• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Fnaf at freddys discussion thread!

one thing that always kinda bugged me is why are the FNAF 1 Character Renders on Bonnie and Chica's Profile are Weird, Off Replicas of the Actual Renders made by Scott
 
The question is if you know how to edit, if so, you can probably apply the fixes yourself, just link the CRT in the changes box.

Assuming that the OG4 withered animatronics actually do scale(don't really see the vision) then toys, Puppet, GF, Springtrap, probably Fredbear.
GRAHHHH After hours, I finally finished applying the Fixes, and also adding the Possibly 9-B to the ones you said Scale to them (besides JJ, Balloon boy and Shadow Bonnie, im pretty confused by them)
 
currently, our scaling looks something like this:

Humans < FNAF 2 = FNAF 1 <= Golden = Fredbear = Springtrap < FNAF SL

FNAF 1 = William < UCN

Anything in text color green is a "possibly".

Bassically: humans in general are weaker than the anims, FNAF 2 and 1 are comparable according to the profiles, and alive Will possibly is. Golden scales to Fnaf 1, but if a stronger feat appeared for him, it would only scale to the springlocks, and not fnaf 1, that's why he is "superior or equal to FNAF 1". That springlocks are comparable due to being made the same, and FNAF SL are the only animatronics actually made to kill, so they should be superior to everything else in the verse, at least at the time of their creation. Then, the UCN anims can rip apart Will, so they are logically superior.
 
currently, our scaling looks something like this:

Humans < FNAF 2 = FNAF 1 = William <= Golden = Fredbear = Springtrap < FNAF SL

William < UCN

Anything in text color green is a "possibly".

Bassically: humans in general are weaker than the anims, FNAF 2 and 1 are comparable according to the profiles, and alive Will possibly is. Golden scales to Fnaf 1, but if a stronger feat appeared for him, it would only scale to the springlocks, and not fnaf 1, that's why he is "superior or equal to FNAF 1". That springlocks are comparable due to being made the same, and FNAF SL are the only animatronics actually made to kill, so they should be superior to everything else in the verse, at least at the time of their creation. Then, the UCN anims can rip apart Will, so they are logically superior.
so considering the UCN key of William was possibly Street in dura (now Possibly Street or Wall, after I applied the changes) would that mean Every UCN Animatronic that killed William should get Possibly 9-B too?
 
so considering the UCN key of William was possibly Street in dura (now Possibly Street or Wall, after I applied the changes) would that mean Every UCN Animatronic that killed William should get Possibly 9-B too?
I wopuld like to hear some other opinions, but yeah,, I believe that would be the case.
 
I wopuld like to hear some other opinions, but yeah,, I believe that would be the case.
I just realized smth, TOYSHK has 9-C to Possibly 9-B Summoning yet everyone's UCN key is just 9-C (even before I started applying the fixes, the og gang either has possibly 9-b on FNAF 2 Key or special delivery but not UCN)

so I'm guessing The UCN keys were supposed to get Possibly 9-B?

guh I'm freaking confused on this
 
I just realized smth, TOYSHK has 9-C to Possibly 9-B Summoning yet everyone's UCN key is just 9-C (even before I started applying the fixes, the og gang either has possibly 9-b on FNAF 2 Key or special delivery but not UCN)

so I'm guessing The UCN keys were supposed to get Possibly 9-B?

guh I'm freaking confused on this
someone made that error and it never got corrected.

However, I believe since no one has said anything against it, it is an error no more
 
currently, our scaling looks something like this:

Humans < FNAF 2 = FNAF 1 <= Golden = Fredbear = Springtrap < FNAF SL

FNAF 1 = William < UCN

Anything in text color green is a "possibly".

Bassically: humans in general are weaker than the anims, FNAF 2 and 1 are comparable according to the profiles, and alive Will possibly is. Golden scales to Fnaf 1, but if a stronger feat appeared for him, it would only scale to the springlocks, and not fnaf 1, that's why he is "superior or equal to FNAF 1". That springlocks are comparable due to being made the same, and FNAF SL are the only animatronics actually made to kill, so they should be superior to everything else in the verse, at least at the time of their creation. Then, the UCN anims can rip apart Will, so they are logically superior.
so do I give circus baby a Possibly 9-B too?
 
Guys, we should really get around to doing that multiple selves GF CRT. Feel like we should do that. We don't even have to mention the FF books! The Survival Logbook and TWB should be enough, although the FF books can be used as supplimentary evidence.
 
Guys, we should really get around to doing that multiple selves GF CRT. Feel like we should do that. We don't even have to mention the FF books! The Survival Logbook and TWB should be enough, although the FF books can be used as supplimentary evidence.
Feel free to do that
 
Is there an avenue for Golden Freddy's stamina to be indexed as possibly Infinite? Unlike the other animatronics, they have no discernible power source nor an implied necessity for it, and seem to have perpetually operated as a haunted vessel since at least 1987, which is long after the Fredbear animatronic was discontinued
 
I was looking through the FNAF Categories and I somehow found Twisted Foxy in those Categories
still somehow standing despite the whole FNAF Profile Deletion thing back in 2023

 
That's a theory and not confirmed.

