Galaxy News: The Milky Way just got bigger

[Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan]

Though Universe level is supposed to be the Universe, not Observable Universe

 

[Andytrenom]

Baseline Universe level is only the observable universe iirc.

 

[Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan]

That's only a lowballed calculation.

 

[The_Causality]

So the new value for destroying the galaxy from the epicenter is:

• i'll use the Sphere formula so 100000 ly = 1.12476E+43 m2
• Sun radius = 1.52e18 m2
• E = (1.12476E+43)/(1.52E+18)*(GBE of the sun)
• E = 7,2E+24*(2.27e41 J)
• E = 1,6E+66 for destroying the galaxy from the center

i have made probably an error....

I would like to know if the value I calculate will be the new baseline (although I doubt it)

 

[Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan]

Don't think so.

 

[Mand21]

Should we recalc Universe Level, then?

That'll sure make 3-B a lot bigger... I mean, every time you multiply the radius of the explosion, the energy needed is multiplied by the square of that, right? Making so that we have to multiply the present value by 62 500.

That buffs Tier 3-A's baseline all the way up to 4,44375e+97 Joules, or 444.3 Tenazetafoe. 3-B's bottom to cap ratio also goes from 23 orders of magnitude to 28 orders of magnitude.

Of course, if the universe is actually so large it makes the googolplex look like shit, then we might as well have characters who destroy the observable universe be 3-B.

 

[Antvasima]

I would prefer more input from knowledgeable members such as DontTalkDT first.

 

[Antoniofer]

Besides what DT said, Matt and me already make notice that the spiral hasn't increased its size, if not that celestial bodies outside of it are affected by the galaxy's gravity, the spiral still has its common size, what is generally addressed in the feats.

 

[Antvasima]

Yes, we will not update the galaxy size in our tiering system, but the conversation seems to have shifted towards the minimum universe size instead.

 

[Assaltwaffle]

The stars on the outer rim of our galaxy would still be visible, even if not in the main spiral. Reducing our galaxy into nothing/destroying it would indeed require the destruction of the outer stars out else the outer galaxy would still be visible.

This is different than treating every object in the Sun's gravity as solar system level.

On the baseline universe, I am totally against using any hypothetical projection of the universe's true size. The universe's size is completely unknown and this is agreed on by science. The estimates are nice, but they are nothing but vaguely scientific estimations. We know the size of the observable universe; we can't observe or measure anything else and shouldn't use anything else.

 

[Kepekley23]

The universe can actually be smaller than what we can observe.

 

[Overlord775]

The universe can actually be smaller than what we can observe.

how ?

 

[Kepekley23]

The galaxies we observe near the edge of the observable universe may be actually copies of other nearby galaxies when they were "younger", which means they're not actually there. That'd take a few billions light years out of the universe's diameter.

 

[Kepekley23]

That said, there's a less than 0.04% chance of that being the case, since the universe is very, veeery likely flat.

 

[Mand21]

It would be pretty cool if it were true, though. Would allow us to better fathom the size of our universe.

 

[Overlord775]

That said, there's a less than 0.04% chance of that being the case, since the universe is very, veeery likely flat.

nah, it the universe is a 4th dimensional shape we cannot percive in it's totality, so to our eyes snd scienze the universe is flat

ovo

 

[Assaltwaffle]

It would be pretty cool if it were true, though. Would allow us to better fathom the size of our universe.

Still utterly unfathomable. Anything beyond 1 LY is just absurd.

 

[Ryukama]

the universe is very, veeery likely flat.

just like the earth

 

[Kepekley23]

I've seen people unironically saying sun rays are just the Sun reflecting on the dome.

 

[ABoogieYesSir]

No wonder why that the week's go fast now.

 

[Mand21]

It would be pretty cool if it were true, though. Would allow us to better fathom the size of our universe.

Still utterly unfathomable. Anything beyond 1 LY is just absurd.

You think so? >.> I kinda tend to think that the way the size ratios start to scale more lightly once you get to the size of tiny galaxies makes up for the ridiculous difference from the size of a star to that of even the smallest dwarf galaxy.

But, welp, we can't even properly grasp sizes like that of the Earth in terms of storytelling unless they're broken into smaller bits we can chew.