Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The same goes for Lucario who's slightly slower before getting amped. If we go by the 4x argument then Lucario'd end being 3x faster than Garnet.WeeklyBattles said:They start a max of 4 km away, Garnet will be in his range in a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a second
Unless you can prove to me that the gap between Rubies and Garnet is not only equal to the gap between Pupitar and Tyranitar, but also surpasses the fact that Ruby's feat is almost 2x less than Pupitar's, then this above statement is false. Also, how on earth would them homing not only make them easier to hit, but doesn't mean they won't change direction? Homing attacks by definitio can alter their direction.WeeklyBattles said:Shes not weaker than him and the fact that they home makes them EASIER to hit as they wont change direction
Yeeeeah, about that...Peppypony said:Alright. Now both sides are even.... >
Because Garnet isn't that far behind thanks to her huge scaling chain.WeeklyBattles said:If Lucario is really that much stronger than how is this fair?
2x is a lowball, but it's not enough to bridge the AP gap here regardlessPeppypony said:The Ruby feat is 274.23 and Garnet's apparently 2x beyond that.
Ummm I'm not gonna claim anything, but this guy's first edit is voting on this thread, little suspicious if you ask me.TheRealComicSans said:Lucario FRA