- 44
- 9
I came to disappear again, but while I'm here I still decided to clarify why the horrors of fazbear are in the game timeline and point out a few mistakes in this post.
Let's start with the post:
1) "For example, the trilogy of novels, which is clearly in a separate timeline, moves exactly the same way, and despite the fact that they are in the same universe, it is quite obvious that they exist in a different timeline."
but scott directly said that the trilogy is not intended to be a guide to the games and the trilogy is NOT intended to solve anything, and i.e. saying that this phrase is intended for a trilogy of novels is fundamentally wrong.
Well, I'll also quickly say why using a guidebook is a bad idea. there are a lot of mistakes in the guidebooks, and the funniest thing is that they say that Glitchtrap appeared in the story "In the Flesh" or that Eleanor didn't appear in any story except "To Be Beautiful", hell, Scott didn't even know that this book uses fan renders of animatronics, and the puppet is called a male pronoun. They take the plot of the games, add theories from matpet and sell them as answers to all questions, and you can't even check the source from which you get the information.
2) "The character of Cassidy/The One You Should Not Have Killed has been changed into Andrew. Even without using the mountain of evidence that Cassidy is TOYSNHK, Andrew differs from UCN's version of TOYSNHK, namely due to the complete absence of the Stitchwraith."
Firstly, Andrew got into Stitchwraith after he blew up Afton's body, which means that this distinction is meaningless. Secondly, Cassidy is a girl, and the vengeful spirit is addressed as a boy and looks like a boy. Thirdly, what's stopping Andrew from taking on Afton after Cassidy put him down, just like Old Man Consequences said? Afton has been in the hospital for several years according to the plot.
"Michael Afton, Springtrap, Charlie Emily, and possibly Baby are still alive in FF despite dying at the end of FNaF6. These characters are dead in the games, so their reappearance in the FF series implies a different series of events."
Firstly, what's stopping Springtrap from surviving again, just like he did in FNaF 3? Even in these same books, William completely regenerates his skeleton after Andrew blew it up. Secondly, there is no baby, only Eleanor, and Charlie could have survived too, because according to the plot, only her mask is enough to defeat Afton's amalgamation. Thirdly, the story in which Michael appears is included in a collection of cut stories, which calls into question the canonicity of the stories from this book.
"Golden Freddy's entire presence in Fazbear's Frights differs from the games."
Oh, we only had one copy of Golden Freddy, didn't we? After all, there was no yellow suit and other details for the golden animatronics in the mini-games in FNAF 4? And in the plot, in no case can a pizzeria that has an entire cartoon series and a bunch of merch based on its animatronics have several more pizzerias around the state or even the entire country?
"Scott stated that while some may be connected to the games and novel trilogy, some aren't. The books themselves note that they are from different corners of the series canon."
At least don't lie here, the picture that was posted here doesn't say anything about the trilogy of novels, only about the games, and this phrase can be interpreted as follows: some stories will directly continue the story of the games, while others will be regular fillers.
