Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
900 pounds while being massively tall wouldn't make one look like nikocado avocado but maybe somewhat like Lizzo but still be less dummy thick than her.Oh come on, GF being 900 lbs is clearly a joke. Even if one were to take BF being 7 feet tall to heart, that would just lead to GF being Nikocado Avocado (Spoilers! The two look nothing alike!).
900 pounds while being massively tall wouldn't make one look like nikocado avocado but maybe somewhat like Lizzo but still be less dummy thick than her.
What?so basically still nikocado
Gotta be the weirdest bump I've ever seen.
come on,she being 900 pounds could be justify by''demons have different physiology''What?
They docome on,she being 900 pounds could be justify by''demons have different physiology''
thatThey do
like the above one sayplease someone help with how we will format point 4, tried not to say explicitly about the futanari
I don't understand everything that the video says, (I speak Spanish) so I need someone to confirm the ability and write what we will put in the profile
finally, thanks"Demons can alter their bodies via magic"
You need 2 staff agreementsSo... I have to wait for an admin or I can already make the changes in the profiles?
The entire gow verse dying:What if we made it so that in order for something to be confirmed canon, it needs to have more evidence than a tweet? Since the devs are known to lie and troll fans about the canonicity of certain things, we could make it so that it would need direct acknowledgment in-game/secondary canon in order to be used.
At least they aren't known to lie to their fansThe entire gow verse dying:
What if we made it so that in order for something to be confirmed canon, it needs to have more evidence than a tweet? Since the devs are known to lie and troll fans about the canonicity of certain things, we could make it so that it would need direct acknowledgment in-game/secondary canon in order to be used.
Yeah, we don't know for sure whether they are serious or not, so we shouldn't use it. We always assume the negative first, and someone has to prove it to be true. If the only evidence is a handful of tweets that could be true, but could equally be a joke, then it shouldn't be applied.bro, the game is in so much development, that the only lore there is, is literally the creators saying something, for something to be a joke, they have to say it,because even the most stupid one,could be death serios
Yeah, we don't know for sure whether they are serious or not, so we shouldn't use it. We always assume the negative first, and someone has to prove it to be true. If the only evidence is a handful of tweets that could be true, but could equally be a joke, then it shouldn't be applied.
My guy, if they have a history of consistently joking about lore related stuff on twitter, than we should assume that they are joking in a twitter. Especially since there isn't any in-game things to back it up.because we assume the negative, instead of simply assuming the opposite until proven to be so. I mean, you can't assume without proof that it's a joke.
it's needs to be the opposite,proof is a joke,don't proof is not
because the game is in deveploment?and again,if is not say to be a joke,then is not a jokeMy guy, if they have a history of consistently joking about lore related stuff on twitter, than we should assume that they are joking in a twitter. Especially since there isn't any in-game things to back it up.
The game being in development doesn't mean anything; just that they are working on the mechanics and lore. Hell, it could be argued that since they are still developing the game, we shouldn't take what they say on twitter as canon, since they haven't fully decided what the lore will be. Also, them saying something isn't a joke could be in and of itself another joke.because the game is in deveploment?and again,if is not say to be a joke,then is not a joke
you want to argue the paradox of jokes, I say that something is not a joke, but then I say that if it was, then what should I believe? that it was or was not a joke.The game being in development doesn't mean anything; just that they are working on the mechanics and lore. Hell, it could be argued that since they are still developing the game, we shouldn't take what they say on twitter as canon, since they haven't fully decided what the lore will be. Also, them saying something isn't a joke could be in and of itself another joke.
You would have to believe it is a joke, since that is the result that would cause the negative i.e. Not changing the profile.you want to argue the paradox of jokes, I say that something is not a joke, but then I say that if it was, then what should I believe? that it was or was not a joke.
It's not finalized, so we cannot use it.,and again,you have proof that the lore is not like they say?
I honestly can't understand what you're saying.again, you can't just assume that the lore is this, because you'd be doing what the fnf community does all the time, assume that the lore is ''this'' when they then go with a ''what?'' face when they find out that bf is a son of a bitch, gf is too rude, there are too many off-color jokes or ridiculous jokes (Lol, daddy having "look down" face in the nenodorian comic)
It would be fine to take lore from the devs...if they weren't known for consistently lying and joking about lore related stuff. So, in order to avoid potentially unfounded lore, we should only stick to what is in the game currently and what will be in the game once it comes out.there is no lore in fnf for know,we need to take the lore for the creators themselfs,until they say is a joke(a true joke)
I can't do that. I'm not a mod, which means I don't have any sole authority on what is and isn't allowed, and it would be rude to everyone else who actively partakes in FNF debates. If a majority of the people in this CRT/a mod agrees with my logic, then it can a rule for upgrades and downgrades in the future.@Da3ggman but if you want to inssist,then make a rule about it,there is no one stopping you
so,that means that tecnically it will stay the sameI can't do that. I'm not a mod, which means I don't have any sole authority on what is and isn't allowed, and it would be rude to everyone else who actively partakes in FNF debates. If a majority of the people in this CRT/a mod agrees with my logic, then it can a rule for upgrades and downgrades in the future.
If the majority of the people who participated in this thread disagree with my line of logic, then yes; if they agree, then it will likely change.so,that means that tecnically it will stay the same
but the majority of people does not disagree(there aren't even mods here)If the majority of the people who participated in this thread disagree with my line of logic, then yes; if they agree, then it will likely change.
To my knowledge, they haven't put their input on it, which would mean that their vote would act like a neutral one until they do say their opinion on it.but the majority of people does not disagree(there aren't even mods here)
okTo my knowledge, they haven't put their input on it, which would mean that their vote would act like a neutral one until they do say their opinion on it.
I meant using WoG statements exclusively to support the addition of new abilities, not using WoG for clarification or if it also is supported in-game.Some WoG statements are fine to use, as they support things already shown in-game. Stuff like Monster's perception manip, for example
i mean,how do you know the height and weight of characters if there is no mentioning in the series?I meant using WoG statements exclusively to support the addition of new abilities, not using WoG for clarification or if it also is supported in-game.
Calculationsi mean,how do you know the height and weight of characters if there is no mentioning in the series?