Not true in the games.

Compellty false.

Not confirmed by any real source, nor if it was true would actually prove anything outside the ITP game to be actually canon to the games.

Let's not even begin to talk about all the changes that were done before the "return to pit" book.
i came back again to disappear

1) the man in room 1280, well even if it's a theory you need direct confirmation that the animatronics from ucn are the same versions of the animatronics from the games
2) well and in the trilogy of novels Afton is not the strongest character, but you're on this wiki still write about it in the brief information about the trilogy of novels + use information from the fazbear frights remnant for the games remnant))))
3) then delete all the information about remnant that is taken from the fazbear frights (if you say that remnant from the fazbear frights is the same remnant from the games, then you accept that the fazbear frights are canon, but if they are not canon, then you need direct words that remnant in the fazbear frights is the same remnant that from the games), for us it is not canon)))
4) all these books are connected by a common history (like all the others), they all take place in the games: vip pre sb, week pre fnaf 1, return to the pit pre hw, return to pizzaplex pre sb. Even if we forget about it, there is a direct statement from Scott that some stories will be directly connected to the games, and some will not (this can be interpreted as: 1) some are fillers, others are direct continuations of the story. 2) allegories) so if you don't use them as direct continuations of the story, there are still allegories.
 
i came back again to disappear

1) the man in room 1280, well even if it's a theory you need direct confirmation that the animatronics from ucn are the same versions of the animatronics from the games
2) well and in the trilogy of novels Afton is not the strongest character, but you're on this wiki still write about it in the brief information about the trilogy of novels + use information from the fazbear frights remnant for the games remnant))))
3) then delete all the information about remnant that is taken from the fazbear frights (if you say that remnant from the fazbear frights is the same remnant from the games, then you accept that the fazbear frights are canon, but if they are not canon, then you need direct words that remnant in the fazbear frights is the same remnant that from the games), for us it is not canon)))
4) all these books are connected by a common history (like all the others), they all take place in the games: vip pre sb, week pre fnaf 1, return to the pit pre hw, return to pizzaplex pre sb. Even if we forget about it, there is a direct statement from Scott that some stories will be directly connected to the games, and some will not (this can be interpreted as: 1) some are fillers, others are direct continuations of the story. 2) allegories) so if you don't use them as direct continuations of the story, there are still allegories.
Fazbear Frights is canon, just a different timeline. As such, general rules like remnant capabilities translate. However, the story itself, as you said, is only similar in vague ways, and it's pretty unclear what is meant to be taken literally.

Also, about some other points:
Actually, I'm gonna say something a little controversial, but not long ago I heard that while in the ITP book there are 6 MCI kids, in the interactive novel there are 5 (like in the games), so there is a very big possibility that the interactive novel is actually canon without implementing either the game or book.
 
The very existence of RTTP axes the Stitchwraith Stingers' continuity from that of the games

One is very in-continuity with the former, while RTTP is in a series of books that is damn near certainly in the games' continuity
 
Fazbear Frights is canon, just a different timeline. As such, general rules like remnant capabilities translate. However, the story itself, as you said, is only similar in vague ways, and it's pretty unclear what is meant to be taken literally.

Also, about some other points:
and here I am again

1) where does it say that this is a different timeline?
2) where does it say that the first timeline remnant will work the same as the other? (well, for example, we won't say that the feats accomplished by the chaos emeralds in the games should be transferred to their boom counterparts)
3) "Just in time for the 10th anniversary of Five Nights at Freddy's, return to Freddy Fazbear's Pizza in this interactive novel in which YOU decide what happens!

Dive into an interactive retelling of one of the most popular FNAF stories, and the basis for an all-new video game "Into the Pit"! You the reader are Oswald, and after using the ball pit at Jeff's Pizza to travel back in time to 1985, you've brought a sadistic animatronic back into the present. Can you escape? Or will it be a game over for you and your friends? With over 25 different possible endings and two difficulty settings, this one-of-a-kind, innovative novel is a uniquely entertaining experience for any Freddy fan."
here it is directly stated that this is an interactive retelling of the original story.
4) I saw that you made a page for the film's Afton, I want to remind you that in the novelization of the film they directly say that the incident with the springlocks caused Afton to have an outburst of agony that began to destroy the pizzeria, but that's just it, I wanted to note.
 
4) I saw that you made a page for the film's Afton, I want to remind you that in the novelization of the film they directly say that the incident with the springlocks caused Afton to have an outburst of agony that began to destroy the pizzeria, but that's just it, I wanted to note.
It wans't me man, wdym?
 
4) I saw that you made a page for the film's Afton, I want to remind you that in the novelization of the film they directly say that the incident with the springlocks caused Afton to have an outburst of agony that began to destroy the pizzeria, but that's just it, I wanted to note.
Huh really?
all this time I honestly thought the animatronics were the one who did it
 
Just another friendly reminder that this dude somehow survived the 2023 FNAF Profile Deletion

 
Since many of the FNAF characters are possibly wall level, shouldn't shadow Bonnie have that tier too?
 
Back
Top