Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This more like necroBump, I'm interested in this
I think it is because type is 3 still bound by reality , defferent between those two is difficultWasn't there a question like this before? iirc, no it isn't more impressive. In either of these cases, you don't have a concept regardless.
I'm interested because i know a verse when person 1 is NEP 2 and is an void/nothingness (and was conceptualy erased), but character 2 is something called "" and something that character 1 was not being able to reach and alredy tell to be beyond in non existance and character 1 "exist" somewhat in character 2Wasn't there a question like this before? iirc, no it isn't more impressive. In either of these cases, you don't have a concept regardless.
Not really sure, but isn't that just a deeper level of NEP2? I believe there was something like that.I'm interested because i know a verse when person 1 is NEP 2 and is an void/nothingness (and was conceptualy erased), but character 2 is something called "" and something that character 1 was not being able to reach and alredy tell to be beyond in non existance and character 1 "exist" somewhat in character 2
I know both don't have concept , but different between type3 and 2 is more over transcendance , you reason might be mean you can touch conceptual embodiment type 3 and you can touch type 2 conceptual embodiment as well because both are conceptYou still don't have a concept, even if it was concept type 3.
If a character can affect a NEP2 being who was erased by type 3 concept manip, he can also affect another NEP2 being who was erased by Type 2 concept manip.
Not really sure, but isn't that just a deeper level of NEP2? I believe there was something like that.
I don't know it's why i'm interested, people tell me that concept type 2 or even type 1 can't affect NEP2 if not show so well...Can't that same argument be used for soul manip?
Character A got his soul removed by 3-D being, therefore he is soulless.
Character B has 4-D soul manip, which is infinitely superior to 3-D soul manip.
Would character B able to affect A or not? Or is this a false equivalence exchange?
Definitely false equivalence since the 4D can't manipulate nothing to begin with, while Type 2 CM can still affect a Type 2 NEP got via Type 3 CM since it is still something for a Type 2 concept while for Type 3 not anymore.Can't that same argument be used for soul manip?
Character A got his soul removed by 3-D being, therefore he is soulless.
Character B has 4-D soul manip, which is infinitely superior to 3-D soul manip.
Would character B able to affect A or not? Or is this a false equivalence exchange?
I mean, like Type 1 NEP is still a concept for Type 3 CM, Type 2 NEP got from CM 3 Erasure is still a concept for Type 2 CMIf someone has NEP for lacking a concept (type 3), but gets affected by type 2 conceptual manipulation, then you're implying that they have a concept type 2
I think like that tooHmm. Probably not if it's not specified. Because while having your concept erased, would erase you from history retroactively, the reverse doesn't have to be true.
This is kinda the problem with the definitions as I said before, a type 3 concept is directly tied to the object so when you get erased your concept gets erased with you and vise versa. But because the definition has the added "existing as an idea or other unconventional state", it's vague enough that would allow for you to have a concept of "you" while being erased at the same time.