't see any evidence for type 7. Everything12 requested and no one brought it. Even type 5.What? People explain why type 7 should say when he asked.
type 5 someone above gave another reason which I didn’t see anyone refute to unlike omniscience.
This is all for Type 5.For those arguing for types 5 and 7 please lay down the arguments once more with scans.
Type 7 I kind of understand as well but type 5 I believe needs to be established more.
Everything posted there is cannon I know the chapters.@Hatredd is the second scan you used for immortality type 5 justification canon?
Yes, everything is canon material, the manhwa has no filler whatsoever, every chapter is vital.@Hatredd is the second scan you used for immortality type 5 justification canon?
But Hatredd did say in the imgur link why. The translator conceded and explained why, and there are reasons to believe why the first translation may be off, again stated in the imgur link.I don't know why would you cut the main translation but here
It says, where all of universe and creation may be observed
I actually asked for whole context translation.Hrmrm good suggestion, tbh one of the main reasons I used 'all' was because I wanted it to flow smoothly into 'all of ... creation' as well, I guess one more hangup would be it quite cements that they're referring to more than one universe, whereas in the original it doesn't super clarify that, hence why I used just 'universe' so it could be singular but also referring to like a huge multiplicative concept (Universe, oh maybe I should've just capitalized Universe lol), but yeah that could be a good option too!
Also supported by a native korean. A native agreed with "all universes"/"every universe" and this translator easily conceded and said "oh, if "all universes"/"every universe" sounds more natural, it may be better", also agreeing previously that adding "들" to "universe" would have made the sentence sound clunky.He really did not concede, he said why it he suggested it first and because it is smooth.
I actually asked for whole context translation.
tbh one of the main reasons I used 'all' was because I wanted it to flow smoothly into 'all of ... creation' as well
I don't think he conceded, he said it is a good option/perspective.whereas in the original it doesn't super clarify that, hence why I used just 'universe' so it could be singular but also referring to like a huge multiplicative concept (Universe, oh maybe I should've just capitalized Universe lol)
He really did not concede, he said why it he suggested it first and because it is smooth.
And this was also specified in Hatredd's imgur link, he may have done a simple mistake. Yes, it would've been smoother if "삼라만상" was written as "전체 창조". But it wasn't. It's a single word that means "everything", "all of creation". You can't restructure it to say "all of universe and creation" in the sentence, since the "all" in "all of creation" is part of the same word.It was optional comment. I would rather trust the first translation of him because he has reasons why he thought this.
Happy 5,680069420th (or something idk) birthday!!1!! (man's super old )Oh, kind of unrelated but it's actually Mori's birthday today!
Dwi feel so stupid, im sorry
Immortality? It's much based on religion stuff rather than canonity. SorryWhat's your view on the justification for Type 5 btw? Forgot to ask this earlier
Unsure but the OP said that the profile lacks some referencesAh ok, and about references, what do we add for them.
Sound like an rock/metal album nameHatred, do you perhaps use translator while talking here?
I am asking because no one say "no food in my system"
FrSound like an rock/metal album name
The stuff that’s been rejected has been withdrawn. I’m still waiting more on opinions for type 5 before adding that back in again though. But for now it’s been removed along with transduality and Acausality type 3I will wait for what has already been rejected to be withdrawn before saying anything, as I don't know what has already been discussed and what has not
Huhh type 5 and 7 was remove? when they were being supported.The stuff that’s been rejected has been withdrawn. I’m still waiting more on opinions for type 5 before adding that back in again though. But for now it’s been removed along with transduality and Acausality type 3