- 10,398
- 4,564
- Thread starter
- #41
Nah a planet is a 3D object, thus on a planetary scale is 3D.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Generator Rex Meta-Nanites Re-upgrade
- Thread starter Greenshifter
- Start date
-
- Tags
- generator rex rex salazar
- Status
- 1,243
- 782
Unless the dimension it self is only planetary if not having control over all of space-time should easily be universa level plus. 4d is the 3 dimension of space and 1 dimension of time. It makes no space for the space to just be planetary when the length, height and breadth is universal in size.
- 2,127
- 1,726
- 1,243
- 782
True honestly I think this is very straightforward.
- 9,994
- 10,849
Entropy pump can destroy the reality of several light years.
- 31,656
- 34,719
On second thought, this is a legit Low 2-C over time feat.
- 9,994
- 10,849
I like that line most in current high 3a.
- 9,994
- 10,849
Anyway as @Greenshifter has quoted my favourite line from high 3a definition, I also agree with low 2c.
- 10,398
- 4,564
- Thread starter
- #50
And thus not 4D, unless it's several light years in 4 dimensions.
- 9,994
- 10,849
Don't ruin my mood, I am happy because of the line you quoted, it's done. Have my agreement for rest of the crt's of your life.
- 10,398
- 4,564
- Thread starter
- #52
Sure, I’ll write that down
- 15,969
- 12,398
I think Low 2-C is fine but I'm unsure whether or not it's over time or not since no other context is given.
- 1,243
- 782
Even if it is overtime I still believe they will be creating an infinite space in a finite time still low 2-c
- 9,994
- 10,849
What griffin meant is that low 2c is fine but "over time" should be removed as there is nothing known about it. Straight "low 2c" would be better.
- 531
- 57
This
- 12,813
- 5,953
This is the most blatant universe lvl feat. It can't get any more blatant than this
- 7,641
- 7,807
No issues with Low 2-C.
- 9,994
- 10,849
@Greenshifter you have got enough inputs, apply for changes.
And Don't forget to edit it to "low 2c" as per this thread, previously he was "possibly low 2c" which is outdated.
And Don't forget to edit it to "low 2c" as per this thread, previously he was "possibly low 2c" which is outdated.
Last edited:
- 32,835
- 38,111
Correct. Once you go High 3-A and beyond, division is effectively useless. Infinity divided by anything is still infinity. Time itself becomes meaningless when you deal with Tier 2 structures.
You also do not have to destroy them either to qualify, just significantly affect them as a bare minimum.
IDK fam, that line explicitly referred to controlling all of them simultaneously, if you can control it all at the same time, Occam's Razor dictates you'd be able to control the Universe however you desire given that they as per the statements control how the universe functions.
That alone has caused me to revert my stance on the previous thread. I agree with a reversion back to Tier 2.
Last edited:
- 9,994
- 10,849
Best razor of all time
- 9,994
- 10,849
- 2,127
- 1,726
Fair enough.
- 2,127
- 1,726
Same production house
- 10,398
- 4,564
- Thread starter
- #66
Considering this seems accepted, I updated Rex's page and gave him universal+ range (in this key). This thread can be closed.
- Status
