- 4,976
- 1,741
Title, trying to check but we seem to only have spines in the references for common feats. Bonus as well if I can also calculate the force of tearing off armored arms.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Checked it just now but the results are simply too varied with too many variables.
If we just go off the horse thing, more or less the same.I guess that could work.
Do note that simply dislocating arms from their shoulder sockets without tearing off the limb won't qualify for this (IIRC that has its own lifting strength value but I think feats for pulling arms off sockets on their own should also be fine), you need to completely rip off the arm from the body, bone+muscle and all that sweet, sweet gore.
Now then, what are the values for ripping legs off?
IDK about this, the 2006 N (204 kgf) value seems too low, this assumes that someone like Halfthor Bjornson could rip out an arm by himself, which, even for a record-breaking strongman like him, I'm pretty sure is impossible.There's this document from the University of Leicester I found. I used it in one of my tearing arms calc.
I have to agree on this.IDK about this, the 2006 N (204 kgf) value seems too low, this assumes that someone like Halfthor Bjornson could rip out an arm by himself, which I'm pretty sure is impossible.
I meant the value of tensile strength value, given it's sourced. The article seemingly ****** up the conversion of cross-sectional area though: it says it's a surface area of 3.14e-4 m2, but I got 3.14e-2 m2 which then gives a force of 200,646 Newtons or 20,453.211 kgf (Class 25).IDK about this, the 2006 N (204 kgf) value seems too low, this assumes that someone like Halfthor Bjornson could rip out an arm by himself, which, even for a record-breaking strongman like him, I'm pretty sure is impossible.
That makes a lot more sense, and is consistent to the 200kN requirement.I got 3.14e-2 m2 which then gives a force of 200,646 Newtons or 20,453.211 kgf (Class 25).
bruhI meant the value of tensile strength value, given it's sourced. The article seemingly ****** up the conversion of cross-sectional area though: it says it's a surface area of 3.14e-4 m2, but I got 3.14e-2 m2 which then gives a force of 200,646 Newtons or 20,453.211 kgf (Class 25).
Wait, how did they **** up the conversion?I meant the value of tensile strength value, given it's sourced. The article seemingly ****** up the conversion of cross-sectional area though: it says it's a surface area of 3.14e-4 m2, but I got 3.14e-2 m2 which then gives a force of 200,646 Newtons or 20,453.211 kgf (Class 25).
That's an embarrassing mistake for an University to make, let me tell ya.
I would've commented my own opinion on the document, but I think everyone else covered it for me.There's this document from the University of Leicester I found. I used it in one of my tearing arms calc.
Pretty much, except the document royally screwed up in converting cm to m, and we had to fix it.I would've commented my own opinion on the document, but I think everyone else covered it for me.
I'll let you take the honors then. You can contact a bunch of calc members to then look at it if you wish.Sure.
To be honest, most calcs are like that. In VS, most calculations are oversimplified.Checked it just now but the results are simply too varied with too many variables.
This was actually before we found out about the pdf that Migue provided us with.To be honest, most calcs are like that. In VS, most calculations are oversimplified.
It's not as impresive as it seems. If you draw a free body diagram you can see that there's only 1 horse per limb. And a single horse can only pull with as much force as the friction with the ground provides.Funny thing is, not even a legion of four horses is enough to reliably dismember a person, they still had to make cuts in the joints to make it easier after the horses failed from multiple attempts.
In which case you gotta account for net force. In this case, four forces are acting on one object. The idea of four forces canceling each other out like that, depending on how you look at it (whether it be one on each corner or two on each side), is impressive.It's not as impresive as it seems. If you draw a free body diagram you can see that there's only 1 horse per limb.
BASEDIn which case you gotta account for net force. In this case, four forces are acting on one object. The idea of four forces canceling each other out like that, depending on how you look at it (whether it be one on each corner or two on each side), is impressive.
Even if we were to go off 500 kgf, the body would effectively be withstanding 2000 kgf at the center (and yes, the center does matter in physics).
2.5 tonnes for a weak-ass dude like me, and I'm not the average dude. Normal average dudes have wider arms than me and will prolly need more oomph there.So ripping an arm off requires somewhere between 2.5 and 25 tonnes of force? That's quite the gap
Well if the dude they've torn the arm off was clearly not any normal dude, Class 25 is good enoughSo how would this be applied to all the characters who have done this? "At least Class 5 to Class 25"?
Couldn't say, we'd need the distance the work is being carried out on. And I haven't the foggiest idea of where that distance would be measured in the arm joints.What is the energy in AP?